by Dr. Peter McCullough, America Outloud:
People continue to ask why doctors are still supporting COVID-19 vaccination. With ~97% of Americans having contracted COVID-19, even though 75% were vaccinated, to the common man, the campaign appears to be a failure. For those who suffered injuries, disability, or death, the program was a catastrophe. Yet, the medical community continues to support endless injections every six months.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
There is a plethora of papers in the scientific literature that disclose horrific, serious adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination, including hospitalization and death, or failure of the products to stop infection, transmission, or serious outcomes like hospitalization or death. Yet somewhere in the paper, the authors insert a gratuitous promotion such as “vaccination has saved millions of lives” or “the benefits of vaccination still outweigh the risks.” These phrases come without evidence or support, seem out of place, and I wonder if they are inserted to gain institutional approval for submission or by design are used to get past biased editorial boards and reviewers who want to keep the false “safe and effective” narrative flowing in the medical literature.
After three years, finally, manuscripts are penetrating the wall of medical censorship with publication in the fully peer-reviewed and listed medical literature by the National Library of Medicine. I sat down with lead author and epidemiologist M. Nathaniel Mead, MSc, to discuss his recent publication titled COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign, published in the PUBMED-listed journal CUREUS. With 293 references and detailed analyses, Mead et al. conclude that COVID-19 vaccines never should have been used in children, and at this point, governments all over the world should stop vaccination in all age groups. The authors demonstrate the vaccines are neither safe nor effective. Here is an excerpt from the abstract:
“Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data. The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted.
Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits. Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.”
You will be amazed to hear about the extra scrutiny and exhaustive peer-review process applied to this paper compared to common submissions and how Mead prevailed with great strength and perseverance. Never combative or argumentative with the reviewers or editors, Mead demonstrated how dispassionate professionalism works in a time of scientific turmoil.
Read More @ AmericaOutloud.news
