Closer, But Still No Cigar


by Ted Butler, Silver Seek:

It’s remarkable to me how close we appear to be getting to near-universal recognition that silver and gold (along with a host of other commodities) are priced based upon the activities of a relative handful of large paper traders on the COMEX (and other exchanges) and not on the workings of the world of actual supply and demand. I’m convinced that once the critical level of universal recognition is achieved (and it appears to be quite close), then we will experience the true free market price, which will be decidedly higher, particularly in silver.


Almost every day, I see new evidence that the number of those questioning the COMEX price-discovery process in silver is growing – sometimes, even without the knowledge of those doing the questioning fully-realizing that they are waking up to a price manipulation that has existed for decades. Wait a minute, I can hear you say – how is it possible for anyone to question the COMEX price-discovery process without realizing they are doing just that?

In fact, let me up the ante and provide an example of what I’m talking about as the “anyone” in this case being a quartet of seasoned metals professionals, whose combined total experience measures more than a century. It comes in the form of an hour-long discussion put out this week by the LBMA on silver. (In the interest of full-disclosure, I have no known relation to the analyst on the panel sharing my name). I’ll summarize what was discussed, but here is the link –

It seems the discussion resulted from an earlier meeting arranged by the LBMA, in which a fairly large number of analysts had offered a consensus price projection for the next year involving a very modest increase in the price of gold, but a quite-surprising expectation of a rather dramatic increase in the price of silver of some 50%. This is very much outside the normal bounds of typical consensus predictions. The discussion in question (just linked) was intended to examine and reconcile the very bullish price consensus on silver.

There was, in my opinion, an accurate and objective presentation of the actual world supply and demand fundamentals in silver, as would be expected, since one of the participants was the head of the research team (Metals Focus) that provided the basis for the Silver Institute’s recent bullish silver review (already discussed on these pages). Data discussed included the rather shocking import of nearly 300 million ounces of silver this year by India, fully 35% of total world mine production. What commodity could see that level of import demand with prices actually falling, not rising?

To the credit of the panel, there was no attempt to dispute the accuracy of the data and for the first time in my memory serious questions were raised about the role of the COMEX in the pricing of silver. For example, I was quite shocked to hear that the COMEX was the “tail that was wagging the dog” (I should have put a copyright on that phrase), and a new one on me – “the COMEX is like a speedboat, while the actual supply and demand is like a supertanker”.

Still, there were obvious attempts to avoid the dreaded “M” word (manipulation). Trying to reconcile why the COMEX managed money traders were big net sellers over the balance of this year – in the face of extremely bullish physical demand – all manner of explanations were offered, revolving around outlooks for interest rates, the dollar, the economy, and yada, yada, yada. I wanted to scream at my computer screen – no, no, no. The managed money traders don’t consider anything, except price direction, as those short are purely technicians – slaves to price movement. The commercials rig prices lower and just like Pavlov’s dogs, the managed money traders sell.

It’s not just the analysts on this panel that continue to confuse this issue, as I see many others which try to reconcile why the managed money traders got so heavily short COMEX silver futures this year, even though the pattern over the years couldn’t be clearer. Put prices lower and the managed money traders will sell and sell short, period. The only question is who is capable of “putting” prices lower to induce the managed money to sell short and if you can’t figure out that the answer is the commercials, then you must have missed all the many billions of dollars in fines and settlements paid by the commercials (banks) over the past decade for rigging prices for spoofing. Another puzzle for me is how it is still assumed that the COMEX commercials are somehow, legitimate hedgers. A legitimate hedger would be a mining company looking to lock in a price – but what mining company would look to lock in the level of silver prices seen recently?

It’s hard to dismiss the thought that the panel came to the quite-obvious conclusion that something was messing with the true price discovery process in silver and this is the closest I’ve seen yet that it was positioning on the COMEX. In years past, I thought the refusal of those in London to recognize the influence of the COMEX might have something to do with turf prejudice – NY vs London, but I didn’t sense that in this presentation. However, coming closer than ever before and still not making the obvious conclusion that this is a COMEX price manipulation, plain and simple, makes me wonder why? Perhaps it’s the realization that this has been going on for decades and, unfortunately, that means missing the key element in pricing for all that time.

Or perhaps there is some other impediment to the full-recognition that silver (and gold) prices are manipulated on the COMEX, like someone reluctant to see something if it endangers future compensation. I’m not unmindful of such pressures and my now 37-year quest to expose and end the COMEX silver price manipulation involved leaving my long-term employment in the brokerage industry, no particular walk in the park. I can certainly understand and appreciate such pressures.

Regardless, the growing recognition, fully-admitted or not, that silver and gold prices are manipulated on the COMEX is occurring on what seems to be a daily basis. It’s hard to run a scam and fraud of this magnitude and level of seriousness when too many see it. Add in the fact that these are supposedly closely-regulated markets and those responsible for the regulation, including the CFTC, CME Group, SEC, DOJ, and others, including JPMorgan and BlackRock (sponsor of SLV), have been reduced to virtual silence in the face of increasing evidence and allegations of price manipulation – the most serious of all market crimes. Who could imagine such a set of circumstances?

Then again, the perpetrators of the ongoing price manipulation – including some of those just mentioned – are not about to go down without a fight. That’s because the resultant fallout promises to be severe when the silver manipulation is ended. When, not if, prices explode, that will expose the price lie of the past four decades, along with all the consequences, legal and otherwise, that will entail. What this means is that the prime perpetrators of the silver manipulation, the large COMEX commercial shorts (banks) will seek to extend the scam until that last possible moment.

Read More @