{"id":357371,"date":"2023-06-08T17:40:34","date_gmt":"2023-06-08T21:40:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/?p=357371"},"modified":"2023-06-08T01:53:39","modified_gmt":"2023-06-08T05:53:39","slug":"10-things-you-need-to-know-about-dna-rna-vaccines-for-livestock","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/2023\/06\/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-dna-rna-vaccines-for-livestock\/","title":{"rendered":"10 Things You Need to Know About DNA & RNA Vaccines for Livestock"},"content":{"rendered":"
by The Sharp Edge, Corey’s Digs<\/a>:<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Not all genetic technologies used in veterinary medicine fall under the categories of \u201cmRNA vaccines\u201d or \u201cmRNA gene therapies.\u201d\u00a0 There are other terms to look out for when it comes to genetic technologies for veterinary medicine.\u00a0 These terms also include:<\/p>\n TRUTH LIVES on at\u00a0https:\/\/sgtreport.tv\/<\/a><\/p>\n With\u00a0SEQUIVITY\u2019s RNA Particle Technology<\/a>, a \u201cgene of interest provides instructions\u201d to the immune cells which \u201ctranslate the sequence into proteins\u201d that \u201cact as antigens.\u201d This triggers an immune response.<\/p>\n As for\u00a0AgriLab\u2019s ExactVac DNA technology<\/a>, \u201cthe vaccine is produced by splicing a gene for a specific antigen\u201d into \u201ca bacterial plasmid\u201d which \u201cis then multiplied, purified and administered\u201d for \u201cdelivery into target cells, where antigens produced by the plasmid elicit an immune response.\u201d<\/p>\n Bayer\u2019s\u00a0Zelnate DNA immunostimulant<\/a>\u00a0is \u201cmade up of a special type of immunostimulatory DNA surrounded by a lipid carrier or liposome\u201d which is then \u201cengulfed by the animal\u2019s immune cell\u201d where the \u201cliposome breaks down exposing the DNA\u201d and the \u201cpathogen-associated molecular pattern\u201d of the DNA \u201cattaches to the immune cell\u2019s toll-like receptors triggering activation of the immune cell.\u201d<\/p>\n The USDA\u2019s\u00a0Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)<\/a>\u00a0and their Center for Veterinary Biologics is responsible for approving veterinary biological products including vaccines and DNA or RNA-based biologics. Here are the lists of the currently licensed\u00a0veterinary biological products<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0biologics for aquatic animals<\/a>.<\/p>\n There are several DNA and RNA-based genetic technologies that have received USDA approval or conditional approval for use on chickens, cows, fish, and pigs as outlined below.<\/p>\n There are a number of ongoing studies on DNA and RNA-based genetic technologies for veterinary medicine, as outlined below.<\/p>\n According to a recent\u00a0Epoch Times report<\/a>, a 2014 USDA presentation on\u00a0Vaccination for Contagious Diseases<\/a>\u00a0states that food animals receiving vaccines are subject to \u201cmandatory withdrawal periods prior to slaughter for human consumption. Animals may not be sent to market until the withdrawal time has elapsed. During the mandatory withdrawal time vaccinated animals or products from vaccinated animals may not enter the food chain.\u00a0 The withdrawal time is determined by the country in which the vaccine is licensed and stated in the product license.\u201d\u00a0 As the Epoch Times report notes, the USDA recognizes that there must be a waiting time between vaccination and slaughter for human consumption due to risks of contaminating the food supply.\u00a0 The USDA presentation\u00a0does not<\/em>, however, acknowledge DNA or RNA-based biologics, but the same standard of waiting times likely applies, as evidenced by\u00a0Merck\u2019s RNA vaccine for pigs<\/a>, which states \u201cDo not vaccinate within 21 days before slaughter.\u201d\u00a0 However,\u00a0Dr. Peter McCullough notes<\/a>\u00a0that mRNA technology \u201cis far more durable than we ever could\u2019ve imagined. \u00a0It lasts in the human body for months unchanged.\u201d\u00a0 Therefore, even with standard wait times, Dr. McCullough believes it is conceivable that mRNA technology administered to food animals could contaminate the food supply.<\/p>\n With that said, the Epoch Times report found \u201czero\u00a0<\/em>peer-reviewed studies looking into the transmissibility of mRNA vaccines from livestock to humans via either milk or meat.\u201d\u00a0 Dr. Peter McCullough\u00a0has warned<\/a>\u00a0that developers of novel vaccine technologies for veterinary medicine are \u201cblinded with infatuation for molecular biology and have lost sight of biological product safety in the food supply\u201d adding that they have failed to acknowledge the \u201cpossibility of collateral impact to humans.\u201d\u00a0 In addition, Dr. McCullough\u00a0has raised<\/a>\u00a0concerns regarding transmissibility based on a\u00a0recent study<\/a>\u00a0which loaded cow\u2019s milk with mRNA, and by consuming the milk, mice were successfully administered a Covid vaccine.\u00a0 Dr. McCullough points out the \u201cconsiderable ethical issues\u201d this research presents, with a large segment of the public having \u201cstrong objections to mRNA in the food supply, particularly if it was done surreptitiously or with minimal labelling\/warnings.\u201d<\/p>\n The required labeling for meat, dairy and egg products is not transparent about possible exposure to DNA or RNA-based veterinary biologics.\u00a0 The USDA does, however, require \u201cBioengineered<\/a>\u201d labeling for foods that \u201ccontain detectable genetic material that has been modified through certain lab techniques and cannot be created through conventional breeding or found in nature.\u201d\u00a0 It is unclear whether the USDA\u2019s\u00a0testing process<\/a>\u00a0for \u201cdetectable genetic material\u201d is capable of picking up traces of genetic material from biologics used in veterinary medicine.<\/p>\n Moreover, the USDA\u2019s \u201cOrganic<\/a>\u201d labeling does appear to permit vaccines for livestock used for meat, dairy and eggs, though the\u00a0requirements<\/a>\u00a0state that animals must not be given hormones or antibiotics.\u00a0 A\u00a02013 Agricultural Marketing Service document<\/a>\u00a0states that \u201corganic livestock must be: \u2013 Produced without genetic engineering.\u201d\u00a0 However, the same document goes on to say that \u201cOnly a few drugs, such as vaccines,\u00a0are allowed<\/em>\u201d for organically raised livestock.<\/p>\n Furthermore, in many cases, labeling is not clear about the country from which meats originate.\u00a0Country of Origin Labeling (COOL)<\/a>\u00a0requirements were\u00a0dropped for beef and pork<\/a>\u00a0in 2016.\u00a0 COOL requirements remain in place for lamb, goat, chicken, and fish.\u00a0 Additionally, USDA regulations on meat, poultry and eggs have enabled \u201cProduct of USA\u201d labeling for animals born and raised in\u00a0other countries<\/em>\u00a0and only\u00a0processed<\/em>\u00a0in the U.S.\u00a0 However, in March 2023, the\u00a0USDA proposed a new rule<\/a>\u00a0to restrict labeling for \u201cProduct of USA\u201d or \u201cMade in the USA\u201d to be used on \u201cmeat, poultry and egg products\u00a0only<\/em>\u00a0when they are derived from animals born, raised, slaughtered and processed in the United States.\u201d<\/p>\n1. What are the different terms used for DNA or RNA-based veterinary biologics?<\/h5>\n
\n
2. How do DNA or RNA-based veterinary biologics work?<\/h5>\n
3. Which agency approves veterinary biologics?<\/h5>\n
4. Which DNA or RNA-based biologics have been approved for food animals?<\/h5>\n
Chickens<\/h6>\n
\n
Cows<\/h6>\n
\n
Fish<\/h6>\n
\n
Pigs<\/h6>\n
\n
5. Is there ongoing research into DNA or RNA-based veterinary biologics?<\/h5>\n
\n
6. Is it possible for mRNA vaccines in livestock to contaminate meat, dairy or egg products?<\/h5>\n
7. Are there labeling requirements for meats, dairy or eggs that may have been contaminated by DNA or RNA-based veterinary biologics?<\/h5>\n