by Victor Fernandez, All News Pipeline:
– This Is ‘Depopulation,’ aka MASS MURDER, Unfolding Before Our Eyes
What do you think of when you hear “placebo-controlled clinical trial?”
Most people familiar with the term will understand it to be the standard way many drugs are tested in order to determine efficacy and safety before they are licensed and marketed to the general public. It’s usually understood to involve a pharmacologically inactive or inert pill with no active ingredient producing no medical effect as part of a control group used to draw a comparison between it and the experimental drug under inspection.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
But if you thought that this is what is used to test the safety of vaccines, you’d be wrong.
Paul Offit, pediatrician and renowned vaccinologist, and ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network) lawyer Aaron Siri had a Twitter bout on the issue of placebos and vaccine safety in late June.
The exchange began when Siri responded to a statement in Offit’s article, “Should Scientists Debate the Undebatable.” Offit, whose article is a response to Robert Kennedy Jr.’s comments on the Joe Rogan Show, wrote “All vaccines are tested in placebo-controlled trials before licensure.”
Siri then responds to Offit with…
“Virtually all childhood vaccines on the CDC government schedule, including Rotateq (Offit’s invention, along with Fred Clark and Stanley Plotkin), were not licensed by US FDA based on a placebo-controlled trial. Robert Kennedy Jr. is correct on that point. NYTimes, Stat News, Paul Offit, Peter Hotez are all dead wrong.”
Offit responds to Siri with a tweet indicating in part that “the purpose of placebos, which are immunologically inert, is to determine the effect of the vaccine. All vaccines meet that standard.”
It is at this point when Siri drops the hammer on Offit’s response.
Siri explains that Offit’s revised definition of placebo as “immunologically inert” would focus on testing efficacy, not safety.
“Robert Kennedy was right when explaining that childhood vaccines are virtually never licensed based on a control group receiving an inert substance.”
When, for instance, Merch’s Gardasil vaccine was tested, the control group did not receive a pharmacologically inert placebo but a pharmacologically active aluminum adjuvant, namely, amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate (AAHS). The purpose behind the use of this aluminum salt in Gardasil is to cause an immune response to the antigen. If that is the case, why is it in the placebo?
It turned out that after the trial they found that 2.3% of the subjects that received Gardasil and 2.3% of those who received the aluminum injection ended with a systemic autoimmune disorder, which the adjuvant can produce as test results show. So, as Siri explains, by not using a saline placebo…
“You ended up with a vaccine group and a control group with the same rate of harm. So for the purpose of FDA standards they are safe because they are equally harmful, but from the perspective any rational, normal- thinking, caring human being…not safe, not safe at all.”
To cite another example, Prevnar 7 was not tested against a saline placebo, either. But it served as the control for yet another vaccine – Prevnar 13. In this case results show that infants and toddlers developed serious adverse events following vaccination in 8.2% among Prevnar 13 recipients and 7.2% among Prevnar 7 subjects. This should have alarmed the FDA because the baseline safety for Prevnar 7 remained unknown. Attorney Siri explains this to Offit. But Paul Offit says nothing about it in response.
Read More @ AllNewsPipeline.com
