{"id":330778,"date":"2022-12-25T23:59:54","date_gmt":"2022-12-26T04:59:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/?p=330778"},"modified":"2022-12-24T01:37:11","modified_gmt":"2022-12-24T06:37:11","slug":"least-qualified-candidates-selected-for-world-health-orgs-radiofrequency-fields-rf-and-health-risks-task-group","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/2022\/12\/least-qualified-candidates-selected-for-world-health-orgs-radiofrequency-fields-rf-and-health-risks-task-group\/","title":{"rendered":"Least Qualified Candidates Selected for World Health Org\u2019s Radiofrequency Fields (RF) and Health Risks Task Group"},"content":{"rendered":"

by B.N. Frank, Activist Post<\/a>:<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Decades of research has already determined that\u00a0exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF)<\/a>\u00a0\u2013 including from radiofrequency (RF) aka wireless radiation (also referred to as \u201cWi-Fi\u201d) \u2013 is biologically and environmentally harmful.\u00a0 Sources include\u00a0cell phones<\/a>, cell towers,\u00a05G<\/a>, \u201csmart\u201d appliances,\u00a0\u201csmart\u201d wireless wearables<\/a>, utility\u00a0\u201csmart\u201d meters<\/a>, and more! Scientists with The World Health Organization (WHO) have\u00a0referenced harm from exposure before<\/a>\u00a0but the agency continues to not take much of a stand on this (see\u00a01<\/a>,\u00a02<\/a>).\u00a0 That seems unlikely change at least for now.<\/p>\n

TRUTH LIVES on at\u00a0https:\/\/sgtreport.tv\/<\/a><\/p>\n

From\u00a0Environmental Health Trust:<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

WHO announces members of the Task Group on Radiofrequency Fields and Health Risks<\/h3>\n

Dr. Joel Moskowitz comments sent out December 2022<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

The World Health Organization (WHO) has\u00a0announced the 21 experts selected for the Task Group on Radiofrequency Fields and Health Risks.<\/a>\u00a0These individuals are responsible for examining\u00a0ten research reviews\u00a0<\/a>and making recommendations for the WHO Environmental Health Criteria (EHC) Monograph on Radio Frequency (RF) Fields and Health Risks to be published in 2023.<\/p>\n

The\u00a0list of 21 experts selected by the WHO for the Task Group on Radiofrequency Fields and Health Risks appears below along with information I compiled regarding task group members\u2019 EMF publications and affiliations with ICNIRP, the self-selected group that recommends RF exposure limits which are promoted by the WHO.<\/p>\n

Eleven\u00a0of the 21 individuals have current or past affiliations with ICNIRP. Most of the other individuals have published or presented papers defending ICNIRP\u2019s RF exposure limits. A\u00a0recent study<\/a>\u00a0found that ICNIRP heavily cites its own members\u2019 research and that of their close colleagues to support the ICNIRP exposure limits (Nordhagen and Flydal, 2022).<\/p>\n

Eight of the 21 experts have eight or fewer EMF articles listed in\u00a0EMF-Portal\u2019s archive of 37,000 publications<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Not one\u00a0of the 250 EMF scientists\u00a0who signed the\u00a0International EMF Scientist Appeal<\/a>\u00a0was selected by the WHO for the Task Group. Nor were any of these scientists selected to work on the\u00a0ten research reviews<\/a>\u00a0that the Task Group will consider. Yet. signatories of the International EMF Scientist Appeal have more than 2,000 EMF publications listed in the EMF-Portal archive.<\/p>\n

Apparently, the WHO has biased the selection of participants in the task group and the research reviews to ensure that the forthcoming WHO RF health risk monograph will support ICNIRP\u2019s weak RF exposure limits that fail to protect humans and other species from chronic exposure to low levels of radiofrequency radiation. It\u2019s no wonder that much of the public distrusts the WHO if this is how the agency proceeds to \u201cenhance its management of conflicts of interest as well as strengthen public trust and transparency.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Read More @ ActivistPost.com<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by B.N. Frank, Activist Post: Decades of research has already determined that\u00a0exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF)\u00a0\u2013 including from radiofrequency (RF) aka wireless radiation (also referred to as \u201cWi-Fi\u201d) \u2013 is biologically and environmentally harmful.\u00a0 Sources include\u00a0cell phones, cell towers,\u00a05G, \u201csmart\u201d appliances,\u00a0\u201csmart\u201d wireless wearables, utility\u00a0\u201csmart\u201d meters, and more! Scientists with The World Health Organization (WHO) have\u00a0referenced […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[145046],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330778"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=330778"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330778\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=330778"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=330778"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=330778"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}