from Revolver News:
Thanks to the relentless political targeting of President Trump, there’s been a spotlight on the use of “hush money” and secret funds to sweep indiscretions under the rug in politics. This shouldn’t come as a shock to many, given the nature of fame and power, but where do we draw the line? When is it acceptable for politicians to dip into taxpayer-funded slush funds to settle their sexual indiscretions privately, and without fanfare, and when is it deemed unacceptable for a private political candidate to do the same with personal funds? Here’s the thing that’s got everyone scratching their heads: Trump’s stuck in this political circus over “hush money,” where they’re all too eager to drag him through the mud over what amounts to a flimsy misdemeanor at best.
‘Elevated risk’ of health issues from Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca jabs
Blinken has established himself as a world-class hypocrite. The $8 billion Biden administration package of military aid to Taiwan is a perfect example of such hypocrisy, as it flies in the face of international law, which recognizes only one China. What would Blinken say if China offered billions to Americans to buy arms to secede from the U.S.?
