Monday, March 25, 2019

A Look Inside The Secret Swiss Bunker Where The Ultra Rich Hide Their Bitcoins


from ZeroHedge:

Somewhere in the mountains near Switzerland’s Lake Lucerne lies a hidden underground vault containing a vast fortune.

It’s no ordinary vault, according to Quartz. Built inside a decommissioned Swiss military bunker dug into a granite mountain, it’s precise location is a closely guarded secret, and access is limited by myriad security precautions.

But instead of gold bars, the bunker contains hard drives on which customers’ bitcoins are being kept in what’s call “cold storage” – i.e. the owners’ private keys are protected by an air-gapped hard drive. The vault is one of many operated by Xapo, an early bitcoin company known for its cold storage wallet products and a debit card that pays for transactions in digital currencies.

The company won’t disclose how much bitcoin is stored in the vault, but one employee who spoke with Quartz said he sometimes takes customers with millions of dollars in bitcoin on tours of the vaults where their fortune is stored. Xapo was founded by Argentinian entrepreneur and current CEO Wences Casares, whom Quartz describes as “patient zero” of bitcoin among Silicon Valley’s elite. Cesares reportedly gave Bill Gates and Reed Hoffman their first bitcoins.

As Quartz explains, the bitcoin vault doesn’t store actual bitcoin units. Instead, what’s being stored are the owners’ private cryptographic keys that allow the owner to access and transfer his or her bitcoins by matching the key with a public key that’s used to identify the coin on the blockchain. Gaining unauthorized access to someone’s private keys is akin to making off with a gold bar.

The inexorable rise in bitcoin’s valuation has been marred by notable hacking incidents like the collapse of Mt. Gox, which ushered in the longest bear market in bitcoin’s history. Security fears appear to have subsided as bitcoin’s price has soared to all-time highs, but incidents like the collapse of the DAO have inspired investors with substantial bitcoin wealth to look into protecting it.

Read More @

The Central Planners Lullaby


by J. Johnson, Miles Franklin:

We seem to be in a lull in market moving news, or is it more the gyrations within the market that have been put to sleep?  The question offers an implication that the exchanges and human emotions “used” to be connected, which in the past, these major events would have caused market fluctuations in price. It is most famously known as market volatility. We have mentioned previously how the damages to an entire string of islands and flooded land masses seem to mean nothing to the markets, but are there other human events that are not being expressed within all things market besides these examples? Stated another way, is there more evidence to this removal of humanity’s movements from the markets? I sure think so.

We’ve witnessed massive spikes in the Silver and Gold markets when stories like JP Morgan was being investigated for market frauds, or when the CFTC Silver investigation was being discussed. We watched Silver reach a height in price almost equal to the 1980 life of contract high of $50 partly because of this investigation. We also witnessed Gold prices not only exceed the old 1980 price of $887.50, we watched it blow past more than double the price with a top value of $1,921, because life was changing as were the dynamics within the markets but for now, our markets have been given a lullaby.

What may be changing, is everything!  Imo, Algo’s were created in order to control pricings in all things manufactured including all commodities traded on the exchanges, like selling 20,000 contracts of Gold within minutes. At the same time, it seems to me that all of mankind is ready to, or is in the process of, remove central planning in its entirety from the ground up. For good reasons too! Let’s dig in and see if you agree?

We can go back to when the Egyptians finally had enough of their dictator Mubarak. In 2011, a mass of people walked into their cities and squares and literally forced out their leadership with such strength that not even the military challenged the masses. We’ve seen the attempts of not only Scotland but Ireland try to break free from the central planners of Great Britain, but missed out because of the vote count and by those that count the vote. However, Britain was successful in removing itself from the European Union, thanks to an Average Joe type guy named Nigel Farage (a Trump supporter), and boy, what a fight that was!  Italy, Spain, France, and Greece, have all tried to separate (by voting as well) from a union no longer to their liking, but to no avail. On the macro scale, what is this we are seeing?

Most recently Catalonia voted to divorce Spain and it’s central planners for forcing the population to undergo tax increases and more rules to protect a currency experiment that went horribly awry and was not their fault, but since central planners have no skin in the game, they tack the losses onto the back of its people and the planners think nothing of it … That is imo, an unfair international tariff to support a failed system PERIOD!! It is a tax not voted on and the masses are starting to get really pissed at this imposed burden put upon them. I see the probability that those that plan at the top have no idea how pissed those in the work force really are.

All of Europe is going thru another failed experiment in which the populations of all these nations are again, not been allowed to vote on a subject, and that is immigration. The nation’s deciders have forced immigration policies upon their citizens the same way the taxes have been piled on to the work load of the few that do have jobs. It is as if all these G7 governments are working against their own population wants and needs at every turn. When has this ever worked for any nation in history?

Inside the United States, we almost witnessed the same thing.  If Trump hadn’t won, we may have gone the “walk like an Egyptian”(s) with all the law violations administered by a certain party (all at the planner’s level and even within another conglomerate, the media). We are now seeing the dismantling of a union because the central plan has failed to such an extent that those that still have a job cannot afford to pay the governments fees anymore in order to keep our current system afloat. That is because of our global military police unit, the United Nations that we fund, NATO, CAFTA, NAFTA, and all the other central planned economic failures piled on, are not profitable or beneficial to our peoples.

What I think is happening is a complete uprising from the entire global population of the G7 world because of all the hubris created by those that never had a real job but act like they know what the working class feels and needs. I think this is the point of contention in all things and all we’re waiting for is an affirmation. You know, that moment in time in which the central planners say in unison “Oh S**t!!”

There is a fine example (of the OS moment) from a few hundred years ago in which the French population simply pulled out their newly created anti-central planner device (the guillotine) and used it on just about anyone they laid blame on for being forced to “eat cake”, but not necessarily the proper use of law. Mubarak is a most recent example when judicial law is used properly and this guy gets to do the prison walk for life. My hope is the prison doctors use everything in their powers, abilities, with up to date technological methods and medicines to keep that body alive for as long as possible. What a fine example of an extended life prison sentence!

I do feel we are in the change of a lifetime and I do think it will be beneficial for those that are properly invested, but not in accordance to the failed plan that is in the process of being confirmed, but the plan that has protected those that see that the future moves echoing from the past.

Read More @

Anecdotes and Reminiscences


by Hugo Salinas Price, Plata:

A well-known story from yesteryear: when Venustiano Carranza was President of Mexico (1917-1920). Carranza issued a great quantity of worthless paper money, which caused much resentment on the part of the population. Someone (whose identity was never discovered) printed up some papers, and these were pasted one night on the walls of buildings in the heart of Mexico City; the papers had the following text:

“The Mexican eagle is a very cruel animal: It eats only silver, and shits only paper.”

President Carranza was furious on account of the insult, and his government offered a reward of $5,000 Pesos for information leading to the arrest of the culprit.

The witty author answered with a new text pasted on the walls of downtown Mexico City during the following night:
And with what is the payment to be? With what the eagle eats, or with what the eagle shits?

Another tale from the time of Carranza: one good day, one of the humble peasant women selling vegetables in the great “Merced” market of downtown Mexico City refused to receive payment for her vegetables in paper money. She demanded silver coin in payment. Her example was swiftly followed by the rest of the women selling foodstuffs at the market. I have no further information on what happened after that, but I suspect that this refusal to accept paper money led to the end of Don Venustiano’s paper money scheme. In 1920, he created the 0.720 Peso (i.e. 72{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} pure silver) which was the money that Mexico used up to 1945, when the coin could no longer be minted because the price of silver in the coin became worth more than $1 Peso.

I think it is interesting to know why the Mexican monetary unit is called the “Peso”. In 1535, the Mexican Mint in Mexico City began to mint silver coins that eventually became the most-used money in the world: the famous “Pieces of Eight”. (Under President Jefferson, the model of the Mexican “Pieces of Eight” was the model used for the US Silver Dollar.) After Mexican Independence, the “Pieces of Eight” minted under Spanish rule had to be modified in their facial characteristics, in accord with the new situation of independence from Spain. The world “peso” in Spanish, means “weight”. The new coin was called the “Peso”, because it contained the same weight of silver as its predecessor, the “Pieces of Eight”. This Mexican silver Peso continued to be the money of Mexico from 1812, shortly after Independence, up to the outbreak of the Mexican Revolution, in 1910. So the silver money established under Monarchy continued without change for nearly four centuries, from 1535 to 1910 – a notable case of monetary stability, perhaps only outdone by the gold Bezant of the Byzantine Empire.

Venustiano Carranza was assassinated in 1920: some historians claim that he was assassinated because his policy did not accommodate the interests of the US, whose aim was to put an end to the great productivity of Mexican agriculture, at the time in the hands of the great landowners of the country. Don Venustiano was opposed to the “Agrarian Reform” that the US wished to impose upon Mexico.

Perhaps the assassination of Don Venustiano also opened the way for the creation of a Central Bank in Mexico, which took place in 1925. Its organization was parallel to the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913. We cannot know whether he would have favored the creation of a Central Bank, or not.

Up to 1925 there existed in Mexico private banks which were well-managed, as for example the Terrazas Bank in the State of Chihuahua in northern Mexico, whose banknotes enjoyed an unblemished reputation as representations of wealth – that is to say, their banknotes were fully redeemable in silver money upon presentation to the bank. However, there were also some private banks that were not well-managed by their owners, who used their banks to finance their own ventures, which sooner or later led to their bankruptcy, to the detriment of their depositors and creditors, among which were the owners of the banknotes they had issued as money.

One of the reasons given both for the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913, and for the creation of Banco de Mexico in 1925, was that it was necessary to do away with “the bankruptcy of banks” – though the leaders of the move to create the Federal Reserve were the great bankers of the US, who wanted to create an entity that would protect them from their own mismanagement, by means of a guarantee of financial support of the Federal Reserve if and when they should run into a situation of insolvency.

The result of the “Guarantee” on the part of the Federal Reserve was that all the banks associated to the banking system under the control of the Federal Reserve immediately proceeded to operate imprudently: if one bank acted imprudently without any risk, it would have a competitive advantage over its rivals; therefore all were compelled to act imprudently or get left behind. The mismanagement consisted in “borrowing short and lending long”, in other words using funds obtained either “at sight” or for a short period of time from depositors and investors, and lending them out for a longer term, which was more profitable. The same result obtains at present, in the Mexican banking system.

Another reason given for the creation of a Central Bank in Mexico, was that the issue of banknotes would not be permitted to private banks, but would be a function enjoyed exclusively by the Central Bank, which would thus establish a sound and reliable monetary system in the country.

However, what was achieved was a situation which was much worse: instead of having to suffer the bankruptcy of some isolated banks of private property, the establishment of Banco de Mexico became an entity which would collaborate with the government in the government’s requirements of unlimited spending.

The interests of isolated cases of private banks whose mismanagement continued until they reached insolvency and bankruptcy, were substituted by a Federal entity, Banco de Mexico, which can never go bankrupt and whose banknotes and digital money must be unquestionably accepted in payment of debts, notwithstanding their continual depreciation.

Up until 1925, and practically since our Independence up to the present, with the exception of the revolutionary period (1910 – 1925) the Peso/Dollar ratio was always more or less $2 Pesos for $1 Dollar. Today, the Peso/Dollar ratio hovers around $19,000 Pesos for $1 Dollar – if we ignore the make-up applied to the Peso en 1993, when three zeros were erased from the ratio. And we all know that the Peso is in danger of falling to $20, to $23, to $25,000 or more – God only knows what is in store for the Banco de Mexico Peso!

To make matters worse, we have to take into account the fall in value of the Dollar itself, during the same period – for the same reason, excessive money printing or creation of excessive digital money. It has been calculated that the US Dollar is today worth only 3 Cents or less of its value in 1925.

One highly important result of the monetary system we are forced to endure, has been the progressive moral deterioration of society in general, both in the Mexico and in the US – actually in the whole world.

Read More @

The Power Players Behind Silencing Wall Street Reformers


by Pam Martens and Russ Martens, Wall St On Parade:

America has now been through various iterations of “it’s time to stop bashing Wall Street” by writers who seem to easily get air time or plenty of print space to make their case. An OpEd in the New York Times today is the latest in this endless series. We’ll get to that column shortly, but first some necessary background.

Wall Street did not accidentally run a barge aground and leave a small oil slick on the Hudson River. Wall Street did not accidentally release tainted lettuce that sickened a few dozen people. What Wall Street did was intentional and criminal: it financially engineered a toxic subprime house of cards which it knew from its own internal reviews was going to collapse; it then molded the toxic product into inscrutable bundles; it sold the bundles to unsuspecting investors around the globe while making side bets that it would all come crashing down. Then, after causing the greatest financial collapse in the United States since the Great Depression, Wall Street’s unrepentant scoundrels paid themselves billions of dollars in bonuses with taxpayer bailout funds.

One of the largest wrongdoers of this era, Citigroup, received the largest taxpayer bailout in history (over $2.5 trillion in loans, cash infusions and asset guarantees) and while this was occurring, one of its executives, Michael Froman, was staffing up the administration of the next President of the United States, Barack Obama, including an accepted recommendation for the head of the Justice Department.

The 2007-2009 financial crash was more than the product of greed. There was both knowing and criminal wrongdoing, but none of those responsible have gone to jail. None of the regulatory gaps that allowed this to happen have been rectified. The biggest Wall Street banks have grown even bigger and remain too-big-to-fail; Wall Street is still paying the rating agencies for their Triple-A ratings; highly speculative Wall Street firms are still allowed to hold trillions of dollars in taxpayer-backstopped insured deposits in the commercial banks that they are allowed to own under a Byzantine bank-holding company structure with thousands of far-flung subsidiaries around the globe; and a handful of Wall Street banks continue to house trillions of dollars of derivatives inside their insured depository banks – something the public was assured would end under the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation.

Those who are lecturing the public to just get over it are either tone deaf, compromised or both.

In March 2016, the Editor-in-Chief Emeritus of Bloomberg News, Matt Winkler, wrote an opinion piece for Bloomberg News titled “Stop Bashing Wall Street. Times Have Changed.” Winkler absurdly wrote: “Banks also have reined in most of the proprietary trading in derivatives that brought them into conflict with their depositors.”

At the time Winkler made that ridiculous statement, Citigroup was loading up on the very same derivatives, credit default swaps, that blew up the big U.S. insurer, AIG, and added billions of dollars more to Citigroup’s own losses. (See our report: “Bailed Out Citigroup Is Going Full Throttle into Derivatives that Blew Up AIG.”)

In 2014 there was Politico’s Ben White preposterously asserting the following in a column headlined “How Washington beat Wall Street”: “In 2009, Washington went to war against big Wall Street banks hoping to blow up the kind of high-risk, high-reward strategies that helped spark the financial crisis. Five years later, that war is largely over. And Washington won in a blowout.”

The same day that White’s article ran, the Huffington Post published this retort from Dennis M. Kelleher, President and CEO of Better Markets, Inc., a public interest non-profit organization:

“Only in the warped, distorted, Alice-in-Wonderland world of Wall Street would one think ‘Washington went to war against big Wall Street banks’ or that ‘Washington won [the war] in a blowout,’ as said today in a Politico article…It may be counterintuitive, but the article reflects a fairy tale Wall Street loves to push. Not only that they have been picked on and been under/are under enormous pressure (almost all unfair, undeserved and counterproductive) by US and global regulators, politicians and policy makers, but, hey, they’ve lost and Washington won, so, ease up. No need to take any further action against the ginormous global too-big-to-fail banks that are bigger, more interconnected and dangerous than they were before the last crisis that they caused. No. Enough’s been done.

“Indeed, according to the article, the war is over. The American people should move on to other things. Washington should declare victory and return to its past practices of coddling the beaten Wall Street banks and cashing their campaign contribution checks. Nothing to do or see here.”

Before White, there was Maria Bartiromo’s appearance on Meet the Press in 2013 where she asserted that “We need to get beyond the conversation of is Wall Street evil.” Bartiromo spent two decades at CNBC before joining Fox Business Network in January 2014. At CNBC, as we previously reported, there appeared to be a co-branding operation in play between Bartiromo and Citigroup.

Now fast-forward to today’s OpEd in the New York Times, titled “Why Democrats Need Wall Street.” The column was written by Douglas Schoen, whose bio under the opinion piece offers simply this: “Douglas Schoen was a pollster and senior political adviser to President Bill Clinton from 1994 to 2000.” In reality, Schoen’s official bio at his website says he is “a founding partner and principle strategist for Penn, Schoen & Berland,” also known as PSB. In 2001, PSB was acquired by the marketing and communications juggernaut known as WPP, which owns the powerful strategic communications firm, Burson-Marsteller. The Worldwide President and CEO of Burson-Marsteller is serving simultaneously in the role of Chairman of PSB.

In the midst of the financial crisis in 2009, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow revealed that the disgraced insurance firm, AIG, which had backstopped Wall Street’s insane credit default swaps while failing to hold capital to pay them off and required a $185 billion bailout from the taxpayers, had hired Burson-Marsteller to “shine up” its image. (See Youtube video clip below.) Maddow described Burson-Marsteller as follows:

“Who’s Burson-Marsteller? Well, let me put it this way — when Blackwater killed those 17 Iraqi civilians in Baghdad, they called Burson-Marsteller. When there was a nuclear meltdown at Three Mile Island, Bobcock & Wilcox, who built that plant, called Burson-Marsteller. The Bhopal chemical disaster that killed thousands of people in India, Union Carbide called Burson-Marsteller. Romanian dictator, Nicolae Ceausescu — Burson-Marsteller. The government of Saudi Arabia, three days after 9/11 — Burson-Marsteller.

“The military junta that overthrew the government of Argentina in 1976, the generals dialed Burson-Marsteller. The government of Indonesia, accused of genocide in East Timor, Burson-Marsteller.

Read More @

The Deagel Report: An Eerily Accurate View Of What America Will Look Like In 2025 With Unfolding De-Population Events Underway

from All News Pipeline:

In this new story from Daisy Luther over at the Organic Prepper she asks a great question as her title, “If a North Korean EMP could kill 90{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} of Americans in a year, why did they just defund the Congressional EMP Commission?” 

As we reported on ANP back on October 12th, despite pleas from EMP experts such as Dr. William R. Graham and Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, the intelligence has fallen upon deaf ears and as this story over at The Hill reported, North Korea won the battle against America’s EMP Commission. Sadly, losing that battle could result in 90{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} of Americans dead within the year following such an attack and as was asked by Dr. Pry in this ANP story back on October 10thwill America’s epitaph be ‘died of stupidity’? Yet we need to remember that it WASN’T North Korea that killed the EMP Commission but those within America. 

And because of that, maybe we shouldn’t be surprised that the EMP Commission has been disbanded as their warnings have gone unheeded for nearly 17 years, leaving America’s biggest ‘achilles heal’ totally un-addressed. Despite more and more evidence that North Korea has the capability to launch such an attack upon America, we’re reminded that all they’d need was one successful attack to send America quite literally back to the dark ages. You can see the statement given by Dr. Pry and Dr. Graham to Congress in the Scribd document that we’ve embedded below videos

With America now suffering through one disaster to the next with droughts and fires, massive weather modification taking place across the country, what appears to be an orchestrated psy-op going on in Las Vegas with nothing making any sense with the coroners office there on lockdown and earth changes from the east coast to the west, we take a look within this story at why the website’s forecast for 2025 America likely gives us a very accurate view of what future America will look like. With depopulation events now happening across the nation, many more are likely on the way if the globalists goals are to be met. 

First, from the Organic Prepper story

So, for 17 years, this group has been ringing the warning bell and no one has been listening. Now that the threat is at our doorstep, their funding has been pulled. Something doesn’t add up.

Why would the EMP Commission suddenly be disbanded at a time when America may be under the greatest threat that we’ve ever been of an EMP attack with these same experts recently warning that 90{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} of Americans could die after such an attack upon us? If there really are ‘enemies of America within’ who want Americans dead in huge numbers such as those shown over at, there’d be no better way than an EMP attack upon us. 

Likely called either ‘fake news’ or a ‘conspiracy theory’ by the mainstream media and the general US population, the is still forecasting an 85{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} drop in the population of America between now and 2025. With 324 million people living in the US in 2016, their bizarre forecast of only 54 million people living here in 2025 defies explanation. 

While the population density drop of 34 inhabitants per square mile in 2016 to only 6 inhabitants per square mile in 2025 as seen in the screenshot from Deagel above might delight those who find it difficult to live among huge crowds of people, they also put further emphasis upon what America might look like within only 7 years. The huge drops in both gross domestic product and GDP per capita show an America as a 3rd world nation, or an America sent back to the dark ages via an EMP attack that brings down our grid and is just beginning to truly rebuild our infrastructure.  

These numbers seen below also show an America whose military has been ‘neutered’ with a drop from $612 billion in military expenditures in 2016 to a forecast of only $8 billion spent upon the military in 2025. What does Deagel know that we don’t know? With purchase power parity forecast to drop from $57,300 in 2016 to only $11,304 in 2025, they see an America in 2025 looking almost as bad as Venezuela in 2016, which had a PPP of $15,100

Do these numbers show ‘the fall’ of America? It’s long been warned that for the globalists to complete their imposition of a global, totalitarian dictatorship, the strongest country must fall…and that is America

Read More @

SMOKING GUN TREASON: There Really Was A Russia Conspiracy – And It Involves the Clintons!


from Fox News, via Tommy Stone:

Sean Hannity 10/17/17 – Hannity Fox News Today October 17, 2017 TRUMP, NFL PROTESTS, JOHN MCCAIN

Tying Harvey Weinstein to the Las vegas Event

from Miles Matthis:

As usual, this is just my opinion, take it or leave it

Yep, you read that right. There is a link between the two events. They didn’t come out almost simultaneously by accident.

This is going to be much shorter than my recent Las Vegas comments, but I do have something to say. Be patient, because I will make it worth your while. I’m sure Weinstein is a big creep, and I don’t like seeming to defend him, but this whole things stinks of yet another project. It reminds us of the recent Bill Cosby story, which is also a lie and a conjob. Just ask yourself this: do you think it is possible to fire a man from his own company for sexual harassment accusations? This is a country of law— allegedly—not a country of hearsay. Legally, you cannot be fired for accusations. You can only be fired for convictions. That is true for little ole you, working at the Five&Dime, but it is also true for CEOs of major companies. The law is supposed to be blind to such distinctions. So even if a company’s board of directors had the power to fire the majority owner and head of the company— which is doubtful—they still don’t have the legal authority to do so based on accusations. Weinstein should be suing for wrongful termination, but mysteriously we don’t see that. More logically, we should see him (and his family) firing his board of directors. So all this is fishy in the extreme.

As I said, Weinstein is no doubt a nasty person, but do you really think all these actresses accusing him of touching their tushies or whatever are any less nasty? Why believe them on a first reading? Shouldn’t they be required to prove these allegations in a court of law? Do you think no woman has ever lied about sexual harassment? Think again. People in the modern world are liars, and the richer they are the better they are at lying. And that includes women as well as men.

To be honest, I don’t really give a rat’s behind whether Weinstein grabbed someone or not. All the planted feminists are shouting that Affleck and Damon and all the Hollywood males are complicit in this, but—given the story we are expected to believe—do you know who else was complicit? The actresses who were grabbed and said nothing for years. Yeah. Why don’t you ask them why they are coming out now? Why not report it when it happened, if it was so awful? We know why: they wanted to get ahead and become famous and rich. Which they did. Which is why they are nasty. They were free to file charges, weren’t they? They were free to work somewhere else, with someone else. But they didn’t do that.  For that reason, I have trouble taking any of this seriously.

But it is even bigger than that, since I don’t believe any of this happened at all. I suspect it is just one more big stageplay. That is what these people do. They lie all day about everything. These are actors, actresses, and other Hollywood people, so—like politicians and media people—they are professional liars. Some play the heroes in these productions and others play the heavies. Also, remember that all these people in Hollywood—male and female—are gay. No guys are grabbing any woman’s naughty bits, since they are too busy grabbing eachothers’. Frankly, I don’t think the top actresses are lying here for money, since many of them already have a lot of that. What it looks like to me is that we have signs of a war between major Jewish families here, with some in Hollywood taking one side and some taking the other. Best guess is some big investment group wants control of The Weinstein Company, and this is the form of the hostile takeover. I showed you that this is how it is done now in my paper on John Lennon. There, after proving Lennon is still alive, I showed you how Blackrock/Blackstone wormed its way into Sony/ATV via the Michael Jackson fake molestation charges and later faked death. We also saw it in my analysis of the Aurora/Batman shooting in the same paper, where I showed you these big investment groups used that hoax to apply pressure to billionaire Philip Anschutz, owner of Cinemark theaters—where the fake shooting took place. They wanted to take over his profitable companies (AEG), which they almost did. In a rare turn of events, Anschutz—after appearing whipped —suddenly gave himself a pep talk, drank a Gatorade, and leapt back into the ring swinging. He fired his Blackrock advisors and is now richer than he was then. But that is not how it usually happens.

In the modern world, hostile takeovers aren’t just achieved with higher bids, shareholder pressure, or stock buyouts, they are achieved via black ops run against the opposing owners. Since some of the biggest billionaires control parts of the Intelligence apparatus, they can use a cadre of agents to run a project against the owner of a big company. I would say that is what is happening here with Weinstein. He is a lesser billionaire whose assets look tasty to the trillionaires.

Which means. . . the timing of this is no accident…

Read the entire PDF @

Massive criminal conspiracy unravels: Hillary Clinton took $145M from Russians to sell out the U.S. uranium supply to America’s enemies (and the FBI knew all along)

by Mike Adams, Natural News:

 We have truly reached the point in American history where criminal indictments need to be immediately leveled against James Comey, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Robert Mueller and a dozen other high-ranking officials who are now known to have been complicit in one of the most treasonous criminal cover-ups in American history.

Although the entire left-wing media is running a campaign of complete silence on this story, the rest of the media is now widely reporting that, under President Obama, the FBI had documented an exhaustive trail of corruption, bribery and treason that involved Hillary Clinton, State Department corruption and Russia-linked mining companies that acquired rights to U.S. uranium supplies. This truth was described in great detail in the book Clinton Cash by Peter Schweizer, and now evidence is emerging that further confirms the depth of collusion, corruption, money laundering and treason that Hillary Clinton actively pursued to collect $145 million from Russia-linked sources.

According to The Hill:

Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews.

They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.

Former President Barack Obama oversaw this criminal racketeering scheme, according to multiple sources. “It turns out the Obama administration knew the Russians were engaged in bribery, kickbacks and extortion in order to gain control of US atomic resources — yet still OK’d that 2010 deal to give Moscow control of one-fifth of America’s uranium,” writes the New York Post. “Hillary Clinton, again, sat on a key government body that had to approve the deal — though she now claims she had no role in a deal with profound national security implications, and during the campaign called the payments a coincidence.”

“…[T]he State Department under Clinton and other agencies on the Committee on Foreign Investment approved unanimously the sale of Uranium One, a Canadian mining company, to Russia’s state nuclear company Rosatom, which gave Moscow control over 20 percent of U.S. strategic reserves,” reports NewsTarget.

Robert Mueller ran the FBI as this criminal racket was taking place

What’s even more astonishing about all this is that Robert Mueller, now running a partisan special counsel investigation into the fake conspiracy theory that falsely claims Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election, was the head of the FBI while this Uranium One treason was taking place.

“Until September 2013, the FBI director was Robert Mueller — who’s now the special counsel probing Russian meddling in the 2016 election. It’s hard to see how he can be trusted in that job unless he explains what he knew about this Obama-era cover-up,” writes the NY Post.

“The connections to the current Russia case are many. The Mikerin probe began in 2009 when Robert Mueller, now the special counsel in charge of the Trump case, was still FBI director. And it ended in late 2015 under the direction of then-FBI Director James Comey, whom Trump fired earlier this year,” adds The Hill.

Mueller, who like James Comey appears to be a political lackey for the Clinton crime cartel, is just one of many shadowing players in this rapidly unraveling story of corruption and lies. Bill Clinton, wouldn’t you know it, is also implicated. As The Hill explains:

Peter Schweitzer and The New York Times documented how Bill Clinton collected hundreds of thousands of dollars in Russian speaking fees and his charitable foundation collected millions in donations from parties interested in the deal while Hillary Clinton presided on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.

U.S. Senate investigation launched to uncover the truth about this treason, corruption and collusion

As The Hill writes, this morning the Senate has launched an official probe into this astonishing criminal cartel that was operating right under the nose of Barack Obama:

The Senate Judiciary Committee has launched a probe into a Russian nuclear bribery case, demanding several federal agencies disclose whether they knew the FBI had uncovered the corruption before the Obama administration in 2010 approved a controversial uranium deal with Moscow.

…[T]he FBI had uncovered evidence showing Russian nuclear officials were engaged in a racketeering scheme involving bribes, kickbacks and money laundering designed to expand Russian President Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business on U.S. soil.

As Sean Hannity rightly explains:

HANNITY: “Tonight, with this new evidence, what we have discovered is that the evidence against the Clintons is overwhelming, it is incontrovertible. Hillary Clinton and her husband sold out America to the Russians while millions of dollars flowed to their family foundation. And in the process, Clinton created a massive national security risk for every man, woman, and child — giving Vladimir Putin control over American uranium.”

It’s time to start arresting, indicting and prosecuting top Obama officials

Had Hillary Clinton become president, her administration would have covered up all these crimes. That was the entire plan, of course: Fake the polls, run a fake news media blitz and steal the election by convincing people that Clinton’s victory was inevitable. From there, Obama would pass the baton to Clinton, where the criminal collusion of both of them would be forever buried under a web of complicit FBI directors and media lackeys who have abandoned real journalism.

But Trump’s victory threw the plan into disarray, and now the true depth of the collusion and corruption of the Obama-Clinton crime machine is finally coming to light. With this new evidence emerging that proves the Obama administration covered up Hillary Clinton’s pay-to-play corruption, President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions must pursue criminal prosecutions against all the top officials who were involved. This list includes Robert Mueller himself, as well as James Comey, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton and a long list of other complicit co-conspirators.

These people conspired to sell out America’s uranium supply — a strategic resource needed for national defense — to one of America’s most dangerous enemies, all in exchange for over $100 million that got funneled into the Clinton Foundation. The facts of what went down are, themselves, an indictment of Obama regime officials who were fully aware of what was happening but allowed it to take place anyway. “The Trump administration doesn’t need another special counsel,” writes the National Sentinel. “All that needs to happen is for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to use the evidence the FBI already has and start issuing arrest warrants. He can begin with the most corrupt, criminally investigated presidential contender in U.S. history: Hillary Clinton.”

Read More @


by Adan Salazar, Infowars:

Kymberley Suchomel believed media was covering up multiple shooters

A woman who died days after surviving the ill-fated October 1 country music festival in Las Vegas wanted to organize a survivor’s group in order to flesh out the strange event, Facebook conversations reveal.

Kymberley Suchomel, 28, died suddenly on October 9 at her Apple Valley, California, residence five days after posting her version of events to Facebook.

In the days following the massacre, friends reached out to Suchomel over a October 4 post in which she described someone setting off “fire crackers” near the venue, and detailed being chased by numerous people, concluding at one point “There was more than one gun firing. 100{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} more than one.”

One longtime friend of Suchomel’s, who asked to remain anonymous, provided Infowars with screenshots of a conversation he’d had with her, in which she indicated planning to “organize a group of survivors” in order “to piece things together.”


Read More @

Wayne Allyn Root – Mitch McConnell on Thin Ice?


by Kerry Lutz, Financial Survival Network:

Wayne Allyn Root believes that Senate Leader McConnell is ready for a fall. The sooner the better. The Senate and House have been the enemies of the people for many years and now Trump has totally unmasked them. What really happened in the Las Vegas Massacre? Wayne believes that MGM systematically disarmed its security guards to save on insurance. As a result, the Mandalay Bay turned into a defacto gun free zone. He was in a nearby restaurant when the shooting started. It was unclear how many shooters there were and where the shots were coming from. Scary times!

Click HERE to listen

Read More @