Tuesday, January 28, 2020

American vaccine researcher illegally injected patients with herpes virus in hotel rooms as part of “vaccine science” research

by Tracey Watson, Natural News:

 If you had to picture a truly evil person, who would come to mind? Adolf Hitler? Josef Mengele? Perhaps Osama bin Laden? While all three are certainly among the most evil men who have ever lived, a recent investigation by Kaiser Health News (KHN) has uncovered a different type of evil: The evil of American vaccine researcher William Halford who offered desperate patients a cure to a debilitating disease, when in fact he was treating them as nothing more than human guinea pigs.

As controversial as vaccinations are, at least there are protocols in place to limit the damage to human patients during their development. The World Health Organization’s guidelines on clinical evaluation of vaccines outlines a long and complicated process, which includes preclinical and laboratory evaluations, regulations for toxicity and safety testing, ethical considerations, at least three phases of studies followed by bridging studies, and then post-licensure studies and surveillance.

Even when researchers have meticulously followed these protocols, vaccines with dangerous side effects have still made it on to the open market. Imagine the disastrous consequences of a renegade researcher conducting secretive experiments on patients in hotel rooms in blatant violation of all U.S. vaccine safety regulations. It almost seems unbelievable, and yet that is exactly what Halford was caught doing. (Related: Discover the truth at Vaccines.news.)

Based at Southern Illinois University, Halford – who has since died of cancer – personally administered “homemade” shots of his vaccine to desperate patients at a Holiday Inn Express and a Crowne Plaza Hotel close to his SIU lab. Email correspondence and personal interviews confirm that at least eight patients (that we know of) were injected in this way on four separate occasions in 2013.

It would appear that Halford used a members-only Facebook account and the assistance of an unnamed woman, who herself had herpes and who claims Halford’s treatment cured her, to recruit willing volunteers to test his experimental vaccine on. (Related: The 13 most evil U.S. government experiments on humans.)

As a microbiologist and not a physician, it was illegal for Halford to inject patients without the supervision of either a doctor or a nurse practitioner. In addition, Halford failed to obtain written permission from his “patients” before injecting them with a live virus, as is required under federal law.

His methods also appear to have been random and shoddy, with no real consideration given to the possible effects on the recipients of his concoction.

Emails between Halford and his victims indicate that he randomly adjusted doses and the number of shots based on not much more than whim or requests from the volunteers themselves.

On September 19, 2013, for example, he wrote in an email that an “individual requested that I give him two immunizations to double the effect … one immunization per leg,” and so he did it.

In an October 2, 2013 email, Halford himself called his analysis “nothing more than an educated guess.”

He also injected all his volunteers with “150 million infectious units of the HSV-2 vaccine strain,” even though only some of the patients were infected with HSV-2, while others were carriers of the HSV-1 strain of herpes. The difference is huge; HSV-1 is known as “herpes simplex,” and can be transmitted through kissing, sharing drinks or oral sex. It exhibits itself through cold sores and fever blisters around the mouth. HSV-2, on the other hand, is generally sexually transmitted, and results in sores on the genitals, upper thighs and anus. It was, therefore, totally irresponsible of Halford to inject patients who were infected with HSV-1 with HSV-2 infectious units.

Read More @ NaturalNews.com

Australia vaccination; all doctors under the gun; minister of health keeps lying

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News:

Welcome to the Australian state of Victoria, where the minister of health, Jill Hennessy, has just put all doctors under the gun.

Vaccinating every child has become so important to Hennessey, she’s declared that a doctor who writes an exemption will be ignored. In fact, that doctor, by implication, will be considered “rogue.”

He could have his license to practice stripped. He could be prosecuted. He could be denied a way to earn a living.

Instead, in order to allow a child an exemption from taking vaccines, evidence must be shown from some sort of medical registry. How this system will work is not clear.

What is clear: In violation of privacy, all children’s medical records and history will be recorded and made available to health/government authorities, who will then see whether there is a prior incident where a child has reacted badly to a vaccine, whether the child has an allergy to vaccine ingredients (such as chicken eggs), whether there is a history of adverse vaccine reactions in the child’s family.

The government, not the child’s doctor, will decide whether vaccination can be skipped or must take place.

And because the State is firmly and irretrievably pro-vaccine, despite evidence showing vaccines are ineffective and dangerous, you can see how this plan will work out. Like sheep, children will be led into the pen where the needles are waiting.

Doctors who stand up and say no to vaccination, for any reason, will be excommunicated.

So it is now time for doctors, singly, and in groups, to stand up and speak up. Their silence is collaboration.

The Crazz Files, one of the great Australian websites exposing vaccines, is now running a piece about Meryl Dorey, a brave and brilliant woman who is the head of AVN, “Australia’s national vaccine-safety consumer health lobby group…[Dorey] has called upon Jill Hennessy, Victoria’s Health Minister, to demonstrate that, “There are no risks in vaccinating your children”.

Dorey: ““I am asking the Minister to do voluntarily what she is forcing upon children – to take the entire vaccination schedule over the next 4 years, starting with the birth dose of Hepatitis B, and continuing on to the 4-year old dose of DTPa-IPV.”

“There are currently 41 vaccinations administered to children in Australia between birth and 4 years of age – more if you are of Aboriginal or Torres-Strait Islander descent. Ms Hennessy needs to take all of these vaccines and also receive an annual flu shot as recommended for all children over the age of 6 months to show her faith in the safety of this medical procedure.”

“The terms are as follows: Minister Hennessy must undergo a complete physical from an ACNEM-trained physician who will assess her health status, do a full analysis of her bloodwork and refer her for an MRI scan to show a baseline level of her overall condition so that any vaccine-injuries can be noted should they occur. These tests must be repeated at the conclusion of the 4-year period. A small amount of each vaccine vial is to be drawn out just prior to injection to be assessed at an independent laboratory [to make sure the vaccine is standard].”

I agree completely. Let Minister of Health Hennessy prove her point that all vaccines are safe and effective. Starting now.

No more beating around the bush making claims.

DO IT.

Take all the vaccines you claim are wonderful for children.

Read More @ NoMoreFakeNews.com

50 Workers Just Fired From Health System For Refusing Vaccines

by Heather Callaghan, Activist Post:

And so it begins… A healthcare system has literally fired 50 employees – in one fell swoop – over a draconian flu jab policy

They can’t fire us all if we stand up, right? That might be the inner wishful thinking of those who refuse vaccinations while working in the healthcare system.

But as WGN9 reports:

A Minnesota-based health system has fired about 50 employees who refused to get a flu shot.

Essentia Health announced last month that employees would be required to get vaccinated for influenza unless they received a religious or medical exemption.

The system claimed that it was trying to “keep patients from getting sick at its 15 hospitals and 75 clinics in Minnesota, Idaho, North Dakota and Wisconsin.”

From WGN9:

Essentia says 99 percent of the company’s 13,900 eligible employees had gotten the shot, received an exemption or were getting an exemption by the Monday deadline.

The United Steelworkers filed an injunction to try to delay the policy, but a federal judge denied the request. Minnesota Public Radio reports at least two other unions are filing grievances on behalf of workers who lost their jobs.

How do you know when something is truly for the benefit of the people? Why, when you are forced to choose it or lose your entire livelihood, of course!

Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Scientific Papers Summarized for Parents and Researchers

We’d like to point out that we have heard from workers in other healthcare systems who are being forced to get shots or either lose their jobs or wear masks for over four months of the year. Please remember that it is not just nurses and doctors who are being coerced, but support assistance workers and other department workers in the hospital systems.

Obviously, no one should be forced to take into their bodies any substance or face losing everything. Although the system enforcing these mandates claims it’s for public health, this cannot be the case considering the almost complete lack of efficacy of flu vaccines. (See the Cochrane Collaboration’s review.)

The hospital systems could protect their patients better by cutting down on preventable medical errors which are the third leading cause of death in the U.S.! They could come up with reasonable methods to prevent superbugs and antibiotic resistance among their vulnerable patients.

Read More @ ActivistPost.com

Young Mother In California Threatened With Arrest At A Bus Stop For Not Vaccinating Her Children

by Michael Snyder, The Economic Collapse Blog:

Could you imagine being threatened by law enforcement authorities over vaccine records as you are waiting with your children for the school bus?  This is something that literally just happened to one young mother down in California.  One morning she walked her kids to the bus stop and she was approached by an official from the Claremont school district and a police officer.  In very intimidating fashion, they began questioning her about whether or not her children had been vaccinated.  When she refused to answer and started recording the interaction they walked away, but that wasn’t the end of it.  Later she called the police department and explained what was going on, and she was told that she could be arrested for refusing to vaccinate her children.

You can see the video for yourself on Facebook right here.  It has already been watched more than 159,000 times, and we need to get this out to as many people as we possibly can.  The following is the description that Porsha Rasheed posted along with the video…

Please watch this Video and share I am. I am being set up by the Claremont school district to be arrested and they are trying to force me to give my child immunization shots! I woke up this morning and walked my kids to the bus stop like I always do. Guess who was waiting the Claremont police department along with another man asking me about my child’s shots! I called the police department to make a complaint for harassment and was told by the sergeant, that me not giving my kids shots is a criminal act and that I will be arrested. This is why they were at the bus stop to try to incriminate me by me attempting to them that my son does not have any shots. This is crazy!! I want the world to know if I am arrested this is why! I will follow up with the facts!!!!

This is the kind of thing that health freedom advocates were warning would happen in California.

In 2016, a new law went into effect that mandates that all children be fully vaccinated unless they have been granted a medical exemption…

The law requires all children entering day care, kindergarten or 7th grade to be vaccinated unless they have a medical exemption. It also gives physicians broader discretion to grant medical exemptions based on a child’s condition or family history. The law eliminated personal belief exemptions, which experts say created hotspots of unvaccinated kids and contributed to the spread of contagious diseases.

Medical exemptions were rare before the law took effect last summer. Between 2000 and 2015, just .2 percent or less of California kindergartners had one each year. After the law took effect in 2016, the number of kindergartners statewide with a medical exemption increased threefold.

Fortunately, some doctors are fighting back against this draconian new law by granting medical exemptions to parents that do not want to submit to forced vaccination.

The vaccine industry considers California’s new law to be a model for the nation, and they are going to push hard to get laws like this in all 50 states.

So what can we do?

Well, first of all you need to know your rights as a parent.  Most states still allow religious vaccine exemptions, and you can see a sample letter on Health Freedom Idaho’s website right here.

Read More @ TheEconomicCollapseBlog.com

Why Were Vatican And RC Church Hierarchies NOT Unnerved About Infertility “Ingredients” In WHO’s African Tetanus Vaccine Campaign?

0

by Catherine Frompovich, Activist Post:

The Roman Catholic Church has strict rules and unyielding dogma regarding religious beliefs and congregants practices but, unfortunately, seems to turn a deaf ear and a blind eye and subscribes to “going along to get along” especially regarding the pseudosciences regarding GMO ‘phood’ [1], and what the medical industry submits as ‘gospel truth’ when it comes to pharmaceutical vaccines!

Regarding GMOs:

The same Congregation also decided that Eucharistic matter made with genetically modified organisms can be considered valid matter (cf. Letter to the Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, 9 December 2013, Prot. N. 89/78 – 44897). [1]

Relating to vaccines, then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who became Pope Benedict XVI (2005-2013), sent a request to investigate vaccines to the Sacred Congregation of the Doctrine of Faith in order to answer questions posed by Mrs. Debra L. Vinnedge, Executive Director of Children of God for Life, in Largo, Florida.

In June of 2005, Mrs. Vinnedge received a reply on the letterhead of the Pontificia Academia Pro Vitosaying [5]:

On June 4, 2003, you wrote to His Eminence Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, with a copy of this letter forwarded to me, asking to the Sacred Congregation of the Doctrine of Faith a clarification about the liceity [sic] of vaccinating children with vaccines prepared using cell lines derived from aborted human fetuses.

As part of Mrs. Vinnedge’s answer, included was the English translation of “MORAL REFLECTIONS ON VACCINES PREPARED FROM CELLS DERIVED FROM ABORTED HUMAN FOETUSES,” which ended with this seemingly “politically-correct” babble:

In any case, there remains a moral duty to continue to fight and to employ every lawful means in order to make life difficult for the pharmaceutical industries which act unscrupulously and unethically. However, the burden of this important battle cannot and must not fall on innocent children and on the health situation of the population – especially with regard to pregnant women.

To summarize, it must be confirmed that:

  • there is a grave responsibility to use alternative vaccines and to make a conscientious objection with regard to those which have moral problems;

[CJF: Aren’t the RC Church and its congregants included in “those which have moral problems”?]

  • as regards the vaccines without an alternative, the need to contest so that others may be prepared must be reaffirmed, as should be the lawfulness of using the former in the meantime insomuch as is necessary in order to avoid a serious risk not only for one’s own children but also, and perhaps more specifically, for the health conditions of the population as a whole – especially for pregnant women;

[CJF: apparently the Holy See is into Big Pharma’s consensus science!]

  • the lawfulness of the use of these vaccines should not be misinterpreted as a declaration of the lawfulness of their production, marketing and use, but is to be understood as being a passive material cooperation and, in its mildest and remotest sense, also active, morally justified as an extrema ratio due to the necessity to provide for the good of one’s children and of the people who come in contact with the children (pregnant women);  [CJF emphasis]

[CJF: The Vatican demonstrates an obvious disregard for what has been reported to the CDC’s VAERS system about spontaneous abortions and miscarriages [2] after pregnant women are receiving vaccines! [3] ]

  • such cooperation occurs in a context of moral coercion of the conscience of parents, who are forced to choose to act against their conscience or otherwise, to put the health of their children and of the population as a whole at risk. This is an unjust alternative choice, which must be eliminated as soon as possible.

[CJF: However, the Vatican and the RC Church have not been outspoken about nor instituted an alternative choice campaign, which could have dramatic impact considering the RC Church has a global membership/congregation of approximately 1,253,926,000 [4].  That represents almost one-seventh of the world’s population, which could make a significant difference regarding vaccine pseudoscience IFthe RC Church were to act upon legitimate science and not “go along to get along.”  The Kenya hCG-laced-TT-vaccine problem should have been a huge wakeup call for the RC Church, but apparently Church fathers decided it wasn’t.]

However, the hCG issue resurfaced recently, which could propel the Vatican to act if parishioners demand corrective actions from the Vatican and the Church’s hierarchy based upon real, not pseudoscience generated by vaccine manufacturers.

An October 27, 2017 paper titled HCF Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1103937  Open Access Library Journal was published, which confirmed what Roman Catholic Bishops in Kenya were reporting, i.e., an infertility ingredient in the tetanus vaccines being given to child-bearing-age females in Kenya!

Abstract

In 1993, WHO announced a “birth-control vaccine” for “family planning”. Published research shows that by 1976 WHO researchers had conjugated tetanus toxoid (TT) with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) producing a “birth-control” vaccine. Conjugating TT with hCG causes pregnancy hormones to be attacked by the immune system. Expected results are abortions in females already pregnant and/or infertility in recipients not yet impregnated. Repeated inoculations prolong infertility. Currently WHO researchers are working on more potent anti-fertility vaccines using recombinant DNA. WHO publications show a long-range purpose to reduce population growth in unstable “less developed countries”. By November 1993 Catholic publications appeared saying an abortifacient vaccine was being used as a tetanus prophylactic. In November 2014, the Catholic Church asserted that such a program was underway in Kenya. Three independent Nairobi accredited biochemistry laboratories tested samples from vials of the WHO tetanus vaccine being used in March 2014 and found hCG where none should be present. [CJF emphasis]

[CJF: Why the RC Church didn’t pursue the above infertility ‘subterfuge’ in WHO-sponsored vaccines further for definitive action should be considered, in my opinion, a “sin of serious omission,” which needs to be accounted for and by the Vatican and the Church hierarchy.  Can that omission be considered in the same probability as sweeping Church clergy pedophilia under various ‘clerical rugs’ for decades?  Where’s accountability on the part of the RC Church with regard to an apparent New World Order pro-eugenics strategy for population control?]

The Conclusion section of the newly-published research paper states:

5. Conclusion

Laboratory testing of the TT vaccine used in the WHO Kenya campaign 2013- 2015 showed that some of the vials contained a TT/βhCG conjugate consistent with the WHO’s goal to develop one or more anti-fertility vaccines to reduce the rate of population growth, especially in targeted LDCs such as Kenya. While it is impossible to be certain how the βhCG got into the Kenya vaccine vials testing positive for it, the WHO’s deep history of research on antifertility vaccines conjugating βhCG with TT (and other pathogens), in our opinion, makes the WHO itself the most plausible source of the βhCG conjugate found in samples of “tetanus” vaccine being used in Kenya in 2014. Moreover, given that all vaccine manufacturers and vaccine testing laboratories must be WHO certified, their responsibility for whatever has happened in the Kenyan immunization program can hardly be overemphasized[CJF emphasis]

Since mainstream news agencies and media currently are extremely willing to expose the “Harvey Weinstein” syndrome and the medical profession and Big Pharma’s “opioid dependency creation,” what’s preventing them from declaring “open season” on the World Health Organization’s hidden vaccine agendas for global population control?

Read More @ ActivistPost.com

BOMBSHELL science paper documents the depopulation chemical covertly spiked into vaccines

0

by Mike Adams, Natural News:

ust days after the release of a jaw-dropping video lecture called the Science Agenda to Exterminate Blacks, a bombshell science paper has emerged that confirms the use of covert sterilization chemicals in World Health Organization vaccines deployed in Africa. Entitled, “HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World,” the paper documents the covert deployment of an infertility chemical in vaccines that are administered to young black women in Kenya:

Oller, J.W., Shaw, C.A., Tomljenovic, L., Karanja, S.K., Ngare, W., Clement, F.M. and Pillette, J.R. (2017), HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World. Open Access Library Journal, 4: e3937.
https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103937

The paper confirms exactly what Natural News reported earlier in the week: That a covert depopulation program is being run by the World Health Organization, targeting Africans for extermination via infertility chemicals administered under the guise of “vaccines.” These vaccines, notably, contain chemicals that are administered without the informed consent of the women being injected. In fact, the women are deliberately lied to and told the injections are meant to “protect your health.” But the real reason for the shots is to exterminate blacks in the name of “science” and “medicine.”

I’ve detailed all this in this powerful one-hour lecture that’s already getting rave reviews across the ‘net. Watch the full lecture below, and visit Eugenics.news for more coverage of race-targeted extermination efforts being waged today under the banners of “science” and “medicine.”

GreenMedInfo nails it in story by Jafferey Jaxen

A solid analysis of all this comes from Jafferey Jaxen writing for GreenMedInfo. That story, republished here with credit, is entitled, “CAUGHT: WHO’s Anti-fertility Vaccination Program Chronicled In New Paper.”

Has the World Health Organization (WHO) been purposely misleading women in developing countries into thinking they are protecting them and their future children from tetanus while in fact robbing women of their fertility and the very children they wanted to protect? 

A highly concerning new paper has been published in The Open Access Library Journal titled, “HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World.” The implications of the information contained within this paper, if true, have the potential to shift paradigms and threaten the hegemony of global organizations who are ostensibly concerned about the health and welfare of the world’s populations. What findings can threaten to do such a thing?

To understand the full breadth of the findings, it is first important to know some key historical facts. The World Health Organization was established in 1945 and immediately embraced the tenet of family planning, which was later referred to as “planned parenthood as a necessity for world health.”

Around 1972, the WHO research program for developing a birth-control vaccinecommenced. The WHO birth-control vaccine involved linking the tetanus toxoid (TT) with the beta portion of the human pregnancy hormone chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). This combination directs the immune system to produce antibodies not only against TT but also against hCG, causing miscarriages in already pregnant recipients and infertility in those not yet pregnant. The results were announced and celebrated by WHO researchers as the first “anti-fertility” vaccine in 1976 during a meeting of the US National Academy of Sciences.

Around the same time, the US National Security Study Memorandum 200, also known as the Kissinger Report, became official US policy in 1975, calling for reducing the population grown in “less developed countries” to near zero by means of “reducing fertility.”

Fast forward to 2010 when Bill Gates, whose father headed up Planned Parenthood after WWII, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation officially announced they would be committing $10 billion to help accomplish the WHO population reduction goals in part with “new vaccines.” One month later, Gates appeared in his now infamous Innovating to Zero TED talk where he made the statement:

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.”

Fast forward again to 2014 when the Kenya Conference of Bishops (KCCB) issued a press release that made mainstream news, alleging that the WHO was secretly using its birth-control vaccine during its anti-tetanus vaccination campaign in Kenya from 2013 to 2015. Was there proof, beyond the long history of questionable policies, statements, and actions by the WHO and its financier?

Read More @ NaturalNews.com

BOMBSHELL science paper documents the depopulation chemical covertly spiked into vaccines

by Mike Adams, Natural News:

Just days after the release of a jaw-dropping video lecture called the Science Agenda to Exterminate Blacks, a bombshell science paper has emerged that confirms the use of covert sterilization chemicals in World Health Organization vaccines deployed in Africa. Entitled, “HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World,” the paper documents the covert deployment of an infertility chemical in vaccines that are administered to young black women in Kenya:

Oller, J.W., Shaw, C.A., Tomljenovic, L., Karanja, S.K., Ngare, W., Clement, F.M. and Pillette, J.R. (2017), HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World. Open Access Library Journal, 4: e3937.
https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103937

The paper confirms exactly what Natural News reported earlier in the week: That a covert depopulation program is being run by the World Health Organization, targeting Africans for extermination via infertility chemicals administered under the guise of “vaccines.” These vaccines, notably, contain chemicals that are administered without the informed consent of the women being injected. In fact, the women are deliberately lied to and told the injections are meant to “protect your health.” But the real reason for the shots is to exterminate blacks in the name of “science” and “medicine.”

I’ve detailed all this in this powerful one-hour lecture that’s already getting rave reviews across the ‘net. Watch the full lecture below, and visit Eugenics.news for more coverage of race-targeted extermination efforts being waged today under the banners of “science” and “medicine.”

GreenMedInfo nails it in story by Jafferey Jaxen

A solid analysis of all this comes from Jafferey Jaxen writing for GreenMedInfo. That story, republished here with credit, is entitled, “CAUGHT: WHO’s Anti-fertility Vaccination Program Chronicled In New Paper.”

Has the World Health Organization (WHO) been purposely misleading women in developing countries into thinking they are protecting them and their future children from tetanus while in fact robbing women of their fertility and the very children they wanted to protect? 

A highly concerning new paper has been published in The Open Access Library Journal titled, “HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World.” The implications of the information contained within this paper, if true, have the potential to shift paradigms and threaten the hegemony of global organizations who are ostensibly concerned about the health and welfare of the world’s populations. What findings can threaten to do such a thing?

To understand the full breadth of the findings, it is first important to know some key historical facts. The World Health Organization was established in 1945 and immediately embraced the tenet of family planning, which was later referred to as “planned parenthood as a necessity for world health.”

Around 1972, the WHO research program for developing a birth-control vaccinecommenced. The WHO birth-control vaccine involved linking the tetanus toxoid (TT) with the beta portion of the human pregnancy hormone chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). This combination directs the immune system to produce antibodies not only against TT but also against hCG, causing miscarriages in already pregnant recipients and infertility in those not yet pregnant. The results were announced and celebrated by WHO researchers as the first “anti-fertility” vaccine in 1976 during a meeting of the US National Academy of Sciences.

Around the same time, the US National Security Study Memorandum 200, also known as the Kissinger Report, became official US policy in 1975, calling for reducing the population grown in “less developed countries” to near zero by means of “reducing fertility.”

Fast forward to 2010 when Bill Gates, whose father headed up Planned Parenthood after WWII, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation officially announced they would be committing $10 billion to help accomplish the WHO population reduction goals in part with “new vaccines.” One month later, Gates appeared in his now infamous Innovating to Zero TED talk where he made the statement:

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.”

Read More @ NaturalNews.com

The great flu vaccine hoax: new evidence

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News:

Apparently, the powers-that-be want everyone to take the seasonal flu vaccine out of loyalty and blind faith. Because actual science reveals the hoax.

A new study, published in the PLOS Journal on 10/23, by contributing authors from the Scripps Institute and the University of Pennsylvania, is titled: “A structural explanation for the low effectiveness of the seasonal influenza H3N2 vaccine.”

Oops. Low effectiveness? The public has been taught to believe the vaccine is quite effective.

Here is a key quote from the study: “It is common to use chicken eggs for culturing clinical isolates and for large-scale production of vaccines. However, influenza virus often mutates to adapt to being grown in chicken eggs, which can influence antigenicity and hence vaccine effectiveness.”

Translation: The virus in the vaccine mutates, in the chicken eggs, and therefore the patient’s immune system responds to the wrong version of the flu virus.

Here is another quote: “Our study describes a mechanism [that explains]…the low influenza vaccine effectiveness and reaffirms the urgency for replacing the egg-based production of influenza vaccines.”

It gets worse, far worse.

Here is evidence I have cited for several years now. It comes from a 2013 review:

Dr. Peter Doshi, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals a monstrosity.

As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.

This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.

So they don’t have the flu.

Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly prevent all those “flu cases” that aren’t flu cases.

The vaccine couldn’t possibly work.

The vaccine isn’t designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.

Here’s the exact quote from Peter Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):

“…even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} are found to be influenza positive.

“…It’s no wonder so many people feel that ‘flu shots’ don’t work: for most flus, they can’t.”

Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren’t the flu.

Read More @ NoMoreFakeNews.com

New vaccines will permanently alter your DNA

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News:

A news story tend to move in waves. It appears, retreats, and then appears in an altered form—replete with lies, cover stories, and embedded confusion. That’s why I’m keeping this story alive in its stark essence—

The reference is the New York Times, 3/9/15, “Protection Without a Vaccine.” It describes the frontier of research. Here are key quotes that illustrate the use of synthetic genes to “protect against disease,” while changing the genetic makeup of humans. This is not science fiction:

“By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”

“’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”

“The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned.” [That was nearly two years ago.]

“I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”

Here is the punchline: “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”

Read that again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.”

Alteration of the human genetic makeup.

Not just a “visit.” Permanent residence. And once a person’s DNA is changed, doesn’t it follow that he/she will pass on that change to the next generation of children, and so on, down the line?

The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:

“Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.”

Yes, some people might be leery. If they have two or three working brain cells.

This is genetic roulette with a loaded gun.

Read More @ NoMoreFakeNews.com

BIGGER THAN JFK FILES: HHS VACCINE HARM COVERED UP

by David Knight, Infowars:

Whistleblower reveals HHS misconduct

Del Bigtree, producer of VAXXED, joins David Knight to blow the whistle on misconduct by HHS (Health & Human Services). When the federal government took away our right to sue vaccine companies, giving them liability immunity, HHS was tasked as the sole means of protecting the public. But they don’t test vaccines like drugs are tested, they don’t allow discovery in their “court”, they don’t even keep records of those injured. The cover-up is bigger than JFK and may cost you and your children your health, even your life.

To read more about this topic click here.

Below is an article by Jefferey Jaxen that details the HHS cover-up.

It’s official! The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and, by extension, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have been put on legal notice. The notice requests confirmation that certain obligations regarding vaccine safety have been or will be fulfilled.

Why the HHS? Due the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (the 1986 Act), the HHS shoulders virtually all responsibility for assuring the safety of vaccines being administered to America’s 78 million children. The 1986 Act allows Congress to step in if any act or duty ensuring vaccine safety is abandoned or failed. As it stands, such a burden falls upon the shoulders of the Acting Secretary of the HHS, Eric D. Hargan, and his agency.

After decades of its government passing the buck, avoiding reality, and ignoring the science, America has had enough. An awakening is hitting breakaway speeds as communities are rejecting coercive vaccination practices. Parents have leveraged and dominated social media platforms to sound the alarm about long-failed policies. Meanwhile, a submissive American medical community has forgotten its ethic of informed consent and lost sight of its original oath to do no harm.

The notice was served recently by a non-profit organization Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) founded by Del Bigtree. What is ICAN asking? There are 11 specific questions and points in the notice that previous HHS and CDC leadership should have addressed. But here we are, in 2017, having to serve our government oversight body a legal notice to ensure they do their stated duties.

ICAN’s questions and points are as follows:

Please explain how HHS justifies licensing any pediatric vaccine without first conducting a long-term clinical trial in which the rate of adverse reactions is compared between the subject group and a control group receiving an inert placebo?

Please list and provide the safety data relied upon when recommending babies receive the Hepatitis B vaccine on the first day of life?

Please explain why HHS failed to cooperate with Harvard to automate VAERS reporting? And detail any steps that HHS has taken since toward automating VAERS reporting?

Please explain any specific steps taken by HHS to improve adverse reaction reporting to VAERS?

For each of the 38 vaccine-injury pairs reviewed in the 1994 IOM Report which the IOM found lacked studies to determine causation, please identify the studies undertaken by the HHS to determine whether each injury is caused by vaccination?

For each of the 135 vaccine-injury pairs reviewed in the 2011 IOM Report which the IOM found lacked studies to determine causation, please identify the studies undertaken by the HHS to determine whether each injury is caused by vaccination?

Please explain what HHS has done to assure that health care providers record the manufacturer and lot number for each vaccine they administer?

Please advise when HHS intends to begin conducting research to identify which children are susceptible to serious vaccine injury? If HHS believes it has commenced this research, please detail its activities regarding same?

Please confirm that HHS shall forthwith remove the claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” from the CDC website, or alternatively, please identify the specific studies on which HHS bases its blanket claim that no vaccines cause autism?

Please advise whether HHS intends to forthwith conduct adequately powered and controlled prospective as well as retrospective studies comparing total health outcomes of fully/partially vaccinated children with completely unvaccinated children?

Regarding conflicts of interest and possible steps to reduce them, ICAN’s legal notice asks if HHS will:

A. prohibit conflict waivers for members of HHS’s vaccine committees (ACIP, VRBPAC, NVAC & ACCV)?
B. prohibit HHS vaccine committee members or HHS employees with duties involving vaccines from accepting any compensation from a vaccine maker for five years?
C. require that vaccine safety advocates comprise half of HHS’s vaccine committees?
D. allocate toward vaccine safety an amount at least equal to 50{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} of HHS’s budget for promoting/purchasing vaccines?
E. support the creation of a vaccine safety department independent of HHS?
F. support the repeal of the 1986 Act to the extent it grants immunity to pharmaceutical companies for injuries caused by their vaccine products?

The US regulatory failure and avoidance of responsibility from official organs of the government has reached a crescendo of legendary proportions. People at all levels of American society have provided sustained and ample opportunity for the right moves to take place by the HHS to correct massive failures inherent within the vaccine industry and its regulatory oversight. The People have been patient even as their loved ones around them have generationally shouldered the burdens of physical injury from vaccine products with known, long-standing risks. America has collectively stood by and waited with stoic patience for politicians to act as both its brain trust and wealth has been extracted for little more than pharmaceutical industry profit. In the absence of self-correcting regulatory agencies and in the face of inept political action, the American people have activated through a true grassroots movement birthed from loss and suffering at the hands of vaccine injury.

Read More @ Infowars.com

HELPING ALONG THAT VACCINE… ELECTRONICALLY

by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star:

If you’re like me you probably suspect there’s a whole lot more going on with the push to get everyone vaccinated against…well, just about everything. They still haven’t come up with a vaccine for autism, but if the data is to be objectively believed, they’ve certainly been working on it. THey’ve at least figured out how to induce it.

And if you’re like me, you have probably suspected that there’s some strange connection between this vaccine agenda and all the spraying. Victims of the “non-existent” but very real phenomenon of Morgellon’s know this all to well, as some research conducted By Dr. Hildegard Stavenger and others suggests that the Morgellons’ lesions are full of particulate and very non-organic material that is nonetheless “growing” inside the victims’ bodies. And that suggests to some people. some sort of strange connection with the chemtrail phenomenon. Then there’s the GMO-vaccine phenomenon which I’ve blogged about: why not simply put the crud you want to put into people into their food supply, and “vaccinate” them without their consent.  It wouldn’t be the first time the goobernment or corporations have resorted to foul play to experiment on humans.

In short, what we might be looking at, as some have argued, is a pattern of seemingly discrete phenomena that are being increasingly linked together.

Well, in that vein, consider this article that was spotted and shared by Ms. J.D.F.:

First human trial of DNA-based Zika vaccine shows promise

There’s much here that disturbs, but let’s start with this:

GLS-5700 contains synthetic DNA, which mounts an immune response against specific Zika virus antigens. Pablo Tebas, MD, the lead study author and a researcher at Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, said the results of the trial are promising.

“We saw neutralizing antibodies mount in participants after 14 weeks,” Tebas said in an interview. “And with DNA-based vaccines, it only took 7 months to develop and manufacture this vaccine for the trial. So we could have a Zika vaccine very quickly with this method.”

Yes, you read that correctly, the vaccine contains “synthetic” DNA designed to target the Zika virus specifically. And here we’re chin to chin with the whole GMO issue, in a different guise: What are  the long term inter-generational effects – if any – to the steady ingestion of synthetic DNA? We don’t know; such studies simply have not been done, particularly in this instance. We’re simply “assured” that it’s safe.

But then comes what – for me – is a whopper doozie of a statement and admission. Indeed, it is this statement that caused Ms. J.D.F. to pass along the article:

To conduct the study, Tebas and colleagues recruited 40 adults in the summer of 2016 to receive either 1- or 2-milligram (mg) doses of the vaccine intradermally at 0, 4, and 12 weeks. Accompanying each shot was treatment with Cellectra, a device that uses pulsed electric fields to introduce the DNA sequence into cells. (Emphasis added)

So electrical pulses are being used to assist the vaccine to introduce the synthetic DNA into human cells to produce the antigens and Zika immune-response. So here’s the high octane speculation: This means it might be possible to stimulate other specific immuno-responses – or perhaps even a lack thereof – by a combination of genetic alteration technologies, “vaccines”, and “electrical pulses.” One might even speculate further and suggest that a particular device need not be locally present to generate the necessary “electrical pulses” to create the phenomenon. Crawling out a little farther onto the twig of high octane speculation, it might be possible to use such combined technologies to alter the genome itself.

Read More @ GizaDeathStar.com

A Michigan Woman Is Sent To Prison For Refusing To Vaccinate Her Son

by Michael Snyder, End Of The American Dream:

Should parents that don’t vaccinate their children be locked away in prison?  That is a very chilling question, because there are literally millions of parents all across the country that don’t vaccinate their children for various reasons.  Personally, I have been writing about vaccine safety concerns for the last seven years, and as a member of Congress I will fight extremely hard to make sure that parents always have the right to make health decisions for their own children.  Over the years I have read so many vaccine horror stories from distraught parents, and nobody should ever be forced to vaccinate their children against their will.  Unfortunately, that is something that just happened in Michigan

Rebecca Bredow, of the Detroit area, has has been sentenced to seven days in jail for refusing to bring her child’s vaccinations up to date.

Bredow appeared at a hearing on Wednesday morning at the Oakland County Circuit Court where Judge Karen McDonald sentenced her for contempt of court after Bredow refused to comply with court orders for her to allow her son to receive all his missing vaccinations within one week.

Michigan does have a law that allows parents to opt-out of vaccinations, but in this particular case a custody dispute was involved.  The court had sided with the father and was insisting that the boy’s vaccinations be brought up to date, and the mother was greatly troubled that so many shots would have to be administered all at once

The court order stems from an earlier custody hearing where the boy’s father said he wanted the vaccinations for the child. Breedow told WWJ that she objected to grouping the shots together. [Get more details about the case].

This is just another example of the medical tyranny that we have been witnessing all over the country.  Just today, I came across another article about an 8-year-old boy that was “carted off in a police car to a hospital and being forcibly injected with drugs” on his first day of school this year.  If we don’t stand up and fight, these types of incidents will continue to become even more frequent.

The root of the problem is the major pharmaceutical companies.  We are the most drugged up society in the history of the planet, and they are making billions upon billions of dollars off of our pain and suffering.

And the mainstream media carefully avoids talking about the nightmarish effects of many of these drugs, because the drug companies spend enormous amounts of money on advertising.  For years, the alternative media has been documenting the connection between antidepressants and mass shootings, and I just published an article asking if Stephen Paddock had been on any of those types of drugs.

Well, it turns out that he was

Stephen Paddock, who killed at least 58 people and wounded hundreds more in Las Vegas on Sunday with high-powered rifles, was prescribed an anti-anxiety drug in June that can lead to aggressive behavior, the Las Vegas Review-Journal has learned.

Records from the Nevada Prescription Monitoring Program obtained Tuesday show Paddock was prescribed 50 10-milligram diazepam tablets by Henderson physician Dr. Steven Winkler on June 21.

The more common name for that drug is Valium, and studies have discovered that it can “trigger aggressive behavior”

Diazepam is a sedative-hypnotic drug in the class of drugs known as benzodiazepines, which studies have shown can trigger aggressive behavior. Chronic use or abuse of sedatives such as diazepam can also trigger psychotic experiences, according to drugabuse.com.

But you won’t hear a peep about this from the mainstream media because they might start to lose advertising revenue.

Sadly, the truth is that almost every mass killer over the past several decades was on some sort of pharmaceutical drug at the time of the attack.  The following comes from Paul Joseph Watson

As we previously highlighted, virtually every major mass shooter was taking some form of SSRI or other pharmaceutical drug at the time of their attack, including Columbine killer Eric Harris, ‘Batman’ shooter James Holmes and Sandy Hook gunman Adam Lanza.

As the website SSRI Stories profusely documents, there are literally hundreds of examples of mass shootings, murders and other violent episodes that have been committed by individuals on psychiatric drugs over the past three decades.

And for much more on this, please see this list compiled by WND.

Read More @ EndOfTheAmericanDream.com

It Begins: Detroit Mother Sentenced to Jail for Not Vaccinating Her Son

by Matt Agorist, The Free Thought Project:

Detroit, MI — In a seemingly unprecedented violation of rights, a case out of Detroit, Michigan should worry even the most stringent pro-vaccine advocates. A mother has been sentenced to jail for failing to have her 9-year-old son vaccinated.

While the Free Thought Project has reported on instances of children being denied public services, like school, for not vaccinating their children, the idea that someone is now being thrown in jail for choosing to abstain from vaccination is chilling.

“I would rather sit behind bars standing up for what I believe in, than giving in to something I strongly don’t believe in,” said Rebecca Bredow last week when given the ultimatum—vaccinate your son or go to jail.

On Wednesday, she stood by those words and refused to back down. Judge Karen McDonald then told her she was in violation of the court order to vaccinate her son and she was sentenced to jail.

For refusing to go against her beliefs and vaccinate her son, Bredow will spend the next seven days in a cage.

As the Free Thought Project previously reported, Bredow did not fully abstain from all vaccinations. She is merely choosing to space them out, like lots of parents do.

As WXYZ reports, Rebecca believes in parents having the choice to make the right decision for their children based on the parent’s knowledge of vaccines and the child.

Rebecca told 7 Action News that she and dad made the decision to space out and delay some of their little one’s vaccines.

“It wasn’t until they started grouping them together that I backed off of doing vaccines,” she says.

However, the father, who does not have custody of the children, changed his mind and now wants to vaccinate his children to the fullest extent. Bredow disagrees, but the court has shown that they couldn’t care less about what she thinks—despite Michigan law allowing for vaccine exemption.

Bredow says the court never cared to hear her side of the story, and despite her having custody of the children, the court automatically sided with the father who wants their son vaccinated.

While vaccinating your children is certainly the decision of both parents — the idea of one parent being kidnapped and thrown in a cage for not wanting to vaccinate is the very fabric of tyranny.

“Why automatically side with the father that wants the vaccines? What about my choice as a mother?” says Bredow — and she has a point.

Judge McDonald noted that the boy has two parents and “Dad gets a say.” However, if the roles were reversed, would the father be in a cage right now?

If the court sided with Bredow instead of the father, would the father now be in jail if he vaccinated their child?

Not likely.

“I feel angry. I feel backed into a corner. I feel like my rights as a parent have been taken away,” she said and now she is feeling the wrath of the state.

While there will likely be some folks cheering on the state in this situation, how you feel personally about vaccines should never lead to a loss of freedom. No person should be forced by government regulation or societal pressure to receive any medication or treatment, including vaccines, against his or her will.

Read More @ TheFreeThoughtProject.com