by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World, 2nd Smartest Guy in the World:
Yesterday this Substack reviewed the latest cardiac mortality data: A few days before that, this Substack reviewed the latest cancer data: Today we tie these terrifying trends together by reviewing the latest data on excess non-PSYOP-19 natural cause mortality:
…and now the Mockingbird Mainstream Media is out with their latest coverup, but this time around it is not climate change, or any of their other usual inane alibis, but, rather, we are now presented with “accelerated aging” as the cause of young people succumbing to unprecedented cancer cases.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
In an article from today’s New York Post entitled, Cancer rates rising in young people due to ‘accelerated aging,’ according to ‘highly troubling’ new study, we are presented with the following:
Accelerated aging — when someone’s biological age is greater than their chronological age — could increase the risk of cancer tumors.
That’s according to new research presented this week at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting in San Diego, California.
“Historically, both cancer and aging have been viewed primarily as concerns for older populations,” Ruiyi Tian, MPH, a graduate student at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis and one of the study researchers, told Fox News Digital.
“The realization that cancer, and now aging, are becoming significant issues for younger demographics over the past decades was unexpected.”
In the study, diagnoses in patients younger than 55 years old were considered early-onset cancers.
The researchers analyzed data from 148,724 people using the UK Biobank database.
They estimated each person’s biological age using nine biomarkers in the blood — then compared that to their chronological age.
Of course, neither the article nor the new research dares mention the C19 “vaccines,” because “various environmental and lifestyle-related risk factors” have nothing to do with being coerced into Modified mRNA gene therapies that induce “accelerated aging,” myocarditis, prion-based diseases (previously age-related neurodegenerative conditions), turbo cancers, and the myriad other adverse events; to wit
“The principal findings highlight that accelerated aging is increasingly prevalent among successive birth cohorts, potentially serving as a crucial risk factor or mediator for various environmental and lifestyle-related risk factors leading to early-onset cancer,” Tian said in an email to Fox News Digital.
Naturally, the solution for this democide epidemic is…hope:
“This discovery challenges us to reconsider the underlying causes of the increasing incidence of early-onset cancers among newer generations,” he added.
The hope is that these findings will lead to interventions to slow biological aging as a “new avenue for cancer prevention,” the researchers noted, combined with screening efforts tailored to younger individuals.
Except that we know without a shadow of a doubt that the “vaccines” actually greatly accelerate biological aging.
In an August 2021 article co-authored by the late Nobel Laureate in medicine and famed virologist Luc Montagnier entitled, Could SARS-COV2 accelerate biological age?, the authors wrote the following:
Gueudes’ pre-publication work in May 2021, on the comparison of spike RNAs and telomerase (the enzyme that adds telomeres to the end of chromosomes) in SARS-CoV2 that comes to explain the increased aging of alveolar cells in severe COVID-19 cases, provides a link to messenger RNA therapies (used in pseudo mass vaccination) and raises many questions about post-vaccine or post-covid-19 links. Telomerase is a reverse transcriptase and the author offers a comprehensive explanation that requires peer review “The architecture of the telomerase complex involved in telomere (hTR) manufacturing is normally protected from hijacking by foreign RNA and there is a mechanism to control RNA incorporation into telomerase. But when a lot of foreign RNA is present in the cell, telomerase assembly could be impaired.”
Recall that in 2003, Scholes et al. in the journal PNAS had already shown that telomere erosion led to the activation of retrotransposons and therefore reverse transcriptase would probably not be necessary to explain that vaccine RNA could interfere with telomerase assembly and disrupt genomic homeostasis.
Is oxidative stress induced by mRNA vaccination (Pfizer, Moderna) also responsible for telomere shortening?
The spike protein in vaccines also induces inflammation and oxidative stress by binding to ACE2 receptors present throughout the body (Lesgards JF, 2021).
Given the severity of the observed side effects and the fact that the biochemical mechanisms are partly similar, it can be hypothesized that mRNA vaccines can oxidize DNA guanines and partly telomeres. It is known that post-vaccine inflammation is produced and sought after to amplify the immune reaction and the production of antibodies, and if we add to this the inflammatory and pro-oxidant action (one does not go without the other), induced by the spike protein and which can last for at least 15 days (Ogata AF et al., 2021), we have an environment that is very conducive to the oxidation of the DNA bases, the most fragile of which is guanine, in particular on the telomers.
But it gets worse:
Indeed, one study showed that vaccination with the Pfizer vaccine led to an increase in oxidative stress levels (assessed by glutathione measurement) that returned to normal after 14 days (Ntouros PA et al., 2021). This delay was nevertheless sufficient to induce telomere damage.
This oxidative stress produced by vaccination also poses another problem which is the stability of the mRNA of the vaccines themselves! In a very surprising way, the mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have been enriched in guanines! This is supposed to increase the translation of RNA into spike protein: indeed, if we study the nucleotide sequence of the spike gene of the SARS-CoV2 virus, and compare it to the coding sequence for the spike protein of the vaccine, we notice many differences which, however, do not affect the translation product (as they are synonymous codons). These changes in the nucleotide sequence were introduced by the researchers to increase the efficiency of the vaccine (they replaced bases with G’s, as much as possible, to increase the efficiency of the translation). https://www.pedagogie.ac-nice.fr/svt/?p=2967
But in the same way that it is impossible for manufacturers to ignore the toxicity of the spike protein known for ten years, it is even more impossible to ignore the fragility (oxidizability) of guanines!
It is therefore surprising that none of the regulatory authorities in charge of evaluating the marketing authorization applications for these vaccines (FDA and EMA in particular), knowing the sensitivity of telomeres and DNA to oxidative stress, have requested a toxicity study on genes (genotoxicity).
Extract from the EMA report on Comirnaty (Pfizer vaccine): “Genotoxicity: No genotoxicity studies were provided. This is acceptable because the components present in the vaccine formulation are lipids and RNA which are not expected to have genotoxic potential (EMA, 2021).
The “vaccine” spike protein (SP2) is significantly more dangerous than the viral spike protein (SP1), with the genetically modified humans transformed into inflamed SP2 factories. Because the Modified mRNA “vaccines” program the body to indefinitely produce cytotoxic SP2, which in turn suppresses the p53 protein responsible for preventing the systemic spread of cancer, the “vaccinated” have all been given VAIDS; to wit:
Read More @ 2ndSmartestGuyintheWorld.com
