There’s No Doubt There Will Be More Pandemics Because They’re Intentionally Creating Them


    by Rhoda Wilson, Daily Expose:

    No biodefense research is purely defensive – to do the work, you’re automatically engaged in the creation of biological weapons.

    Early on in the Covid pandemic, Francis Boyle, PhD., was sure it was the result of a lab leak. He believes monkeypox is another lab creation, as it now suddenly has 30 mutations from the wild monkeypox found in Africa.

    President Biden recently signed the ‘Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe and Secure American Bioeconomy’, and this order basically promises we’ll see additional manmade pandemics.

    TRUTH LIVES on at

    Section 12, paragraph VII in Biden’s executive order states that the purpose of the order is to “develop and work and promote and implement … dual-use research of concern, and research involving potentially pandemic and other high-consequence pathogens.”

    That means they intend to perform gain-of-function research on deadly pathogens, any one of which could be released to create a global pandemic when a scare event is necessary to trick populations into choosing a false sense of safety over freedom. Boyle believes there’s no doubt there will be additional pandemics because they’re intentionally creating them.

    Boyle believes monkeypox was engineered and released in an effort to scare governments and populations into accepting the World Health Organisation’s pandemic treaty, which would make the WHO the sole decision-maker in pandemic situations.

    Note: The website disappeared on the morning of 23 September 2022.  You can subscribe to Dr. Mercola’s Censored Library on Substack HERE.

    In this interview, repeat guest Francis Boyle – whose background includes an undergraduate degree from the University of Chicago, a Juris doctor (lawyer) degree from Harvard and a PhD in political science – shares his views on the latest efforts to instil fear in the public, this time about monkeypox.

    Click on the image below to watch the interview on Bitchute.

    Mercola: Crimes of the Covid-19 Pandemic, Interview with Francis A. Boyle, 27 September 2021 (60 mins)

    The transcript for the interview above can be found HERE.

    For decades, Boyle has advocated against the development and use of bioweapons, which Covid-19 appears to be. He called for biowarfare legislation at the Biological Weapons Convention of 1972 and drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, which was passed unanimously by both houses of Congress and signed into law by George Bush, Sr. in 1989.

    Early on in the pandemic, Boyle was sure Covid-19 was the result of a lab leak. In fact, he was one of the first to bring that up. Of course, for the past two-plus years, anyone who shared the lab leak theory was vilified, discredited, censored and de-platformed. Today, we know that information was true, and even corporate media are starting to report on it.

    White House Admits More Pandemics Will Be Created

    As detailed in ‘Executive Order Advances Biotech-Transhumanist Agenda’, President Biden recently signed the ‘Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe and Secure American Bioeconomy’.1 As noted by Boyle, this executive order basically ensures the creation of additional bioweapons:

    It’s a very lengthy executive order. At the very end, they give it all away, where it says, [in Section 12] Paragraph VII, that the purpose of this is to ‘develop and work and promote and implement … dual-use research of concern, and research involving potentially pandemic and other high-consequence pathogens …’

    Now let me work that out for you. “Dual-use research of concern” means offensive and then defensive biological warfare weapons. The Bidenites admit here that their agenda is to promote and implement more offensive biological warfare weapons. That’s what “dual-use research of concern” means.

    Then, to try to perfect these weapons with some type of bogus vaccine involving reverse engineering or something like that. Notice, they admit they are going to develop these offensive biological warfare weapons, “involving potentially pandemic and other high consequence pathogens.”

    They are going to research, develop more biological warfare weapons like Covid-19, that the United States government was involved in. They admit this right here.

    Now, you listen to the mainstream news media and everyone is saying “Yes, the next pandemic is coming.” This is where it is coming from – right here, “dual-use research of concern involving potentially pandemic and other high consequence pathogens.”

    Executive Order Cannot Override Bioweapons Convention

    If you wonder whether this kind of dual-use bioweapons research might violate the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, the answer is yes. The 1989 act directly prohibits this kind of activity. But beyond its unlawfulness, Boyle’s primary concern is that it’s existentially dangerous to continue down this path.

    “Covid-19, which I was the first to blow the whistle on, was clearly an offensive biological warfare weapon with gain of function properties that had leaked out of that Wuhan BSL-4, China’s Fort Detrick.

    “The Bidenites have made it clear they’re going full speed ahead. They have crossed the Rubicon. They do not intend to turn back. They’re doubling down, they’re tripling down. In my opinion, this is what confronts us now today,”he says.

    While some claim an executive order can override a previous law and/or signed treaty, according to Boyle, this is incorrect on both accounts.

    “No, an executive order cannot override my Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, and it cannot override the Biological Weapons Convention,” he says.

    This is just an in-run around both of them – an attempted in-run, despite the fact that violation of my Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act is a felony punishable by life imprisonment.

    The Department of Justice did want me, repeatedly, to put the death penalty in there, but I’m a lifelong abolitionist and I did not want any statute of mine to carry the death penalty.

    So, then, which takes precedence? And how do we resolve or reconcile this conflict? According to Boyle, no reconciliation is possible, barring new legislation by Congress.

    Whoever drafted this [executive order] knew full well that they were violating the Biological Weapons Convention and my Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act. An executive order cannot supersede either a treaty or a statute. Only a subsequent statute by Congress could do that.

    Resisting Medical Tyranny

    A related tangent brought up in the interview is how the Emergency Powers Act has been misused to strip us of personal freedoms and liberties. Essentially, this pandemic has demonstrated that you can turn a democratically elected Congress into a tyrannical regime that can rule without restraint.

    Boyle recently published a book in which he discusses this, titled ‘Resisting Medical Tyranny: Why the Covid-19 Mandates Are Criminal’. In it, he also details how we can fight against this tyrannical overreach using peaceful and entirely legal means.

    Read More @