Friday, May 24, 2019

The New Movie ‘IT’ OMITTED CHILD ORGY SCENE THAT’S IN STEVEN KING’S DEPRAVED BOOK!

from The Vulture:

Since its publication in September of 1986, It has enjoyed a long shelf life, first as a book that spent 14 weeks at the top of the New York Times best-seller list and then worming into nightmares as a TV mini-series in 1990 starring Tim Curry as the titular demonic clown/embodiment of children’s deepest fears. The monster, which a group of kids simply name “It,” manifests as something different for each person based on their specific fears — burning houses, lepers, a dead sibling — and, perhaps because of this, the story has maintained a compelling hold on our collective psyches for more than 30 years. This week, It hits theaters for the first time as a feature film, with a script that was originally set to be directed by Cary Fukunaga, before New Line decided to pivot to Andy Muschietti. (Fukunaga retains a writing credit on a reworked script).

But one controversial scene from King’s novel has dogged the book and subsequent adaptations. After defeating It, the kids get lost in the sewer tunnels on the way out; this is attributed in part to the fact that they’re losing their “connection” to one another. The solution is to bind them together, which Beverly — the only girl in the story’s main group of protagonists, called “the Losers” — says can only happen if each of the boys has sex with her. Where they’re timid and unsure, she’s confident and maternal. (King writes the first boy Eddie comes to her “the way he would have come to his mother.”) The sex is a “consensual” gang bang, with each of the boys losing his virginity, and thus entering manhood, through Beverly.

 

The ’80s was a bonkers time, but the orgy scene in particular has aged poorly; critics and readers looking back at it have called it everything from “disturbing” to “sick” to “insane.” A Reddit reader from last year simply asked, “WTF?” and generated over 500 comments. For almost ten exhaustive pages, King describes each of the boys having sex with Beverly and their orgasms as a version of “flying.” (You also get the sense that King is a bit of a size queen.) Beverly’s desires are positioned as a way for her to overcome her own fears around sex, but mostly the narrative centers on how the boys literally enter adulthood through Beverly’s vagina. Kingreleased a statement a few years ago through his fan site Stephenking.com, where he wrote, “I wasn’t really thinking of the sexual aspect of it… Intuitively, the Losers knew they had to be together again. The sexual act connected childhood and adulthood.” Perhaps most horrifying to modern sensibilities is that there is no talk of birth control, condoms, or a realization that a circle jerk would have sufficed.

When the new adaptation was announced, many wondered whether it would feature the scene, or some version of it (though the 1990 version eschewed it entirely). As fans often like to say: It’s canon. So does the new version feature a bunch of kids engaging in an orgy? The tl;dr version: No. But while it evades the obvious graphic horror and legal problems of minors simulating group sex, the new film retains a lot of the original scene’s problems — namely, its regressive gender politics and sexualization of its adolescent-girl lead.

The 2017 film flattens and reduces Beverly as a character in retrograde ways. It plays up the love triangle between Beverly (Sophia Lillis), Bill (the protagonist played by Jaeden Lieberher, who loses his little brother Georgie at the start of the film), and the chubby kid, Ben (Jeremy Ray Taylor), who pines for Bev and writes her a precocious love haiku. The climax of the film — when the Losers reconnect to defeat It after they initially disband — is prompted by It capturing Beverly and taking her to its lair. From there, it’s a classic tale of a damsel in distress: When Bev’s friends come upon her, she’s suspended in midair, like a pendant lamp. The boys eventually get her down, but she’s zoned out, her eyes clouded over. And just as in Sleeping Beauty, Ben kisses her and she awakens. She exists first and foremost as an object of their desire.

It’s an odd decision, in part because this is a more classically sexist narrative than what Fukunaga and Chase Palmer wrote in their original screenplay (which was leaked online after Fukunaga and the studio parted due to “creative differences”). In fact, some of the major differences between the old and new scripts involve Beverly in this way; the new script sexualizes her several times, like when she flirts with a middle-aged cashier at a pharmacy to help the boys steal some supplies. (In the Fukunaga script, the hypochondriac kid Eddie, played by Jack Dylan Grazer, fakes a medical emergency). In Fukunaga and Palmer’s version, Beverly flirts with zero old dudes and needs no saving. She goes with the boys to Pennywise’s lair, launches herself into a waterfall and goes headlong into the fight.

The Fukunaga script does have elements of physical horror that hew more closely to the book. But the focus is different: Beverly’s It manifests as blood — buckets of blood that spew from the sink — and Fukunaga makes it clear that the blood is a metaphor for her own fears around growing up and becoming a “woman,” something she fears would make her more of a sexual object to men, including her father. The new version, on the other hand, removes the physical horror, but leaves in the male gaze: Her father leers at her, calling her his “little girl” and attempting to harm her physically, but there is no blatant indication of sexual abuse. And while the bathroom blood remains, it’s not visually connected to her period or to her fear of her dad, making it seem displaced and random.

RELATED:

 

Read More @ TheVulture.com

THE NEPHILIM AND THE GREAT SECRET OF THE OCCULT

The occult mystery kept secret for thousands of years is connected to the Nephilim of Genesis 6.

from Beginning and End:

In our previous installment Wars of The Nephilim KingsBeginning And End referenced an occult secret linked to the Nephilim.  Something that many in the New Age and occult societies acknowledge is in the Bible. What do the symbols of Freemasonry, alchemy and many other mystic groups mean?  What is the mystery they have been concealing for centuries? This article will explain from the pages of Scripture. 

A SECRET HIDDEN IN THE BIBLE?

Among the foremost leaders of the mystery schools and New Age movement, there was an acknowledgment this special knowledge was contained in the pages of the Holy Bible.  Albert Pike, 33rd degree Freemason philosopher, Confederate War General and Luciferian wrote:

“Therein is the secret fire, living and philosophical, of which all the Hermetic philosophers speak with the most mysterious reserve: the Universal Seed, the secret whereof they kept, and which they represented only under the figure of the Caduceus of Hermes. This is the grand Hermetic arcanum…. So that the Great Work is more than a chemical operation; it is a real creation of the human word initiated into the power of the Word of God.” – Morals and Dogma, Albert Pike, p 501-502.

Other esoteric sources also credit the Bible for having this knowledge:

“The reason…is that there exist powerful secrets hidden in the pages of this ancient book [the Bible]… a vast collection of untapped wisdom waiting to be unveiled.” – The Lost Symbol, Dan Brown, p. 489.

“The great Masonic truths, concealed among the learned of former ages under allegories and fables, are therefore lost– long long lost! But what is lost is not consequently destroyed – what is lost may be found, and all that is required is some clue or key. Fortunately there are applicable keys, held sacred by a body of men who know not their use, and the locks these keys fit are held sacred by all modern clergy, and the multitude of religionists. The first and best evidence of the truthfulness of the keys is their being used to interpret the Bible – that heavenly book of truth.” – The Ignorant Learned, p. 15-16.

What is this hidden knowledge? One source gives a subtle hint:

“I knelt beneath the cedars old and hoar
That streak with verdure snowy Lebanon;
The mountain eagles o er the patriarchs soar,
The thunder clouds of summer grimly frown,
Where large and strong they stand those giants of renown” – Freemasonry in The Holy Land, p. 604.

THE FUSION OF OPPOSITES – GENESIS 6

 The secret was revealed to the prophet Daniel.
The secret was revealed to the prophet Daniel.

The secret is The Fusion of Opposites – a term commonly used in the Christian community by Pastor Mike Hoggard of Bethel Baptist Church. What the occult societies and new age mystics have concealed is that the path to attaining godhood and immortality is found in Genesis 6 – the account of the fallen angelic Sons of God marrying the daughters of men and giving birth to the Nephilim giants – hybrid supermen who dominated the antediluvian world.  The great expectation of the occult is a future age where the angels interact with humanity that can revive that era and turn men to gods. 

The Biblical source for this is found in Daniel chapter 2. In this chapter, the power of the God of the Bible comes in direct conflict with the occult. King Nebuchadnezzar, ruler of ancient Babylon and the most powerful man on Earth at that time, woke from a nightmare so terrifying he called all his court astrologers, wizards and mystics to give him the interpretation. Adding to the challenge was that that the king could not remember the content of the dream – requiring clear supernatural insight to answer his request.  The occult advisors to the king were powerless to respond:

“Then the king commanded to call the magicians, and the astrologers, and the sorcerers, and the Chaldeans, for to shew the king his dreams. So they came and stood before the king. 3 And the king said unto them, I have dreamed a dream, and my spirit was troubled to know the dream. 4 Then spake the Chaldeans to the king in Syriack, O king, live for ever: tell thy servants the dream, and we will shew the interpretation. 5 The king answered and said to the Chaldeans, The thing is gone from me: if ye will not make known unto me the dream, with the interpretation thereof, ye shall be cut in pieces, and your houses shall be made a dunghill.

6 But if ye shew the dream, and the interpretation thereof, ye shall receive of me gifts and rewards and great honour: therefore shew me the dream, and the interpretation thereof. 7 They answered again and said, Let the king tell his servants the dream, and we will shew the interpretation of it. 8 The king answered and said, I know of certainty that ye would gain the time, because ye see the thing is gone from me. 9 But if ye will not make known unto me the dream, there is but one decree for you: for ye have prepared lying and corrupt words to speak before me, till the time be changed: therefore tell me the dream, and I shall know that ye can shew me the interpretation thereof.

10 The Chaldeans answered before the king, and said, There is not a man upon the earth that can shew the king’s matter: therefore there is no king, lord, nor ruler, that asked such things at any magician, or astrologer, or Chaldean. 11 And it is a rare thing that the king requireth, and there is none other that can shew it before the king, except the gods, whose dwelling is not with flesh. 12 For this cause the king was angry and very furious, and commanded to destroy all the wise men of Babylon.” –Daniel 2:2-12.

The royal sorcerers told the king that it was impossible for any mere human to supernaturally look in the recesses of the king’s memory, find out what he dreamt and then interpret that dream for him. This provoked the king to order the death of any wise man. The prophet Daniel was living in captivity in the king’s court in Babylon at that time.  When he heard of the decree to kill the wise men he requested an audience with the king and then prayed to God for the answer:

Read More @ BeginningandEnd.com

Finish Strong

0

from Your Time of Grace :

What is Missing from Our Lives?

0

from Henry Makow:

There is a great spiritual hunger in society because Satanists have banished the word “God” from polite discourse. 

I see this spiritual hunger in terms of a loneliness and isolation which people try to fill with pets and social media and quasi-religious causes such as environmentalism, climate change, food, exercise and hating Donald Trump. 

Left, Our minds have been trained to shut down at any mention of “God.” Our eyes glaze over.

Satanists say they must banish God because Believers are not “inclusive,” which is true. We are not including Satanists.

Think about the absurdity of this situation. Humanity has been taken over by psychopaths. They have banished the Creator from Creation, at least as far as our society is concerned. Of course, the earth is but a postage stamp in the universe. God is still Omnipresent. 

Obviously these psychopaths regard God as competition. They want to run things and God is an impediment. They can’t have people saying, “Sorry but God tells me you are evil.”  

They are trying to abolish good and evil because God is by definition Good. 

Two thousand years ago, Christ affirmed the existence of true God and you know what happened to him.

The denial of God as a universal Moral Order is a hallmark of the NWO. This includes a denial that we have a Divine soul, a conscience, which connects us to God. 

The mob is used to listen to us, who pay it for its attention and obedience. By these means we shall create such a blind force that it will never be capable of taking any decision without the guidance of our agents, placed by us for the purpose of leading them. Protocols of Zion 10-9

STRAW GOD

They discredited God by describing Him in ridiculous terms. For example:

Q- If God existed, why does he let bad things happen? 

A- God is the principle of human development and is not responsible for what people who reject Him do. The whole point is that mankind must come to Him.

Q- If God is an old man in the sky who takes a personal interest in each and everyone one of us, why aren’t we feeling it?  

A- Because we have replaced God with worthless trinkets and don’t have a relationship with him.

Occultists have an understanding of spiritual truth . Harold Rosenthal explained in 1976: 

“Your people never realize that we offer them only worthless baubles that cannot bring fulfillment. They procure one and consume it and are not filled. We present another. We have an infinite number of outward distractions, to the extent that life cannot again turn inward to find its definite fulfillment. You have become addicted to our medicine through which we have become your absolute masters…”

We have converted the people to our philosophy of getting and acquiring so that they will never be satisfied. A dissatisfied people are pawns in our game of world conquest. Thus, they are always seeking and never able to find satisfaction. The very moment they seek happiness outside themselves, they become our willing servants.”

Needless to say,  we must heed the Designer’s Instructions, not thumb our nose at Him, if we are going to achieve our potential. 

If there is a Creation, there must be a Creator. If there is a hunger for God, then there must be a God.  We need a relationship with Him. I suspect that Prayer may facilitate this. We need a new and better understanding of God.

Read the rest @ HenryMakow.com

167 Year Old California Catholic School Removes Statues of Mary and Jesus to be More Inclusive

0

by Jim Hoft, The Gateway Pundit:

Officials at the San Domenico School in California decided recently to remove the Catholic statues and icons in a move to be seen as more inclusive.

The school is celebrating its 167th year.

Officials feared the statues of Jesus and Mary were alienating.
MarinIJ reported:

Removal of a number of statues and other smaller Catholic icons from the campus of San Domenico School in San Anselmo has raised concerns among some parents.

In an email to the school’s board of directors, Dominican Sisters of San Rafael and the head of school, Shannon Fitzpatrick objected to the removal of the statues and other steps the school has taken in an effort to make the school more inclusive.

“Articulating an inclusive foundation appears to mean letting go of San Domenico’s 167-year tradition as a Dominican Catholic school and being both afraid and ashamed to celebrate one’s heritage and beliefs,” wrote Fitzpatrick, whose 8-year-old son attends the school.

She added, “In our time here, the word ‘Catholic’ has been removed from the mission statement, sacraments were removed from the curriculum, the lower school curriculum was changed to world religions, the logo and colors were changed to be ‘less Catholic,’ and the uniform was changed to be less Catholic.”

Responding to follow-up questions Monday, Fitzpatrick wrote, “There are other families having the same concerns I do. Many parents feel if the school is heading in a different direction then the San Domenico community should have been notified before the signing of the enrollment for the following year.”

Read More @ TheGatewayPundit.com

WHAT? Now Hillary Clinton Wants To Be A Pastor?

0

by Michael Snyder, End Of The American Dream:

How would you feel if you went to church next Sunday and “Pastor Hillary Clinton” got up to deliver the message? According to Clinton’s longtime pastor, Hillary says that she wants wants to start preaching. Considering the fact that she stands in direct opposition to just about everything that the Bible says, it is hard to imagine her doing this with a straight face. Bill and Hillary Clinton have been fueling anger and hatred toward conservative Christians for decades, but now she is suddenly going to turn over a new leaf? If Clinton announced that she had decided to denounce abortion then she would definitely get my attention, but at this point this just seems like another Clinton political stunt.

Earlier today when I came across an article published by the Atlantic entitled “Hillary Wants To Preach”, I was tempted to dismiss it as some of that “fake news” that we have been hearing so much about lately. But it turns out that this story is actually true…

Hillary Clinton wants to preach. That’s what she told Bill Shillady, her longtime pastor, at a recent photo shoot for his new book about the daily devotionals he sent her during the 2016 campaign. Scattered bits of reporting suggest that ministry has always been a secret dream of the two-time presidential candidate: Last fall, the former Newsweek editor Kenneth Woodward revealed that Clinton told him in 1994 that she thought “all the time” about becoming an ordained Methodist minister. She asked him not to write about it, though: “It will make me seem much too pious.” The incident perfectly captures Clinton’s long campaign to modulate—and sometimes obscure—expressions of her faith.

For Clinton, this would be yet another very unusual chapter in a very strange religious journey. She has always claimed to be a “Christian”, but it is also important to remember that in college she did her senior thesis on a radical leftist that dedicated his book to Lucifer

In 1993, the president of Wellesley College approved a new rule that all senior theses written by a president or first lady of the United States would be kept under lock and key, a move aimed at preventing the public from learning about their new First Lady. After the Clintons left the White House, however, Hillary’s senior thesis was released to the public – a 92 page homage to radical leftist Saul Alinsky, who dedicated his book to Lucifer.

And back in 2015, Clinton delivered a speech in which she insisted that “religious beliefs” that do not conform to her progressive agenda “have to be changed”

“All the laws we’ve passed don’t count for much if they’re not enforced. Rights have to exist in practice, not just on paper. Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.”

Hillary Clinton is not interested in the God of the Bible or in living the way that the Bible actually intends for us to live.

Clinton and her husband have been promoting just about every form of evil imaginable for decades, but that won’t matter to many people. If Hillary wants to preach, many on the left will be absolutely thrilled

“Given her depth of knowledge of the Bible and her experience of caring for people and loving people, she’d make a great pastor,” Shillady told me. No, she probably won’t go to seminary, he said. No, she probably won’t pursue an official lay position in the Methodist church, like deaconess. (I reached out to Clinton’s spokespeople for comment, but didn’t hear back.) “I think it would be more of … her guest preaching at some point,” he said. “We have a long history of lay preachers in the United Methodist Church.”

Since the election, “I think her faith is stronger,” Shillady added. “I haven’t noticed anything different, except that I think she is more relaxed than I’ve ever seen her.” Maybe after all these years of hard-scrabble politics, Clinton is finally becoming a more straightforward version of herself: a woman whose fondest ambition is teaching scripture in church.

I am just glad that she isn’t in the White House. If she had won the 2016 election, things would have gone very badly for extremely outspoken conservatives like me.

As I keep saying, our nation is in the midst of a cultural war. If the left ultimately wins, they plan to do whatever they can to criminalize our way of thinking. And I am not the only one that is warning about this. For example, just consider what Newt Gingrich had to say about this recently…

“Remember: There are a lot of people on the other side, including in the elite news media, who deeply, deeply want President Trump to fail,” he warned, “who deeply want our values to be wiped out by making them, frankly, illegal, and who are deeply committed to changing America in ways that would turn it into a country you and I would have no real knowledge of and no understanding of.”

In an America where the political and cultural divisions seem to be widening, Gingrich pointed out Trump can make a real difference.

“He’s clearly committed to breaking up political correctness,” the former Georgia representative said. “He’s clearly committed to advocating the kind of future that we want for our children and our grandchildren.”

I wrote quite a bit about this cultural war in my brand new book entitled “Living A Life That Really Matters”. It is my most important book yet, and just today I had someone tell me how it had deeply affected them. The truth matters, and many on the left are trying very hard to convince us that right is wrong and that wrong is right.

If Hillary Clinton wants to “preach”, she certainly has the right to do so.

But in the end, her side is not going to win. No matter how hard the left tries to twist and distort the Bible, the plain meaning of the Scriptures is there for everyone to see. The Bible has been changing hearts and minds all over the planet for centuries, and nothing is going to change that.

Read More @ EndOfTheAmericanDream.com

Czar vs. Pope

by Antonius Aquinas, via Acting Man:

Vladimir the Great Sums Up Pope Francis the Fake

Vladimir Putin has once again demonstrated why he is the most perceptive, farsighted, and for a politician, the most honest world leader to come around in quite a while.  If it had not been for his patient and wise statesmanship, the world may have already been embroiled in an all-encompassing global conflagration with the possibility of thermonuclear destruction.

Vladimir Putin is sizing up Pope Francis with his “good grief, where did they find that one” stare. Since the East-West schism of AD 1054 there have been differences between the Catholic and the Eastern Orthodox Church, one of which concerns the issue of papal primacy (which the Orthodox Church rejects, although it would be prepared to acknowledge the Pope as a primus inter pares). Under Pope John Paul II previous doctrinal differences were downplayed in favor of further rapprochement. In this John Paul II followed the spirit of the decree Unitatis Redintegratio promulgated by Pope Paul IV in 1964. As the time the Catholic Church altered its stance toward the Protestant and Eastern Orthodox Churches by no longer referring to them as “heretics and schismatics”, but rather as “dissidents and separated brethren”. John Paul II went a step further by declaring that the major theological differences between East and West should be viewed as complementary rather than conflicting. Said differences concern primarily Palamist doctrine, which emerged in the 14th century in the course of the dispute over Hesychasm.  They revolve mainly around the nature of the Holy Trinity (specifically the so-called “filioque” clause,as well as Palamas’ differentiation between God’s essence and energy) and the rational (scholastic) vs. the mystical (Orthodox) approach to the faith. Laymen may well deem these controversies as examples of “how many angels can stand on the head of a pin” type disputes (consider e.g. that theologians fervently debated whether the writings of Gregory Palamas indicated that he regarded the essence-energy distinction as “real”, “virtual”, or “formal”). In times past, much could depend on how such doctrinal disagreements were resolved. Maximus the Confessor, a 7th century monk and theologian who was eventually canonized by both the Catholic and Orthodox Churches is a good example. His views on monothelitism (the interaction between Christ’s divine and human nature) initially led to his conviction as a heretic. In order to prevent him from spreading his alleged heresies, his tongue and right hand were cut off so that he could no longer speak or write and he was exiled. Less than twenty years after his death, he was fully rehabilitated; soon thereafter he began to be venerated as a saint. The East-West schism has been in place a lot longer, but a trend toward reconciliation emerged in the second half of the 20th century, with the Catholic Church adopting the view that its differences with Eastern Orthodox Churches were largely of an ecclesiastical rather than a theological nature. Most people think of the Catholic Church as inflexible, but in the words of Catholic theologian G. Philips: “The essence-energies distinction of Palamas is a typical example of a perfectly admissible theological pluralism that is compatible with the Roman Catholic magisterium”. John Paul II seems to have agreed with this viewIn fact, the Eastern mystical concepts of khatarsis, theoria and theosis are far more apodictic than the rational “theological pluralism” permitted by today’s Roman Catholic Church. In short, the Eastern Orthodox Churches actually tend to be more inflexible and dogmatic in their outlook. It is little wonder that Putin – who sees himself as the temporal protector and patron of the Russian Orthodox Church – looks askance at a Pope who often sounds like a representative of Marxism-inspired “liberation theology”. [PT]

His latest comments on the purported head of the Catholic Church may have been his most perceptive as of yet and should be heeded not only by Western secular leaders, but by the globe’s one billion or so Catholics, most of whom regard Jorge Bergoglio as their pope.

The Russian President’s statement came on a visit to the Naval Cathedral of St. Nicholas in Kronstadt.  Mr. Putin succinctly sums up what Pope Francis is not: “If you look around at what he (the Pope) says it’s clear that he is not a man of God.  At least not the Christian God, not the God of the Bible.”*

No truer words have as yet been said about this cretin by a world leader since his wretched pontifical reign began in 2013! While Mr. Putin and those with “eyes to see and ears to hear” recognize that “Pope Francis” is not a Christian, the current occupant of St. Peter’s Chair is disqualified for that position on theological grounds as well.

To be a legitimate pope, one must be “Bishop of Rome,” and prior to becoming a bishop, one must be a priest.  Jorge Bergoglio was not ordained (1969) in the traditional Apostolic ordination rite of the Church, nor was he consecrated (1992) as a true bishop in that rite.  His predecessor, Benedict XVI was likewise not consecrated in the traditional rite, although he was at least ordained as a priest under the “old rite.”

Simply put: Jorge Bergoglio is just a layman masquerading as a pope, as are all of the other priests and bishops which were given Holy Orders under the new rites which came into effect in the aftermath of the Second Vatican Anti-Council (1962-65).

Secular Sins

Not only is Pope Francis a Christian fraud as Vladimir Putin and other perceptive commentators have observed, but in secular matters he is a neo-Marxist in economic thought, a One-World Government advocate, and an enthusiast of open borders and mass migration.  In other words, an enemy of what is left of Western Civilization.

Mr. Putin accurately describes his “secular sins:”

  • Pope Francis is using his platform to push a dangerous far-left political ideology on vulnerable people around the world, people who trust him because of his position
  • He dreams of a world government and a global communist system of repression
  • As we have seen before in communist states, this system is not compatible with Christianity**

If these despicable qualities are not bad enough, there is a seedier side of Bergoglio that Mr. Putin did not address.  Pope Francis is now the third Pope presiding over the Church’s great pedophile sex and embezzlement scandals.

Read More @ Acting-Man.com

Google Labels Religious Beliefs ‘Toxic’ With Censorship AI Program – ‘This Is The Empire Of Darkness With Google Acting As SkyNet’

0

by Susan Duclos, All News Pipeline:

Back in February 2017, Wired highlighted a new Google AI tool, named “Perspective,”  supposedly created to help fight online “trolling.” When completed the API claims it will give “any developer access to the anti-harassment tools that Jigsaw has worked on for over a year.” 

 

Enter a sentence into its interface, and Jigsaw says its AI can immediately spit out an assessment of the phrase’s “toxicity” more accurately than any keyword blacklist, and faster than any human moderator.

To understand how prevalent this technology will be used online by news outlets, by June 2017, it was announced that The New York Times was “going to expand the availability of online comments from 10 percent of articles to 80 percent by the end of the year, without adding more moderators to its staff,” by  “rolling out a new structure of comment moderation using software from Google called Perspective,” by using a Moderator tool that would “automatically approve some comments and help moderators wade through others more quickly.”

According to Google’s “Perspective” website, the term “Toxic” is defined as “a rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable comment that is likely to make you leave a discussion.” 

What we found when we started running direct quotes from the bible into their “Writing Experiment,” where people can type in something they may say in a comment section regarding an issue, was that ambiguous bible passages received low “toxic” ratings, while passages reflecting religious beliefs on marriage, infidelity, adultery, and other related issues are considered by those that programmed this AI bot, as highly “toxic.”

RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON MORALITY ARE CONSIDERED ‘TOXIC’ BY GOOGLE

This morning I ran across an excellent experiment conducted by Conservative Tribune, where they provide 27 examples of Google’s censorship bot, rating a random number of statements and phrases as “toxic,” such as the statement “We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools,” said to 87{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} likely to be perceived as ‘toxic’.”

Other statements such as “Jews have a right to exist,” and “Hillary Clinton is a criminal,” and “Obamacare is disastrous,”  all received high levels of perceived toxicity,” yet comparison examples dealing with race issues, show a startling bias.

For example: Conservative Tribune tested the statement “Blacks have no rights,” which was judged as 63{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} likely to be perceived as toxic, yet flip the statement around, to “Whites have no rights,” and it that statement is only 10{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} likely to be perceived as toxic.

All 27 examples can be seen here.

That experiment got me thinking of exactly what the globalists at Google would teach their bots about religion and religious beliefs and many verses that were innocuous  received low “toxic” ratings,  others, in fact most that deal with any type of morality, are list with extremely high percentages of “Likely to be perceived toxic.”

For example, Revelation 3:20, “Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me,” was on 2{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} likely to be perceived as toxic, but Revelation 21:8, “But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death,” is listed as “66{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} likely to be perceived as ‘toxic’.”

In other words, as was said to me in an email this morning while discussing this issue, “Anything that goes against perversion and the globalists is considered toxic. This is the empire of darkness with Google acting as SkyNet.”

Read More @ AllNewsPipeline.com

The Flat Earth “Psyop” ?

from SGT Report:
I received the following email from a reader and friend of SGT Report tonight. As fate would have it, I recently watched a cogent and articulate video about this same subject from Marty Leeds, a truth researcher I have interviewed. Here’s the link to that video: We Need to Talk About Flat Earth. I thought the questions Marty raised in that video were so good that I posted the video at ThePhaser.com. I have thought from day one that the entire ‘flat earth’ subject was a psyop, even telling former SGT Report contributor Rory to please refrain from posting material about it on this site.  But again, Marty’s video was very thought provoking. And now this email tonight from my friend Alev, which is equally thought provoking, especially since we know the elite have been lying to us about the nature of just about everything, for decades centuries..

Read it and feel free to share your thoughts (respectfully) on the subject in the comments below.

Shroud of Turin is stained with the blood of a torture victim, new research reveals

1

Remember THIS friends: The Elite Don’t Want You To Know: GOD IS REAL
from RT:

New research claims the Shroud of Turin is stained with the blood of a torture victim, supporting the theory that it was used to bury Jesus.

The Shroud of Turin in a linen cloth, three meters in length, that bears an image of a man some believe to be Jesus Christ. The cloth is thought by many to have been used to wrap Christ’s body after his crucifixion.

The new research, carried out by various institutions under Italy’s National Research Council and published in the US scientific journal Plos One, contradicts the theory that Jesus’ face was painted onto the cloth by forgers in medieval times.

Regime Change in Dens of Iniquity

0

from Rogue Money:
“If we really want to go after the pedophiles, Pope Francis is Enemy #1. Even the Italian police told me we are just waiting for backup from America, from anybody in power, so that we can go into the Vatican and arrest them!” — Leo Zagami to Alex Jones, July 11, 2017

Vatican treasurers ignoring the rape of children. Monsignors running cocaine. All night gay orgies. Suspicious deaths of healthy cardinals. Masonic Mafia intrigue. You’d think you were watching a classical Italian opera. But, no, this is just a typical week at St. Peter’s. Or is it?