Tuesday, May 24, 2022

What An ACTUAL Attorney General Must Do

by Karl Denninger, Market Ticker:

Look folks, it’s simple.

The US Attorney General is required to enforce the laws as written.

Jeff Sessions has never done so as AG.  President Trump has never insisted that he do so.

Judges cannot re-write laws and neither can prosecutors.  Juries can refuse to enforce an unjust law (or one applied unjustly) but they can’t re-write the law either.

So let’s cut the crap eh?

False Flag Election

from BATR:

A conventional election cycle gets serious and begins when the Labor Day holiday is over. Well, there is nothing normal in a country which is divided among establishment statists, global corporatists, extreme anarchists, Marxists authoritarians vs. Trump ‘Deplorables’. The prospects of the 2018 midterm U.S. Federal elections have the entire political structure of the power elites in a panic. The President ran on a platform as a ‘Disrupter’ and he has fulfilled the dismantling and substitution of many unaccountable Deep State operatives with honest public servants.  Brace yourself for much more than the silly season of campaigns. Get ready that the danger level of a monumental false flag is upon us and that the country faces a shock heard round the world.  

The protectors of the top down autocratic power elites have a unified political interest to see that President Trump’s slate of America First candidates lose their elections to the House and Senate. The accuracy of the polls is suspect, as usual. The prospects of a massive whistle stop endorsement campaign by President Trump intent to get out the vote has pushed the NeoCons within the GOP and the Democrat collectivists to cooperate against the pro populist advocates that the heartland embraces.

Will the Real John Brennan Please Stand Up?

by Philip Giraldi, The Unz Review:

The battle between many former intelligence chiefs and the White House is becoming a gift that keeps on giving to the mass media, which is characteristically deeply immersed in Trump derangement syndrome in attacking the president for his having stripped former CIA Director John Brennan of his security clearance. One of the most ludicrous claims, cited in the Washington Post on Sunday, was that the Trump move was intended to “stifle free speech.” While I am quite prepared to believe a lot of things about the serial maladroit moves and explanations coming out of the White House, how one equates removing Brennan’s security clearance to compromising his ability to speak freely escapes me. Indeed, Brennan has been speaking out with his usual vitriol nearly everywhere in the media ever since he lost the clearance, rather suggesting that his loss has given him a platform which has actually served to enhance his ability to speak his mind. He should thank Donald Trump for that.

Will Brennan Be Called Before A Grand Jury?

by Harley Schlanger, Rogue News:

The revocation of former CIA chief John Brennan’s security clearance by President Trump should just be a first step toward reversing the damage that he and his collaborators have inflicted on the United States. There are calls for a special counsel to investigate the Russiagate fraud that he launched, with a guiding hand from the imperial forces of British intelligence. Their campaign, which Trump calls a “witch hunt”, has constrained the President from proceeding with a decisive break from the old geopolitical doctrine of confrontation with Russia and China, a doctrine fully embraced by Brennan during his career.

Understanding Putin Is Easy – Unless You Like to Make Things Hard

by F. William Engdahl, New Eastern Outlook:

Russian President Vladimir Putin dances at a lady’s wedding in Austria, and European media goes nuts. America’s President Donald Trump meets with Russia’s leader, and all of Washington cries out for a coup d’état and a public hanging. Meanwhile, the people of the world wait for solutions to their real problems. Here’s a look at why those solutions will probably never come.

How do we explain all the rage from western politicians, bankers, generals, and the technocrats toward Vladimir Putin? The answer is a lot simpler than your average geo-policy expert will ever elucidate. The Russian leader stood (stands) in the way of the privateers who intended to carve up the world’s most resource-rich country. Crimea, the whole election meddling mess, spy poisonings, all these lesser events were anticipated, planned, contrived as a contingency strategy against all those opposed to the “wrong” one world government. End of story.

What Do The Banks Know? – Craig Hemke (21/08/2018)

by Craig Hemke, Sprott Money:

Much is being made of the current makeup of the Commitment of Traders report for Comex gold. However, similar historical irregularities are appearing in other assets, too. Thus the question, are The Banks setting the stage for a wildly volatile second half of 2018?

First, an update on the Commitment of Traders report for Comex gold. For the survey week ended Tuesday, August 14, more astonishing changes appeared within the general CoT structure:

  • The Large Speculator (hedge funds, managed money, trading funds) NET position is now SHORT 3,688 contracts. This is the first reported NET short position for this group since December of 2001.

Stop the British Attack on the President, and End London’s Money System

by Harley Schlanger, LaRouche PAC:

Just weeks from an important U.S. mid-term election, we have so thoroughly exposed the American players in the “Russiagate” coup attempt against President Trump — at the FBI, the Justice Department, among the heads of the surveillance state such as John Brennan — that they may wind up prosecuted for the crimes of their “investigation.” Legal assassin Robert Mueller looks increasingly desperate in his maneuvers to pull off an entrapment of the President, and produce a report begging the new Congress to impeach him.

How a Free Market Inevitably Produces Dictatorship

by Eric Zuesse, Strategic Culture:

Who rules the land? A deeper and truer version of this question is: What rules the land? Is it the money (the aristocracy), or is it the people (the public, the residents on that land)? (For the interest of paleoconservatives, the issue of residents’ citizenship will come later here, as “immigrants” instead of as “citizenship”; but our basic focus is not ethnicity/nationality; it’s class: the money, versus the voters; not the natives, versus the foreigners.)

In a democracy, the public rule — the people do — and it’s on authentically a one-person-one-vote basis, and anyone who is a resident in that land can easily vote, just like anyone else who lives there, because only the residents there, during the specific time-period of the voting, are the ultimate decision-makers, over that land, and over its laws. This is what a democracy is: it’s one-person-one-vote, and, in the political sense, it’s total equality-of-rights and total equality-of-obligations — real and total equality-by-law: equal rights, and equal obligations, for all residents. A democracy applies the same requirements to everyone.


by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star:

I have a “rule”: One doesn’t matter; two is a coincidence at worst or a synchronicity at best; and three is a pattern. Well, I might be violating my rule today because of an unusual circumstance, or synchronicity, or potential pattern. Perhaps this should be left in the “you tell me” category than in the “call it conspiracy” category.

Regular readers here know that one of the stories that I’ve tried to track over the years is the story regarding “strange doctor deaths,” particular of physicians that are either “alternative medicine” promoters, or that challenge vaccination studies, or correlate autism and vaccination, and so on. Well, what happens when one of those “homeopathic” doctors just happens to be the physician to the Queen of England? On its own, it should at least send the suspicion meter into the orange zone, and it did mine (article shared by Mr. S.D. and many others):

Social media censorship—here are the deep basics

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News:

Orchestrated un-creation of the fabric of free speech—this is what we’re seeing.

Several of the biggest “conservative/libertarian” figures on the Net—Alex Jones, Dennis Prager, Stefan Molyneux, among others—have recently been banned/censored by Google, Facebook, Twitter, and other social media companies.

When you ask why this is happening, one obvious answer pops up right away:

These social media corporations are fulfilling desperate pleas from major news outlets, who have been losing audience, in massive chunks, to the likes of Jones, Prager, and Molyneaux.

When Did The Democrats Turn Into The ‘War Party’? The Disastrous History Of False Flags Being Used To Take America Into War

by William B Stoecker, All News Pipeline:

There was a time when the left at least pretended to stand for peace and to oppose excessive militarism and unnecessary wars…but that time, apparently, is long past. Leftists today, motivated by a mindless hatred for President Trump and by identity politics, seem not to care that we still have troops in harm’s way in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, or that we are aiding Saudi Arabia in a brutal war against Shiite rebels in Yemen, or that we still have contingents of troops (mostly spec ops) in African countries most of us cannot find on a map.

It was not always so. America has a fine tradition of principled opposition to wars and to conscription. Lincoln’s Civil War was never popular; most Northerners would have rather let the South go its way. They may have opposed slavery or desired to preserve the Union, but not to the point of being willing to die for such causes. The most violent draft riots in US history took place in New York City during the Civil War. Europeans in 1914 marched off to war with boundless enthusiasm, but most Americans would have preferred to let the Europeans settle their own problems without our becoming involved.