{"id":331888,"date":"2023-01-04T13:00:39","date_gmt":"2023-01-04T18:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/?p=331888"},"modified":"2023-01-03T23:22:00","modified_gmt":"2023-01-04T04:22:00","slug":"what-the-anthrax-crisis-of-2001-and-covid-pandemic-have-in-common","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/2023\/01\/what-the-anthrax-crisis-of-2001-and-covid-pandemic-have-in-common\/","title":{"rendered":"What the Anthrax \u2018Crisis\u2019 of 2001 and COVID Pandemic Have in Common"},"content":{"rendered":"
by Dr. Joseph Mercola, Childrens Health Defense<\/a>:<\/em><\/p>\n The manufactured anthrax crisis of 2001 initiated the PATRIOT Act, one of the most severe compromises of our personal freedoms up to that point. Now, the COVID-19 pandemic is being used to take away even more freedoms.<\/p>\n Story at a glance:<\/strong><\/p>\n TRUTH LIVES on at\u00a0https:\/\/sgtreport.tv\/<\/a><\/p>\n Dr. Meryl Nass<\/a>\u00a0is a physician in Ellsworth, Maine, who in previous interviews has helped us understand the unforeseen consequences of mass vaccination \u2014 consequences that could end up impacting public health in a very negative way. Here, she discusses what she\u2019s been working on for decades, and how it relates to this current pandemic.<\/p>\n An outspoken supporter of health freedom, Nass provided scientifically referenced testimony to the Massachusetts legislature, Dec. 3, 2019, when it was considering legislation to eliminate the religious vaccine exemption.<\/p>\n This is now more relevant than ever, considering there is talk, worldwide, about implementing more or less mandatory vaccination against\u00a0COVID-19<\/a>.<\/p>\n In that\u00a0testimony<\/a>, reported online in detail by Health Impact News, Nass pointed out that:<\/p>\n \u201cThere is no crisis (no epidemic of deaths or disabilities) from infectious diseases caused by lack of vaccinations \u2026 The elephant in the auditorium today is\u00a0Pharma profits<\/a>\u00a0\u2026<\/p>\n \u201cThe pharmaceutical industry has undertaken a very ambitious campaign to legislate away vaccine exemptions in the United States and Canada. France, Italy and Germany have rescinded vaccine exemptions too, suggesting the campaign is worldwide \u2026<\/p>\n \u201cIt has been claimed that vaccines are, by nature, extremely safe. Yet vaccines are usually injected, bypassing all the body\u2019s natural barriers. Even minute contamination or inadequate microbial inactivation can maim or kill \u2026 Vaccines have caused many autoimmune disorders, from Guillain-Barre syndrome to narcolepsy \u2026<\/p>\n \u201cVaccines appear safe because the immediate side effects are usually mild and temporary. Serious vaccine side effects often take weeks or months to surface, and by then it is difficult to know what caused them \u2026<\/p>\n \u201cA 2009 European swine flu vaccine (GSK\u2019s Pandemrix) caused over 1,300 cases of severe narcolepsy, mostly in adolescents. This vaccine was linked to narcolepsy because 15 times the usual number of narcolepsy cases suddenly appeared in clinics \u2026<\/p>\n \u201cIt should be apparent, but isn\u2019t: Government waivers of vaccine liability discourage manufacturers from ensuring that the vaccines they sell are as safe and effective as possible.<\/p>\n \u201cThe removal of vaccine exemptions, combined with liability waivers for vaccine side effects and recently loosened standards for licensing vaccines, create a highly toxic mix.\u201d<\/p>\n Nass goes on to cite statistics showing why the claim that draconian laws are required to control the \u201ccrisis\u201d of vaccine-preventable diseases is false. She also points out that:<\/p>\n \u201cThe bedrock expectation of medical ethics is that patients must give\u00a0informed consent<\/a>\u00a0for all medical procedures, including vaccines. Informed consent means that patients must be informed about the procedure, have the right to refuse, and may not be coerced to accept it.<\/p>\n \u201cIsn\u2019t withholding an education an extreme form of coercion? Without any discussion of its moral or ethical dimensions by media, medical societies or government officials, the requirement for informed consent for medical procedures, including vaccinations, vanishes in the blink of an eye when patients are not allowed the right to refuse.\u201d<\/p>\n\n
\n