from WND:
‘Statistically significant increases in serious adverse events’
For months while the COVID-19 virus, which came out of a Chinese lab experimenting on making those health threats more dangerous, circled the globe and killed millions, science journals adopted a uniform talking point: Get the shots!
That, according to a new report, now has changed, with the publication in the Springer Nature medical journal Cureus, a sibling of Nature and Scientific American, a peer-reviewed paper by mRNA shot critics.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
It reveals that the results from the shots are not all good.
In fact, they can be bad.
People have said I’m a misinformation spreader because since May 2021, I have been publicly saying the COVID vaccines are not safe.
Now the medical peer-reviewed literature shows I was right. Do you believe me now?https://t.co/9OWjjqk2my
— Steve Kirsch (@stkirsch) January 30, 2024
Longtime COVID shot skeptic Steve Kirsch posted online: “People have said I’m a misinformation spreader because since May 2021, I have been publicly saying the COVID vaccines are not safe. Now the medical peer-reviewed literature shows I was right.”
At a pivotal moment, just 9 days after the @CDCgov recommended the covid vax for adolescents, in May of 2021, @CDCgov decided NOT to send an already-written alert about the risks of post-mRNA vax myocarditis.
Sending it might have changed the entire globe’s vaccination strategy,… https://t.co/AMwMaVQaCl pic.twitter.com/3mwUnfMKuC— Tracy Høeg, MD, PhD (@TracyBethHoeg) January 18, 2024
