{"id":322968,"date":"2022-10-30T06:30:04","date_gmt":"2022-10-30T10:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/?p=322968"},"modified":"2022-10-29T22:16:25","modified_gmt":"2022-10-30T02:16:25","slug":"a-message-from-clintel-there-is-no-climate-emergency","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/2022\/10\/a-message-from-clintel-there-is-no-climate-emergency\/","title":{"rendered":"A Message from CLINTEL: There is No Climate Emergency"},"content":{"rendered":"

by Rhoda Wilson, Expose News<\/a>:<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The President of\u00a0Climate Intelligence (\u201cCLINTEL\u201d)<\/a>, Guus Berkhout, has published a message to all the people of the world.\u00a0 His message is simple:\u00a0There is no climate emergency<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

For decades, the public has been flooded with fear-mongering stories from climate alarmists who claim \u201ccatastrophic doom\u201d due to increasing carbon dioxide (CO2<\/sub>) levels from human activities.\u00a0 The climate alarmists deliberately cause panic, \u201ctime is running out,\u201d they claim.\u00a0 The solution, climate alarmists say, is the \u201cnet zero\u201d policy.<\/p>\n

TRUTH LIVES on at\u00a0https:\/\/sgtreport.tv\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Thousands of scientists disagree. As of 1 October 2022, more than 1,400 scientists from around the world have signed the \u2018World Climate Declaration<\/em><\/a>\u2019 which begins: \u201cClimate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific.\u201d<\/p>\n

CLINTEL has\u00a0called for an open scientific debate<\/a>, but the World Economic Forum, for example, chooses to ignore climate science and follow climate politics with its catastrophically damaging \u201cnet zero\u201d ideology.<\/p>\n

As well as CLINTEL\u2019s founder and president,\u00a0Guus Berkhout<\/a>\u00a0is a professor emeritus of geophysics and a member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW). In his message to the world below Berkhout explained why is there such a big difference between the\u00a0scaring\u00a0<\/em>climate activists\u2019 narrative and the\u00a0optimistic<\/em>\u00a0climate scientists\u2019 message who believe there is no climate emergency.<\/p>\n

A Message from Guus Berkhout, President of CLINTEL: There is No Climate Emergency<\/strong><\/h3>\n

In the past decades, the public has been flooded with fear-mongering stories, telling them that global temperatures will rise to catastrophically high levels.<\/p>\n

Climate activists claim that the cause of all this impending doom is the increasing amount of CO2<\/sub>\u00a0produced by human activities. The proposed solution is the so-called net-zero emission policy, aimed at lowering human net CO2<\/sub>\u00a0emissions to the levels of the pre-industrial era of the late 1700s.<\/p>\n

Those activists also claim that people should panic, and that time is running out: \u201cBe aware that it is five minutes to midnight, we must act without delay!\u201d Many thousands of scientists disagree; more than 1400 are CLINTEL signatories.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"
Antonio Guterres, the big boss of the UN<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"\"
Greta Thunberg, teen climate activist<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n

In his numerous \u201clast warning\u201d speeches, Antonio Guterres refers to computer simulations, not the real world. Greta Thunberg testified to the US Congress that there was\u00a0\u201cno science\u201d behind her \u201cpanic\u201d comment<\/a>.\u00a0 This information cannot be found in the media.<\/p>\n

So why is there such a big difference between the\u00a0scaring<\/em>\u00a0climate activists\u2019 narrative and the\u00a0optimistic<\/em>\u00a0climate scientists\u2019 message, who believe there is no climate emergency? Please, before you continue reading, watch our message\u00a0\u2018Consensus meet CLINTEL<\/em>\u2019:<\/p>\n

\n