HUGE: Could The WHO be BACKING DOWN on the Pandemic Treaty?

0
165

by Rhoda Wilson, Expose News:

The Pandemic treaty is still in the process of being drafted, however, the most recent draft may suggest that the World Health Organisation (WHO) is “backing down” as the most draconian articles within the treaty have been removed, according to Peter Imanuelsen. ‘This is a major victory for freedom.’ he says.

The WHO intends to use the idea of “One Health” to subsume all living beings under its own “authority.’ It is essentially a trojan horse for a global power grab. If successful, the treaty will give the WHO the authority to announce a “pandemic” any time they like which will enable the justification to enforce any “medical” programme it deems necessary under the guise of “world health,” regardless of their efficacy and side-effects, which includes death.

TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

The Who’s notion of “pandemic preparedness’ aims to vindicate censorship of the people and to transfer the Sovereignty regarding “public health ‘decision making globally to the Director-General of the WHO which means that legally, member countries would lose their sovereignty. Together with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the United Nations (UN), the WHO will have the ultimate control, a totalitarian governance.

‘But now there is good news – They are BACKING DOWN!’ according to Peter Imanuelsen who explains in the article below that the most draconian articles within the treaty have been removed. If this is true, then this is major new.

HUGE: ‘The WHO is BACKING DOWN on the Pandemic Treaty.’

Originally published on Substack Peter Sweden.

Feature picture – Flag of the WHO in Geneva / Photo credit Peter Imanuelsen

In the latest draft of the WHO pandemic treaty, they appear to be BACKING DOWN, removing some of the most draconian rules. This doesn’t mean that everything is all good, but this is definitely a good start and a massive victory for freedom.

First of all, they are making the treaty non-binding. This means that countries will keep their national sovereignty instead of having to hand it over to a bunch of unelected elites at the WHO.

The big issue was Article 13A in the pandemic treaty. It was originally proposed to say the following:

“1. States Parties recognize WHO as the guidance and coordinating authority of international public health response during public health Emergency of International Concern and undertake to follow WHO’s recommendations in their international public health response.”

This text would have meant that countries would be forced to follow the rules and recommendations as decided by the unelected elites at the WHO.

But this entire article has in fact now been REMOVED from the latest draft of the pandemic treaty, meaning that countries do no longer have to obey the WHO. This is a massive win for national sovereignty.

https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr8/WGIHR8_Proposed_Bureau_text-en.pdf

Last year I held a speech outside the UN headquarters in Geneva in protest of the pandemic treaty. I warned about how this was all connected to the Agenda 2030, you can see my article on that here.

And this is very good news!

Because when you look at Article 18 in the pandemic treaty and see what kind of recommendations the WHO could come up with, things get pretty scary.

For example, they can recommend the following.

  • require medical examinations;
  • review proof of vaccination or other prophylaxis;
  • require vaccination or other prophylaxis;
  • implement quarantine or other health measures for suspect persons;
  • implement isolation and treatment where necessary of affected persons;
  • implement tracing of contacts of suspect or affected persons;

This recommendations means in reality that countries could have been required to vaccinate people, implement vaccine passports and put people in quarantine if the WHO said so.

Because Article 13A.1 has been removed, it seems that these recommendations are no longer binding. They are still there, but countries aren’t bound to have to follow them.

But it gets even better!

They have also DROPPED the proposal to setup global censorship of things that the WHO deems to be “misinformation”. We all know that this would have been used to infringe in free speech, so it is massive news that this has been dropped.

In a New Article 7, it was proposed that “At the Global level, WHO shall strengthen capacities to…(e) counter misinformation and disinformation”.

Read More @ Expose-News.com