{"id":330778,"date":"2022-12-25T23:59:54","date_gmt":"2022-12-26T04:59:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/?p=330778"},"modified":"2022-12-24T01:37:11","modified_gmt":"2022-12-24T06:37:11","slug":"least-qualified-candidates-selected-for-world-health-orgs-radiofrequency-fields-rf-and-health-risks-task-group","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/2022\/12\/least-qualified-candidates-selected-for-world-health-orgs-radiofrequency-fields-rf-and-health-risks-task-group\/","title":{"rendered":"Least Qualified Candidates Selected for World Health Org\u2019s Radiofrequency Fields (RF) and Health Risks Task Group"},"content":{"rendered":"
by B.N. Frank, Activist Post<\/a>:<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Decades of research has already determined that\u00a0exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF)<\/a>\u00a0\u2013 including from radiofrequency (RF) aka wireless radiation (also referred to as \u201cWi-Fi\u201d) \u2013 is biologically and environmentally harmful.\u00a0 Sources include\u00a0cell phones<\/a>, cell towers,\u00a05G<\/a>, \u201csmart\u201d appliances,\u00a0\u201csmart\u201d wireless wearables<\/a>, utility\u00a0\u201csmart\u201d meters<\/a>, and more! Scientists with The World Health Organization (WHO) have\u00a0referenced harm from exposure before<\/a>\u00a0but the agency continues to not take much of a stand on this (see\u00a01<\/a>,\u00a02<\/a>).\u00a0 That seems unlikely change at least for now.<\/p>\n TRUTH LIVES on at\u00a0https:\/\/sgtreport.tv\/<\/a><\/p>\n From\u00a0Environmental Health Trust:<\/a><\/p>\n