Out with the Old, In with the New Security/Development Architecture

    0
    365

    by Dennis Speed, LaRouche Organization:

    Dec. 31—“There are sayings around the Kennedy Center, carved above the marble above the colonnades when you walk in. And on the back side toward the Potomac, there’s one; it’s a quote from President Kennedy that says: ‘I look forward to the day when America is no longer afraid of grace and beauty.’ And I thought immediately when he was shot, that that’s why he was shot. We are afraid of grace and beauty.”—Ramsey Clark, former U.S. Attorney General, quoted in the documentary “Citizen Clark”

    TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

    At year’s end, how can we find the means by which we must inspire people in the Anglosphere to defend principles of statecraft which they have forgotten, never learned, or never even heard? Forcing the revealing of the truth of the Kennedy assassination, and the destruction of the American Presidency by Anglo-American institutions, not lone assassins, would be a ready- made lesson in statecraft, and a fierce weapon against those that would today lead us into thermonuclear war with Russia, as they also sought to do in 1962. Such truth is terrible, but also beautiful. It is liberating. That is also the quality of truth implicitly contained in the Ten Principles for a New Security and Development Architecture. Those Principles say that we, and the world, need not be tragic. We can be more than mere characters in a play we did not write, did not cast, and are not directing.

    The Kennedy murder was the assassination of the Presidency, not merely the President. Later, Presidential candidate Robert Kennedy, and “the man most qualified to be President,” the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. would be additional victims of the bloody secret crime. Sixty years later, it has almost killed the American Republic. It has killed other nations. It is the crime at the root of the murder of Libya and its leader, the murder of Iraq and its leader, the 42-year-long (1979) violation of Afghanistan, the ongoing murder of Syria, and the murder of American citizens in the unacknowledged but true events of September 11, 2001. (Vladimir Putin and other leading world figures know the intimate details of much of this.) Now, finally, the criminal enterprise must be dismantled, in Wall Street, Washington, D.C. and London, because that assassin apparatus is speaking about “decapitation of Moscow,” and other things that would have been considered mad at the height of the Cold War in the 1950s and 1960s.

    To reveal this crime, people, especially Americans, must think internationally. They must think of implementing the Zepp-LaRouche Ten Principles, because the opposition to them comes from this international and internal “secret government” and its assassination bureau. That is why Helga Zepp-LaRouche still heads the Ukrainian kill list. These are the same people that oppose the Vatican’s initiative for seeking a peaceful resolution to the “world war in pieces” already begun. There is always a higher power than tyranny, including tyranny by assassination. That authority is the truth, wherever and by whomever it is stated. (https://schillerinstitute.com/blog/2022/11/30/ten-principles-of-a-new-international-security-and-development-architecture/ )

    The Ten Principles for a New Security and Development Architecture are, in one sense, a current re-statement of the original mission of the Schiller institute. Forty years ago, when the idea of the Institute was first proposed by founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche, it was hoped that such an institute might be welcomed by American governmental and institutional figures. Premised upon the idea of Friedrich Schiller that “it is through Beauty that one can proceed to true Freedom,” it could become the catalyst of a cultural and strategic dialogue, and a transformation of the United States, through which the cultural preconditions and determinants for a new Western Alliance might have been formed in the aftermath of President Ronald Reagan’s March 23,1983 adoption of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). That “Nicholas of Cusa” proposal, incomprehensible to the United States State Department and others, was rejected, and the Schiller Institute became an independent venture based on correcting the precise problem which Ramsey Clark indicated as the “higher reason” the 35th President of the United States, John F. Kennedy was murdered.

    The Schiller Institute under the leadership of its founder then pursued a series of economic, cultural and scientific policies through that four-decade span, intersecting many governments and advancing that work in ways that today give it a “mountaintop” vantage point. We know that now, as this year ends, time has also run out; the citizens of the United States are now faced with a choice. What is that choice?

    The Dec. 29 end-of-the-year videoconference “mini-summit” between Presidents Xi Jinping of China and Vladimir Putin of Russia was anything but mini in its implications. Amid mutual references by the two Presidents to each other as “my good friend,” it became clear that at least as much of importance went unsaid, as was publicly expressed. One thing, however, that was not missed by several of the commentators, friendly or hostile, was that President Putin referenced that there would be increased military cooperation between the two nations. There is, in other words, no division that will come between China and Russia on strategic matters. While CNN, the Bezos Washington Post, and British news sources impotently painted a picture of “two cornered leaders with big problems at home,” others were more perceptive. Alexander Mercouris and Alex Christoforou of The Duran said:

    Mercouris: “This was a very, very long call. They talked about a great many things…. Putin mentioned that there is now very intense military cooperation between the two…. Xi Jinping talked about the fact that their partnership is now going to have a global impact … on all parts of the world…. And I think that anybody that looks at the way that these two leaders talk, the interactions between the two countries, I can’t myself see this as anything other than a de facto alliance….

    Read More @ LaRoucheOrganization.NationBuilder.com