{"id":334845,"date":"2023-01-26T16:20:23","date_gmt":"2023-01-26T21:20:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/?p=334845"},"modified":"2023-01-26T00:11:51","modified_gmt":"2023-01-26T05:11:51","slug":"vaxxing-covid-and-international-mortality-rates-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/2023\/01\/vaxxing-covid-and-international-mortality-rates-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Vaxxing, Covid, and International Mortality Rates"},"content":{"rendered":"

by Ron Unz, The Unz Review<\/a>:<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Many have declared that our alternative webzine features some of the most controversial content published anywhere on the Internet, notably including the explosive articles in my own lengthy\u00a0American Pravda series<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the global Covid epidemic has been the dominant issue of the last three years, generating more controversy than any other topic, at least prior to the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine war.<\/span><\/p>\n

TRUTH LIVES on at\u00a0https:\/\/sgtreport.tv\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Yet oddly enough, with one crucial exception\u2014the origins of the virus<\/a>\u2014my own Covid views have been remarkably mainstream and humdrum, not too far from what I\u2019ve seen in the pages of the\u00a0New York Times<\/em>\u00a0and the\u00a0Economist<\/em>. This situation had naturally provoked outrage in many of our regular readers, who had often had been drawn to our website because they automatically rejected everything that the mainstream media promoted.<\/span><\/p>\n

The conflict was especially severe with regard to the vaxxing controversy, and I\u2019d guess that 95% of our readers vocal on the subject were anti-vaxxers, often extremely fervent ones. Nearly all of our regular writers and columnists who focused on that topic also fell into that same category, including Mike Whitney, Paul Craig Roberts, Linh Dinh, Gilad Atzmon, Israel Shamir, C.J. Hopkins, and several other contributors. But during my decades of political activism, I\u2019ve frequently been in a small minority, sometimes standing almost alone on an important position, so I wasn\u2019t particularly disturbed when this happened yet again in the pages of my own webzine, especially since I wasn\u2019t particularly interested in the vaxxing issue.<\/span><\/p>\n

Various other alt-writers or activists privately told me that they actually shared my views, but were very reluctant to say so lest they be swarmed and vilified by a horde of militant anti-vaxxers or even risk burning bridges with longtime friends and allies. Steve Sailer, our leading blogger, maintained his strongly pro-vaxx position, but only very rarely raised the issue since whenever he did so he would always be blasted by many of his own commenters. Vaxxing had become an ultra-touchy subject.<\/span><\/p>\n

Refusing to conceal my views, in mid-2021 I published a long critique of the anti-vaxxing case, and every six months or so followed it up with another one. These functioned as powerful lightning rods, drawing vast waves of attacks by agitated anti-vaxxers, which eventually totaled close to 10,000 comments and perhaps a couple of million words. Indeed, some anti-vaxxers claimed that our lightly-moderated website had soon accumulated the largest body of anti-vaxxing content found anywhere on the Internet, thereby attracting anti-vaxxers from far and wide who sought detailed support for their views.<\/span><\/p>\n

But all the mounting statistical evidence seemed to confirm my original skepticism, and each of my articles was somewhat more firm in drawing those conclusions than the preceding one.<\/span><\/p>\n