Thursday, April 25, 2024

sentient - search results

If you're not happy with the results, please do another search

Funding The Control Grid Part 4: The Technology Framework

    0

    by The Sharp Edge, Corey’s Digs:

    We are building our own digital prison.  The technological panopticon developing all around us enables centralized power, control, and visibility over every aspect of our lives.  With our hard-earned taxpayer dollars and mountains of debt, we are funding the construction of a digital control grid designed to enslave us.

    This technological control grid consists of advanced computing, artificial intelligence, biotechnology, nanotechnology, CBDCs, digital IDs, 5G and a host of other emerging technologies.  The purpose of this report is to outline funding and legislation to build the technological control grid, condensed from 6,000 pages of legislation passed through the Omnibus and NDAA at the end of 2022.

    “PERSONHOOD” URGED FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCES

      0

      by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star:

      Yes you read that headline correctly: according to the following article shared by V.T., “experts” are calling for artificial intelligences to be given legal personhood status under the law:

      Experts Urge Personhood Rights for the “Conscious” AIs of the Future

      If you’re a regular reader on this website or, for that matter, a reader of the website of our colleague Catherine Austin Fitts, you’ll already be aware that one of her major theses, and hence, one of our major speculations here on this website, is that the push for the granting of legal personhood status to robots and other artificial intelligences is for tax purposes, allowing them to be taxed just like corporations, and, for that matter, “ordinary” persons like you and me.

      The Agenda’s “Net Zero” could mean “zero” of anything and everything

        0

        by Rhoda Wilson, Daily Expose:

        What does the term “Net Zero” actually mean? That nothing will be left once zero carbon has been achieved?

        By reducing carbon dioxide to nil, zero carbon, all plant life dependent for its growth on this natural gas, will die. By extension, all humans and animals dependent upon the oxygen that plants produce, via the conversion of carbon dioxide into oxygen, will also die. Basic biology reveals that is indeed the case.

        Bing Chatbot ‘Off The Rails’: Tells NYT It Would ‘Engineer A Deadly Virus, Steal Nuclear Codes’

          0

          from ZeroHedge:

          Microsoft’s Bing AI chatbot has gone full HAL, minus the murder (so far).

          While MSM journalists initially gushed over the artificial intelligence technology (created by OpenAI, which makes ChatGPT), it soon became clear that it’s not ready for prime time.

          For example, the NY Times‘ Kevin Roose wrote that while he first loved the new AI-powered Bing, he’s now changed his mind – and deems it “not ready for human contact.”

          It’s 2030, and robots have more rights than you do…

            0

            by Mark E. Jeftovic, Bombthrower:

            Now that ChatGPT has exploded onto the stage, there is renewed hype around Artificial Intelligence (AI). Whenever AI captures the public imagination, we are subjected to unrestrained conjectures around how it will inevitably take over the future and change our lives.

            We’re led to believe that AI will usher an era of hyper-intelligent overlords, so far advanced beyond our own coarse and analog cognitive skills that the existential question of the future will center around:

            Ukraine Is Sinking. Are Western Elites Bailing Out?

              0

              by Mike Whitney, The Unz Review:

              What makes the RAND Corporation’s latest report on Ukraine so significant, is not the quality of the analysis, but the fact that the nation’s most prestigious national security think-tank has taken an opposite position on the war than the Washington political class and their globalist alliesThis is a very big deal. Keep in mind, wars don’t end because the public opposes them. That is a myth. Wars end when a critical split emerges between elites that eventually leads to a change in policy. The RAND Corporation’s new report, “Avoiding a long war: US policy and the trajectory of the Russia-Ukraine conflict”, represents just such a split. It indicates that powerful elites have broken with the majority opinion because they think the current policy is hurting the United States. We believe this shift in perspective is going to gain momentum until it triggers a more-assertive demand for negotiations. In other words, the RAND report is the first step towards ending the war.