by Richard Gale and Dr. Gary Null, Global Research:
What do we do when our agencies, institutions, and the very machinery of democratic government have been commandeered by profit interests and weaponized against the people? We call for a new Nuremberg.
Over the last three years, the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, the NIAID, the AMA and U.S. Public Health Service, and a group of over 3900 American local and legacy media partners[1 2 3] engaged in a conspiracy of misinformation and misdirection which led to the preventable[4] deaths of almost 3.4 million people globally, and the preventable injuries and hospitalizations of millions or billions more. It opened the gate for the administration of over 13.5 billion doses of the world’s deadliest product ever marketed as a vaccine.[5]
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
This conspiracy of misinformation centered in part around the intentional suppression of ivermectin. A conscious disinformation campaign spearheaded by the FDA conflated human formulations of ivermectin with animal formulations. One of the tweets from the FDA’s[6 7 8 9] communications team’s “successful” “new engagement strategy,” reads: “You are not a[10] horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”
This “strategy” influenced medical[11] organizations, pharmacy boards, and hospitals. Their propaganda was widely cited in newspapers, magazines, digital media outlets, and medical and professional advisories. Additionally, federal and state courts began citing the posts in cases involving ivermectin, and they were referenced in legal complaints and judicial opinions across the US.[12]
This campaign was conducted with apparent malice of forethought. These acts culminated in what can only be called medical genocide. Never in recent history has a fraud of such magnitude and lethality been carried out.
Drs. Bryan Tyson and George Fareed of the United States treated 20,000 people with ivermectin, reporting 99.9 percent improvement and that none of those people went to the hospital. Dr. Shankara Chetty of South Africa reported treating 8,000 with zero mortality and 100 percent improvement. Dr. Jeff Davis of the United States reported treating 6,000 people with 100 percent improvement and zero mortality. Dr. Ben Marble of the U.S. reported treating 150,000 people with zero mortality and 99.9 percent improvement.
A case series of 39[13] physicians and their teams from around the world, all of whom used ivermectin as part of an early treatment protocol, including those physicians just mentioned, were found to have a mean improvement of over 94 percent, treating a total of 237,521 people.[14]
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden treated more than 3,900 patients for COVID-19, with a success rate of over 99.97 percent. None of the people she treated early required hospitalization. Were she and these other successful doctors celebrated? No. As a result of her success, Bowden was forced to resign her hospital privileges.[15]
The website c19early.org displays the totality of the evidence on the safety and efficacy of different early treatments, presenting real-time analysis of 3,335 studies of 56 early Covid early treatments, from a database of 5,674 treatments.
Source: c19early.org
According to this website, Ivermectin has been studied in 222 studies for Covid-19, 172 of which were peer reviewed, and 99 of which compared the treatment to a control group. These 99 studies were conducted by a total of 1089 scientists, involving 137,255 patients in 28 countries.
Ivermectin was found to be associated with statistically significant lower risk of mortality, ventilation, ICU, hospitalization and cases. Overall studies of early treatment with ivermectin show a 62 percent reduction of risk. Early treatment with ivermectin resulted in a 49 percent reduction in mortality.[16]
But instead of recommending ivermectin, the health establishment vilified it, calling it “horse dewormer.” Instead Anthony Fauci said that Gilead’s drug remdesivir would become the standard of care. According to c19early.org, remdesivir has been studied in 58 published[17] studies, conducted by a total of 946 scientists, involving 155,923 patients in 20 countries. Overall, studies of remdesivir show a 10 percent improvement. Clearly, remdesivir doesn’t[18] hold a candle to ivermectin in efficacy.
But it is more than just a question of efficacy. Ivermectin has a very high safety profile. Remdesivir, on the other hand, is consistently found to result in acute kidney failure.[19 20 21 22 23] It also appears to be dangerous if taken as a late treatment, evidence of which is presented below. None of the studies of ivermectin display risks comparable to those of remdesivir.
Sydney Wolfe of the public advocacy group Public Citizen wrote a letter to the FDA in April 2021 accusing them of improperly expediting approval for remdesivir, bypassing review by its public advisory committee. [24]
But the FDA, the CDC, the NIAID, the NIH, HHS, and their hired media partners insisted that ivermectin was dangerous and might kill you. They loudly broadcast the “news” that FDA/CDC partnered poison centers across America were fielding elevated numbers of “exposures” to ivermectin, incidentally at exactly the same time that prescriptions of ivermectin were noted anxiously by the CDC to be rising dramatically.[25]
An exposure is not a poisoning. A phone call without reported details does not itself mean[26] that it is a toxic case. The caller may have simply taken ivermectin along with five other medicines, or given animal ivermectin to his or her dog and got some on her fingers. If a person was hospitalized “after taking ivermectin,” that doesn’t mean she was hospitalized because she took ivermectin.
As far as we can determine, the basis of their propaganda[27] against ivermectin was based on a statistical hoax. In fact, we could not find evidence of a single poisoning attributable to ivermectin reported by an uncompromised, unbiased source in preparing this article. (see supplement for full analysis) On the other hand, acetaminophen, or Tylenol, is responsible for 56,000 emergency department visits, 2,600 hospitalizations, and[28 29] 500 deaths per year in the United States.[30]
Three doctors who prescribed ivermectin brought suit against the FDA and HHS and three health officials for their “horse dewormer” campaign, detailing the toll it took on their reputations and careers, such as suspensions and loss of hospital privileges. A new ruling has recently been presented on the case.
The judges ruled that the FDA’s anti-ivermectin[31] messaging stepped over the line into the realm of “practicing medicine,” which as a health agency it is not allowed to do. Its campaign against ivermectin to treat Covid-19 was not protected by its “sovereign immunity,” which shields it from being sued while carrying out its duties.
We present here the evidence that by waging an illegal propaganda war against ivermectin, the FDA, the CDC, HHS and their partners in crime were directly responsible for the wrongful deaths of 3.4 million people globally and the wrongful injuries and hospitalizations of millions or billions more. If ivermectin had not been effectively blacklisted, its use in early treatment could have saved millions of lives.
We present the peer-reviewed scientific studies from the National Library of Medicine that show that ivermectin is a safe and effective drug therapy, and could have reduced illness by up to 62 percent and mortality by 49 percent.[32]
We also present evidence that the protocols authorized for emergency use, including the kidney-toxic drug remdesivir, were deadly and never should have been considered safe or effective, as is clearly shown by the science.
