U.S. Justice Department Steps into the FTX Bankruptcy Case in Delaware


    by Pam Martens and Russ Martens, Wall St On Parade:

    Two attorneys from the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. have filed an appearance with the Bankruptcy Court in Delaware that is hearing the bankruptcy case filed by the disgraced crypto exchange, FTX, and its related hedge fund, Alameda Research. Both are majority-owned by the scandalized former crypto kingpin Sam Bankman-Fried. More than 100 other global tentacles of FTX are included in the bankruptcy case. The DOJ attorneys that made the notices of appearance are Seth Shapiro and Stanton McManus.

    TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

    The notice of appearance for both attorneys references two noteworthy statutes, 28 U.S.C. § 516 and 518, among others: 28 U.S.C. § 516 reads as follows:

    “Except as otherwise authorized by law, the conduct of litigation in which the United States, an agency, or officer thereof is a party, or is interested, and securing evidence therefor, is reserved to officers of the Department of Justice, under the direction of the Attorney General.” (Italics added.)

    28 U.S.C. § 518, reads in part:

    “When the Attorney General considers it in the interests of the United States, he may personally conduct and argue any case in a court of the United States in which the United States is interested, or he may direct the Solicitor General or any officer of the Department of Justice to do so.” (Italics added.)

    The notices from the Department of Justice were filed yesterday. Today, the following item has been added to the court docket on behalf of FTX:

    “[SEALED] Motion to Authorize (Motion for Entry of Interim and Final Orders (A) Authorizing the Debtors, in their Sole Discretion, to Provide Indemnification and Exculpation to Certain Individuals, (B) Authorizing Certain Actions Pursuant to Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, and (C) Granting Certain Related Relief) Filed by FTX Trading Ltd.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A # 2 Exhibit B) (Landis, Adam) (Entered: 11/22/2022)” (Italics added.)

    The ”debtors” are FTX and its related companies that have filed bankruptcy. Its legal standing to, in its “sole discretion,” indemnify and exculpate anyone for potential crimes is preposterous. And to place the details of this absurd request under seal is a further outrage to the sensibilities of all Americans.

    Reuters has reported that Bankman-Fried moved as much as $10 billion of FTX customers’ money to his separate hedge fund, Alameda Research, through a “backdoor” in its software. Alameda is reported to have lost much of the money on bad investments and efforts to prop up its FTX token (FTT), while $1 billion to $2 billion has just “disappeared,” according to Reuters. The Financial Times reported that FTX held just $900 million “in easily sellable assets” against $9 billion “of liabilities the day before it collapsed into bankruptcy.”

    The major law firm overseeing the FTX bankruptcy proceedings is Sullivan & Cromwell, which has a host of conflicts because of past legal work it did for FTX and related companies.

    It is also not clear who had the authority to hire Sullivan & Cromwell for the FTX bankruptcy case or who had the authority to hire the new FTX CEO, John Ray III. The pleadings in the case thus far fail to indicate who it was that hired Sullivan & Cromwell or Ray.

    Yesterday, Wall Street On Parade sent an email to Robert Giuffra and Scott Miller, Co-Chairs of Sullivan & Cromwell, and to Andy Dietderich – one of the Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers who is involved in the bankruptcy case as well as the attorney who represented FTX and Alameda in their curious efforts to buy the assets of the bankrupt crypto firm, Voyager Digital, a company from whom Alameda had taken hundreds of millions of dollars in loans. We wrote as follows to Sullivan & Cromwell:

    “We’re planning an article for early next week on the FTX/Alameda situation and we’re wondering how Sullivan & Cromwell was appointed to handle the bankruptcy process in the Delaware court.

    “Our question stems from the fact that the new FTX CEO reports that the Board of Directors of FTX didn’t meet — so it was a non-functioning Board that wouldn’t appear to have the legitimacy to appoint a law firm to handle the bankruptcy.

    “The CEO until November 11, Sam Bankman-Fried, has been characterized in court filings by the new FTX CEO, John Ray III, as being incompetent at best and a fraudster at worst. So it doesn’t appear that Bankman-Fried had legitimacy to appoint Sullivan & Cromwell.

    “So, you can see our puzzlement as to whom had the authority and legitimacy to appoint Sullivan & Cromwell.

    “Our deadline is today at 10 p.m. ET.”

    We received no response from anyone at Sullivan & Cromwell.

    We scoured the filings in the FTX bankruptcy case to see if there was an inkling of how a law firm that was attempting to help FTX buy up other firms while FTX was reportedly looting customer accounts got hired for the bankruptcy court case.

    We found the following interesting tidbits from the new CEO, John Ray:

    “I have over 40 years of legal and restructuring experience…Never in my career have I seen such a complete failure of corporate controls and such a complete absence of trustworthy financial information as occurred here. From compromised systems integrity and faulty regulatory oversight abroad, to the concentration of control in the hands of a very small group of inexperienced, unsophisticated and potentially compromised individuals, this situation is unprecedented.”

    Can a group of inexperienced and potentially compromised individuals hire the successor CEO and the bankruptcy law firm for a global crypto firm being investigated around the world?

    Ray writes elsewhere:

    “I, John J. Ray III, hereby declare under penalty of perjury as follows: 1. I am the Chief Executive Officer of the above-captioned debtors and debtors-in-possession (collectively, the ‘Debtors’), having accepted this position in the early morning hours of November 11, 2022. I am administering the interests and affairs of the Debtors from my offices in the United States…

    “In the days leading up to the Petition Date, certain of the circumstances described in Part III below became known to a broader set of executives of the FTX Group beyond Mr. Bankman-Fried and members of his inner circle. Questions arose about Mr. Bankman-Fried’s leadership and the handling of the Debtors’ complex array of assets and businesses.”

    And there is this:

    “As the situation became increasingly dire, Sullivan & Cromwell and Alvarez & Marsal were engaged to provide restructuring advice and services to the Debtors…”

    Again, no specific names of who hired them.

    And this:

    “At the same time, negotiations were being held between certain senior individuals of the FTX Group and Mr. Bankman-Fried concerning the resignation of Mr. Bankman-Fried and the commencement of these Chapter 11 Cases. Mr. Bankman-Fried consulted with numerous lawyers, including lawyers at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, other legal counsel and his father, Professor Joseph Bankman of Stanford Law School. A document effecting a relinquishment of control was prepared and comments from Mr. Bankman-Fried’s team incorporated. At approximately 4:30 a.m. EST on Friday, November 11, 2022, after further consultation with his legal counsel, Mr. Bankman-Fried ultimately agreed to resign, resulting in my appointment as the Debtors’ CEO. I was delegated all corporate powers and authority under applicable law, including the power to appoint independent directors and commence these Chapter 11 Cases on an emergency basis.”

    Aside from the fact that all night negotiations ending at 4:30 a.m. in the morning are perhaps not the best way to determine the fate of a company and its customers’ missing funds, again Ray makes the claim that he was “delegated all corporate powers and authority under applicable law,” but fails to state the person or persons who delegated this power to him.

    Read More @ WallStOnParade.com