99 million patient records and they concluded that the benefits outweigh the risks!?!? We respectfully disagree.

By
SGT
-
0
134

by Steve Kirsch, Steve Kirsch’s newsletter:

A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals concludes that the benefits of COVID outweigh the risks. My colleagues and I disagree.

Executive summary
A new study of over 99 million vaccinated people has been highly promoted in the press with headlines like “Covid Vaccines Linked To Small Increase In Heart And Brain Disorders, Study Finds—But Risk From Infection Is Far Higher.”

TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

I’m going to convince you that this is bullshit.

Results at a glance

A safe vaccine would be indistinguishable from a placebo. Does this look safe to you?

Image

Quick summary of what the article would like you to believe

Here are the key points of the study which was funded by the CDC and HHS so no conflict of interest at all:

  1. They looked at the medical records of 99,068,901 vaccinated individuals.
  2. They compared observed vs. expected (“OE”) rates of “13 selected adverse events of special interest (AESI) across neurological, haematological, and cardiac outcomes.”
  3. They only looked for 42 days after the shots since everyone knows you can’t get adverse events after 42 days (I’m being sarcastic).
  4. They didn’t evaluate mortality due to the shot since everyone knows the vaccines are safe and didn’t kill anyone (I’m being sarcastic).
  5. They found clearly increased risk of the various AESI, but the end conclusion is that the risks after COVID infection are far higher, so people should take the shots. This is unbelievable. I don’t know a single cardiologist whose business dropped after the COVID vaccines rolled out. Do you?
  6. As usual, they aren’t allowed to share the data so you have to take their word for it.

The benefits of the COVID vaccine

There aren’t any I’m aware of.

A JAMA paper inadvertently revealed that the flu vaccine and COVID vaccine don’t work at all.

Nobody has been able to explain away that result. Nobody. Ever. They just don’t want to talk about it.

Why take a vaccine if the benefit is not measurable? That VA study was the perfect proving ground. The signal should have been large. There was no signal for either the COVID or flu vaccine. It was a stunning paper.

I always love it when a paper inadvertently blows the whole narrative out of the water and the medical community is completely clueless as to its significance.

The risks of the vaccine

The paper selected just 13 AESIs to evaluate.

But did you know that the CDC has determined that there are over 500 AESIs that were more serious than myocarditis? They simply forgot to tell people that!

Here are the actual numbers from this excellent article by Josh Guetzkow:

After dropping the new COVID-era AEs, there are 503 AEs with PRRs larger than myocarditis (PRR=3.09) and 552 with PRRs larger than pericarditis (PRR=2.82).5 This means that 66.4% of the AEs had a bigger safety signal than myocarditis and 77.3% were larger than pericarditis. You can see what those were by using this Excel file provided by the CDC and sorting the 18+ tab by the 12/14-07/29 PRR column (Column E). Then just look at which AEs have PRRs larger than the ones for pericarditis and myocarditis.

I have a question.

At a minimum, they should have warned people about myocarditis and everything more serious than that. So you should have been handed a long list of serious adverse events before you got the shot.

If you got the shot, please let me know if they warned you:

Read More @ kirschsubstack.com

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR