{"id":327491,"date":"2022-12-02T12:40:27","date_gmt":"2022-12-02T17:40:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/?p=327491"},"modified":"2022-12-02T00:04:25","modified_gmt":"2022-12-02T05:04:25","slug":"banking-on-a-shot-in-the-dark","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/2022\/12\/banking-on-a-shot-in-the-dark\/","title":{"rendered":"Banking on a Shot in the Dark"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>by Dr. Joseph Mercola, <a href=\"https:\/\/articles.mercola.com\/sites\/articles\/archive\/2022\/12\/01\/banking-on-a-shot-in-the-dark.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mercola<\/a>:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft\" style=\"width: 35%;\" src=\"https:\/\/encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com\/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRSuszqwAZ885QxequLo4aDnGOWsLVtTibRhw&amp;usqp=CAU\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<h5 id=\"expanderHead\" data-jsid=\"expanderHead\">STORY AT-A-GLANCE<\/h5>\n<div id=\"expanderContent\" data-jsid=\"expanderContent\">\n<ul>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_0\">In recent months, two Pfizer officials have bragged about moving vaccine science forward at a speed that disallows proper scientific protocols from being followed, and the release of reformulated mRNA COVID boosters without testing is now the norm<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_1\">In November 2022, recently retired head of vaccine R&amp;D at Pfizer, Kathrin Jansen, said \u201cwe flew the aeroplane while we were still building it. We couldn\u2019t wait for data, we had to do so much at risk.\u201d Pfizer compressed its vaccine development timeline from 10 years to a mere nine months by simultaneously developing and testing the product in human trials<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<p><!--more Read More--> TRUTH LIVES on at\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/sgtreport.tv\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-auth=\"NotApplicable\">https:\/\/sgtreport.tv\/<\/a><script>!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src=\"https:\/\/rumble.com\/embedJS\/u2rucl\"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+\"\/?url=\"+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+\"&args=\"+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, \"script\", \"Rumble\");<\/script><\/p>\n<div id=\"rumble_v1slwje\"><\/div>\n<p><script>\nRumble(\"play\", {\"video\":\"v1slwje\",\"div\":\"rumble_v1slwje\"});<\/script><\/p>\n<div id=\"bcr_UpdPnlStory\">\n<div id=\"bcr_pnlStoryAtAGlance\" class=\"story-glance\" data-swiftype-name=\"saag\" data-swiftype-type=\"text\">\n<div class=\"story-highlights\">\n<div id=\"expanderContent\" data-jsid=\"expanderContent\">\n<ul>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_2\">Pfizer and other COVID jab makers hid side effects by eliminating the control groups long before the studies were over<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_3\">Vaccine makers are readying to release other mRNA shots, many of which are being fast-tracked and predicted to receive authorization in months rather than years. Moderna is working on a three-in-one shot for COVID, flu and RSV (respiratory syncytial virus), and they seem to expect releasing it before clinical trials are finished<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span id=\"bcr_rptStory_cslStory_4\">Pfizer quoted and relied on data from Israel when it sought approval from the FDA, and as it turns out, the Israeli government hid information about side effects. It didn\u2019t even implement its surveillance system until a year after the shots rolled out, and when the data were analyzed, researchers concluded there were causative links between certain side effects and the jabs<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"bodytext\" class=\"bodytextdiv\" data-swiftype-name=\"postbody\" data-swiftype-type=\"text\">\n<p>In the video above, Del Bigtree with The Highwire reviews how the precautionary principle and long-standing safety guidelines in medicine have been eliminated with the COVID shots, and how data showing harms are being ignored, suppressed and manipulated to hide the truth.<\/p>\n<p>In recent months, no less than two Pfizer officials have bragged about moving vaccine science forward at a speed that virtually guarantees that proper scientific protocols will be abandoned.<\/p>\n<p>In early October 2022, during a COVID hearing in the European Parliament, Dutch member Rob Roos questioned Pfizer\u2019s president of international developed markets, Janine Small, about whether Pfizer had in fact tested and confirmed that their mRNA jab would prevent transmission prior to its rollout.<sup><span id=\"edn1\" data-hash=\"#ednref1\">1<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>Small admitted that Pfizer never tested whether their jab would prevent transmission because they had to &#8220;move at the speed of science to understand what is happening in the market \u2026 and we had to do everything at risk.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;We flew the aeroplane while we were still building it. We got creative \u2014 we couldn\u2019t wait for data, we had to do so much \u2018at risk.&#8221;<\/em>\u00a0~ Kathrin Jansen, Pfizer vaccine R&amp;D<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Then, in November 2022, recently retired head of vaccine R&amp;D at Pfizer, Kathrin Jansen, told an interviewer that &#8220;we flew the aeroplane while we were still building it.&#8221;<sup><span id=\"edn2\" data-hash=\"#ednref2\">2<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>As noted in that interview, Pfizer compressed its vaccine development timeline from 10 years to a mere nine months. Well, you cannot do that unless you cut certain corners and develop and test the product more or less simultaneously. In this case, human trials began even though the preliminary testing was extremely minimal. That\u2019s what she\u2019s talking about when she says they built the plane in midair.<\/p>\n<h2>They Did Everything at Your Risk<\/h2>\n<div class=\"MidProductAd\"><\/div>\n<p>&#8220;We got creative \u2014 we couldn\u2019t wait for data, we had to do so much \u2018at risk,\u2019&#8221; Jansen said. There are those words again \u2014 doing everything &#8220;at risk.&#8221; In other words, the risks were not part of the equation, and let\u2019s be clear, the risk they\u2019re referring to is the risk a person takes when they take the shot.<\/p>\n<p>Pfizer\u2019s primary focus was to create a shot that minimized the symptoms of infection, but aside from that, there was no time to assess side effects or long-term drawbacks of the technology, such as\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/takecontrol.substack.com\/p\/vaccinated-people-susceptible-covid-variants\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">antibody-dependent enhancement<\/a>, myocarditis, or spontaneous abortions.<\/p>\n<p>This is probably why Pfizer and the other COVID jab makers all decided to eliminate the control groups long before the studies were even over. This way, side effects could be hidden, and we see the effects of that decision now.<\/p>\n<p>Myocarditis, blood clots, lethal heart attacks, strokes, cancer and sudden death are all skyrocketing, but since there\u2019s no official control group to compare with, those trends are written off as either normal or coincidental. You\u2019ve probably seen that heart attacks are now blamed on everything from hot weather and cold showers to soil microbes in your garden, climate change and loud noises.<\/p>\n<p>So, a more accurate statement would be that Pfizer did everything &#8220;at your risk.&#8221; They risk nothing. They get paid whether the shots work or not, and they have zero liability for injuries and deaths, financial or otherwise. The person who takes on all the risk is the one who takes the shot. They could lose their health, their career, everything they own and their very life.<\/p>\n<p>Jansen admits &#8220;the mRNA platform wasn\u2019t ready for prime time&#8221; when they decided to use it, and that there were stability and formulation issues, all of which were literally decided on the fly, often based on little or no data.<\/p>\n<p>To her credit, Jansen stresses that this is &#8220;not a model for the future,&#8221; because &#8220;it\u2019s not sustainable&#8221; to be working at warp speed all the time. Unfortunately, those who are continuing this work apparently disagree, because warp speed rollout with minimal or no testing is, in fact, the new norm already.<\/p>\n<h2>Warp Speed Is the New Norm<\/h2>\n<p>We know\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/takecontrol.substack.com\/p\/covid-19-vaccine-trials-results\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">warp speed is the new norm because of a decision made by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration this past summer<\/a>. During its June 28, 2022, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meeting, they approved a bivalent COVID shot for fall 2022.<sup><span id=\"edn3\" data-hash=\"#ednref3\">3<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>With that vote, they sneaked in a whole new policy, a new framework, under which reformulated COVID shots will be treated as biologically similar to existing shots and therefore be allowed to skip clinical trials.<\/p>\n<p>During that meeting, they were originally scheduled to vote on the Future Framework policy question of whether reformulated shots should be treated as new molecular entities subject to formal review. They never addressed that policy question and instead skipped right to the vote on a bivalent COVID shot for the fall.<\/p>\n<p>By approving it, knowing there would be no time for testing and data gathering, they replaced the old evidence-based system through a sleight of hand. The bivalent shots received emergency use authorization (EUA) at the end of August 2022, based on the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/takecontrol.substack.com\/p\/bivalent-booster-testing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">antibody levels in eight mice<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Moderna, which received EUA for its bivalent booster at the same time as Pfizer, also used mice to ascertain antibody responses, but has not disclosed the number of mice used.<\/p>\n<p>So, clearly, we are still moving at warp speed, without regard for risk. And already, vaccine makers are readying to release other mRNA shots, many of which are being fast-tracked and predicted to receive authorization in months rather than years.<\/p>\n<h2>Other mRNA Approvals Expected With Little or No Data<\/h2>\n<p>For example, Moderna is working on a three-in-one shot for COVID, flu and RSV (respiratory syncytial virus), and they seem to fully expect releasing it before clinical trials are finished. As reported by CBC News:<sup><span id=\"edn4\" data-hash=\"#ednref4\">4<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Moderna is actively promoting a combined COVID-19, flu and RSV vaccine \u2026 But while a safe and effective vaccine would be welcome as Canada faces a surge in pediatric RSV cases, stubbornly high COVID hospitalizations and<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cbc.ca\/news\/health\/covid-deaths-canada-winter-2022-1.6637476\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u00a0deaths<\/a>\u00a0and steeply rising flu cases, the pharmaceutical company hasn&#8217;t released data to support the vaccine&#8217;s safety or efficacy \u2026<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>Moderna&#8217;s decision to promote its vaccine before completing Phase 3 clinical trials \u2014 in which the vaccine would be tested on a larger group as part of a randomized, double-blind study \u2014 is controversial. It&#8217;s also raised concerns from vaccine researchers and infectious diseases experts about the motivations behind prematurely marketing the shot.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u2018There&#8217;s still more questions than answers, obviously, with releases like this that come from companies without accompanying data,\u2019 said Matthew Miller, a vaccine researcher and associate professor of infectious diseases and immunology at McMaster University.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u2018I think we need to be really cautious. We have no data on safety, no data on effectiveness or efficacy or age groups. How would you handle updating various components of that vaccine? Lots and lots of questions\u2019 \u2026<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>Developing a vaccine for RSV, let alone combining one with COVID and flu, is no small feat \u2014 and the complications around dosing, timing and age considerations could pose major challenges for the vaccine maker down the road.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>\u2018Having a single formulation increases the complexity of updating that formulation annually,\u2019 said Miller \u2026 \u2018So now, instead of dealing with four flu strains, you&#8217;re adding in RSV and COVID and having a combined shot might actually be more complex in some ways than having separate formulations that are co-administered at the same time.\u2019&#8221;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In addition to fast-tracking mRNA injections for a variety of respiratory viruses, vaccine makers are also loading their pipelines with mRNA shots for diseases such as cancer, multiple sclerosis (MS), birth defects and rarer diseases.<\/p>\n<p>Curiously, while mRNA shots are being hailed as the new and improved answer for every ill, Moderna president Stephen Hoge and chief technical officer Juan Andres cashed out hundreds of millions of their stock options earlier this year,<sup><span id=\"edn5\" data-hash=\"#ednref5\">5<\/span><\/sup>\u00a0which seems odd if everything is going well and no future trouble is expected.<\/p>\n<h2>Government and Corporate Interests Have Become One<\/h2>\n<p>Aiding and abetting the circumvention of the precautionary principle are contract research firms that run medical research trials for drug companies and federal agencies alike, thereby giving the drug companies the inside track on drug approvals.<sup><span id=\"edn6\" data-hash=\"#ednref6\">6<\/span>,<\/sup><sup><span id=\"edn7\" data-hash=\"#ednref7\">7<\/span><\/sup><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/articles.mercola.com\/sites\/articles\/archive\/2022\/12\/01\/banking-on-a-shot-in-the-dark.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Read More @ Mercola.com<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Dr. Joseph Mercola, Mercola: STORY AT-A-GLANCE In recent months, two Pfizer officials have bragged about moving vaccine science forward at a speed that disallows proper scientific protocols from being followed, and the release of reformulated mRNA COVID boosters without testing is now the norm In November 2022, recently retired head of vaccine R&amp;D at [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[143421],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327491"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327491"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327491\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327491"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327491"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327491"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}