{"id":357641,"date":"2023-06-10T15:30:00","date_gmt":"2023-06-10T19:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/?p=357641"},"modified":"2023-06-10T02:42:18","modified_gmt":"2023-06-10T06:42:18","slug":"state-bill-would-charge-any-parent-who-doesnt-affirm-transgenderism-with-child-abuse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/2023\/06\/state-bill-would-charge-any-parent-who-doesnt-affirm-transgenderism-with-child-abuse\/","title":{"rendered":"State bill would charge any parent who doesn’t affirm transgenderism with ‘child abuse’"},"content":{"rendered":"
from WND<\/a>:<\/em><\/p>\n Also puts ‘schools, churches, hospitals’ at risk of criminal counts<\/p>\n A\u00a0recently amended California bill<\/a>\u00a0would add \u201caffirming\u201d the sexual transition of a child to the state\u2019s standard for parental responsibility and child welfare\u2014making any parent who doesn\u2019t affirm transgenderism for their child guilty of abuse under California state law.<\/p>\n AB-957<\/a>\u00a0passed California\u2019s State Assembly on May 3, but a cosponsor amended it after hours in California\u2019s State Senate on June 6.<\/p>\n TRUTH LIVES on at\u00a0https:\/\/sgtreport.tv\/<\/a><\/p>\n Assemblymember Lori Wilson, D-Suisun City, wrote the bill, and introduced it on February 14. Senator Scott Weiner, D-San Francisco, cosponsored it. Wilson\u2019s child identifies as transgender.<\/p>\n Originally, AB-957 required courts to consider whether a child\u2019s parents were \u201cgender-affirming\u201d in custody cases. Wiener\u2019s amendment completely rewrites California\u2019s standard of child care.<\/p>\n AB-957 post-amendment \u201cwould include a parent\u2019s affirmation of the child\u2019s gender identity as part of the health, safety, and welfare of the child,\u201d altering the definition and application of the entire\u00a0California Family Code<\/a>.<\/p>\n California courts would be given complete authority under Section 3011 of California\u2019s Family Code to remove a child from his or her parents\u2019 home if parents disapprove of LGBTQ+ ideology.<\/p>\n By changing the definition of what constitutes the \u201chealth, safety, and welfare of [a] child,\u201d schools, churches, hospitals, and other organizations interacting with children would be required to affirm \u201cgender transitions\u201d in minors by default\u2014or risk charges of child abuse.<\/p>\n AB-957 could also expand which organizations provide \u201cevidence\u201d of gender \u201cnonaffirmation\u201d to California\u2019s courts.<\/p>\n