The Senate Report on COVID-19 Origins Disregards the Most Important Question


    by Daisy Luther, The Organic Prepper:

    A Special Report by Brian Duff and Daisy Luther

    Slightly more than three years after the name “COVID-19” was coined for a novel coronavirus that infected the world, we still have more questions than answers. A bombshell report has just been released by the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. The report, Muddy Waters: The Origins of Covid, is the result of an almost two-year, bipartisan investigation into the origins of the COVID virus. The group was led by U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, M.D. (R-Kansas). You can read the entire 302-page document yourself at this link.

    TRUTH LIVES on at

    Here’s what it’s all about. From Page 1, Paragraph 2:

    Experts have put forward two dominant theories on the origins of the virus. The first theory is that SARS-CoV-2 is the result of a natural zoonotic spillover. The second theory is that the virus infected humans as the result of a research- related incident.

    The information contained in this Source Reference Document reflects 18 months of extensive research and accompanying analyses of these two plausible hypotheses. This document was the product of a multi-disciplinary effort by medical, scientific, legal, political, and general policy analysts to catalog open-source (unclassified) information relevant to the respective theories.

    Both hypotheses are plausible. The natural zoonotic spillover hypothesis is weakened by the absence of key epidemiological and genetic data from the Huanan Seafood Market. However, data required to support a natural zoonotic source is dependent on information provided by China, and that is incomplete or contradictory. The preponderance of circumstantial evidence supports an unintentional research-related incident.

    But wait a second. Read this part again. required to support a natural zoonotic source is dependent on information provided by China, and that is incomplete or contradictory…

    We’re being told the release of COVID-19 was unintentional, but the sentence directly before that conclusion says that it’s “dependent upon incomplete and contradictory information from China.”

    So, there are NO FACTS that support this. There are only circumstantial, subjective beliefs. The unintentional release is reminiscent of all the other “This is the way it is—establishment facts/narratives” that have been pushed.




    Gain of Function.

    The list could go on and on of what we were told were facts, only to learn later, were not proven at all. In fact, we discovered in many cases, the opposite of the so-called facts was the truth.

    So, in this case, if the opposite of an “unintentional” release was true, that would mean it was released intentionally. And, if the true desire is to sort out the origins of COVID, the intentional release theory must be examined.

    And why wouldn’t we look at an intentional release, since everything the system is pushing is the “unintentional” theory? After all, isn’t the scientific method to prove a hypothesis wrong? If so, then why are they not trying to prove the “unintentional” theory right or wrong? It’s merely an assumption they are presenting as fact.

    In his video, Dr. John Campbell (who has discussed the problems of the COVID-19 narratives on his YouTube channel) states that he believes the virus was likely to have escaped due to a lab worker selling an infected animal. That would then merge the lab leak theory with the wet market theory. However, is it just a coincidence that the virus was out in the public and surging, as we’ll show later, at the same time the World Military Games and Event 201 were happening?

    Let’s take a look at the timeline of what we know.

    2017-06 (Genetically Engineered Virus Experiments Begin)

    EcoHealth Alliance and COVID Virus

    According to the Bulletin, scientists at the Wuhan lab – working on a project under a grant from EcoHealth Alliance – tested genetically engineered coronaviruses for experiments between June 2017 and May 2019. Among the experiments, they joined one virus with the spike proteins of another on “humanized mice” – mice that had human cell receptors. In some cases, these genetically engineered or “chimera” viruses made the mice sicker than the unmodified virus.

    Read More @