Saturday, December 5, 2020

Hannity’s Best Ever Monologue: ‘Hillary Clinton and Her Husband Sold Out America to the Russians!’ (VIDEO)

by Joshue Caplan, The Gateway Pundit:

Fox News host Sean Hannity gave his BEST EVER monologue on the Clinton-Uranium One deal bombshell Tuesday night. In a nearly 14 minute throw down, Hannity blasted the Clintons, demanded Mueller, Rosenstein, and Sessions investigate the scandal and smashed the media for endlessly pushing the unproven Russian interference narrative. 

The opening monologue is comprised of the first 14 minutes in the video above.

Mediaite reports:

“After President Trump won in November, President Obama and his administration — they were telling anyone who would listen, ‘Russia! Russia! Russia! Russia interfered with our election. Russia was creating a direct threat to American democracy’” Hannity mocked. “Well if that’s the case, why when they have mountains of evidence that we will reveal tonight of Russian bribery going back to 2009, why then would the Obama administration and Hillary [Clinton] in particular sign off on the sale of 20{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} of America’s uranium to Vladimir Putin and the Russians?”

The Fox News host boasted about his own coverage of the Uranium One deal by showing a clip of himself from back in July predicting it would be “the biggest news” to come out this year.

“Tonight, with this new evidence, what we have discovered is that the evidence against the Clintons is overwhelming, it is incontrovertible,” Hannity continued. “Hillary Clinton and her husband sold out America to the Russians while millions of dollars flowed to their family foundation. And in the process, Clinton created a massive national security risk for every man, woman, and child — giving Vladimir Putin control over American uranium.”

Hannity broke major news on his program tonight.

Read More @ TheGatewayPundit..com

FBI Informant “Threatened” After Offering Details Linking Clinton Foundation to Russian Bribery Case

0

from Russia Insider:

Meanwhile, the ‘journalists’ over at CNN are still trying to get to the bottom of exactly who spent the $100,000 on Facebook ads…

While the mainstream media has largely ignored it, the scandal surrounding Russian efforts to acquire 20{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} of America’s uranium reserves, a deal which was ultimately approved by the Obama administration, and more specifically the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) which included Hillary Clinton and Eric Holder, is becoming more problematic for Democrats by the hour. 

As The Hill pointed out earlier this morning, the latest development in this sordid tale revolves around a man that the FBI used as an informant back in 2009 and beyond to build a case against a Russian perpetrator who ultimately admitted to bribery, extortion and money laundering.  The informant, who is so far only known as “Confidential Source 1,” says that when he attempted to come forward last year with information that linked the Clinton Foundation directly to the scandal he was promptly silenced by the FBI and the Obama administration.

Working as a confidential witness, the businessman made kickback payments to the Russians with the approval of his FBI handlers and gathered other evidence, the records show.

Sources told The Hill the informant’s work was crucial to the government’s ability to crack a multimillion dollar racketeering scheme by Russian nuclear officials on U.S. soil that involved bribery, kickbacks, money laundering and extortion. In the end, the main Russian executive sent to the U.S. to expand Russian President Vladimir Putin’s nuclear business, an executive of an American trucking firm and a Russian financier from New Jersey pled guilty to various crimes in a case that started in 2009 and ended in late 2015.

Toensing added her client has had contact from multiple congressional committees seeking information about what he witnessed inside the Russian nuclear industry and has been unable to provide that information because of the NDA.

“He can’t disclose anything that he came upon in the course of his work,” she said.

The information the client possesses includes specific allegations that Russian executives made to him about how they facilitated the Obama administration’s 2010 approval of the Uranium One deal and sent millions of dollars in Russian nuclear funds to the U.S. to an entity assisting Bill Clinton’s foundation. At the time, Hillary Clinton was serving as secretary of State on the government panel that approved the deal, the lawyer said.

It has been previously reported that Bill Clinton accepted $500,000 in Russian speaking fees in 2010 and collected millions more in donations for his foundation from parties with a stake in the Uranium One deal, transactions that both the Clintons and the Obama administration denied had any influence on the approval.

In the midst of the new discoveries revealed yesterday about the Uranium One case (see: FBI Uncovered Russian Bribery Plot Before Obama Approved Uranium One Deal, Netting Clintons Millions), “Confidential Source 1” has once again hired an attorney, Victoria Toensing, a former Reagan Justice Department official and former chief counsel of the Senate Intelligence Committee, to get his story out.

 

Sitting down with The Hill earlier, Toensing said that the last time her client tried to speak out “both his reputation and liberty” were “threatened” by the Obama administration in a effort to force his silence. 

“All of the information about this corruption has not come out,” she said in an interview Tuesday. “And so my client, the same part of my client that made him go into the FBI in the first place, says, ‘This is wrong. What should I do about it?’”

Toensing said she also possesses memos that recount how the Justice Department last year threatened her client when he attempted to file a lawsuit that could have drawn attention to the Russian corruption during the 2016 presidential race as well as helped him recover some of the money Russians stole from him through kickbacks during the FBI probe.

The undercover client witnessed “a lot of bribery going on around the U.S.” but was asked by the FBI to sign a nondisclosure agreement (NDA) that prevents him from revealing what he knows to Congress, Toensing explained.

When he tried to bring some of the allegations to light in the lawsuit last year, “the Obama Justice Department threatened him with loss of freedom. They said they would bring a criminal case against him for violating an NDA,” she added.

Emails obtained by The Hill show that a civil attorney working with the former undercover witness described the pressure the Justice Department exerted to keep the client from disclosing to a federal court what he knew last summer.

“The government was taking a very harsh position that threatened both your reputation and liberty,” the civil lawyer wrote in one email. In another, she added, “As you will recall the gov’t made serious threats sufficient to cause you to withdraw your civil complaint.”

As we pointed out last summer when Peter Schweizer first released his feature documentary Clinton Cash, the Uranium One deal at the center of this scandal is believed to have netted the Clintons and their Clinton Foundation millions of dollars in donations and ‘speaking fees’ from Uranium One shareholders and other Russian entities.

Read More @ Russia-Insider.com

What You’re Not Being Told About Trump’s War Against the Iran Nuclear Deal

0

by Darius Shahtahmasebi, The Anti Media:

 Last Friday, Donald Trump made a hard-hitting speech demonizing Iran. This shouldn’t have come as a surprise considering candidate Trump made it quite clear that he despised Iran. Prior to that, he had spent the last few years criticizing Barack Obama for entering into a nuclear agreement with the Iranian government. President Trump has now further intensified his stance, threatening to derail the deal multiple times before announcing his plan to “decertify” Iran’s compliance with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

Donald Trump has vehemently voiced his opposition to the JCPOA over the course of the last few years. “The Iran deal was one of the worst and most one-sided transactions the United States ever entered into,” is just one of Trump’s lamentations. He also called it an “embarrassment” and a “catastrophe,” at one point stating it was “incompetently negotiated.”

For the sake of this contention, let’s accept Trump’s assertion that the JCPOA is one of the “worst” and most “one-sided transactions” the U.S. has ever been a party to. If this is true, the simple solution would be to exit the deal completely.

So why hasn’t he exited the deal? The president has been in office since January, has been bashing Iran the entire time, and has flirted with demolishing the JCPOA numerous times. Yet the U.S. is still a party to this deal (remember, it’s one of the worst deals of all time).

Vox explains:

Accounts from inside the White House suggest that it’s supposed to be a kind of Goldilocks compromise: a move that would prevent Trump from having to regularly certify that the Iran deal is working, which wounds his pride given how publicly he’s criticized it, while simultaneously avoiding the potentially catastrophic consequences of quitting the Iran deal.”

If anything, President Trump is actually still acting well within the scope of the agreement – certainly not outside of it. As Vox explained further:

“Decertification, on its own, does not put the US in violation of this deal, because it doesn’t reimpose sanctions. There’s nothing in the text of the deal itself…that requires the American president to certify that Iran is complying with the deal’s terms.”

Read More @ TheAntiMedia.com

Clinton/Obama Were Colluding With The Russians, Not Trump

by Tim Brown, Freedom Outpost:

While the media, the Democrats and many Republicans have been losing their minds, spending our money and wasting time on investigating something they have no evidence for investigating, namely the Trump administration colluding with the Russians, the real colluders were Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah and Bill and Hillary Clinton.

It isn’t like we haven’t pointed out some of this collusion before here, but C. Mitchell Shaw reports at The New American:

Newly released information confirms that it is Hillary Clinton — as secretary of state — and not Trump who can be shown to be “Putin’s puppet. The Hill, Fox News, Newsweek, and others are reporting that a deal between Clinton’s State Department and Russian interests that transferred 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russian control involved bribery, collusion, and coverup. And Clinton’s fingerprints are all over it.

This confirms reports published by The New American even as the failed Clinton campaign and its accomplices in the liberal mainstream media continued to beat the stillborn horse of Trump/Russia collusion. In an article originally published in our print magazine and later published online, this writer addressed the evidence of “unethical, illegal, and corrupt behavior” revealed in the leaked Clinton campaign and DNC e-mails and documents published by WikiLeaks:

Those e-mails and documents serve as a box full of smoking guns against the DNC and Clinton campaign. A quick look at just a few of those

smoking guns — any of which alone would be damning — illustrates why Clinton (with the help of the liberal media) wanted to keep the attention on the supposed source of the leak, rather than on what the e-mails show about Clinton and her comrades in the DNC….

As secretary of state, Clinton “reset” relations with Putin’s Russia, which helped the Clinton Foundation and its donors make millions of dollars off a deal that sold the mining company Uranium One (and 25 percent of our strategic uranium production) to Russia.

That report by The New American — in February — was published months before The Hill “broke” this story.

Now, more is known about that deal. And the more that comes out, the worse it looks for both Clinton and Obama: FBI and court documents show that the Obama-era FBI (under the “leadership” of ousted FBI Director James Comey) was aware that Putin’s regime in Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, according to a report by The Hill. As an aside, does anyone still think it was a mistake for Trump to fire Comey?

The evidence of bribes and kickbacks is not mere conjecture and innuendo (as in the case of allegations against Trump), but is solidly supported by “a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry” who gathered “extensive financial records,” made “secret recordings,” and intercepted “emails as early as 2009,” according to The Hill. Moreover:

They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.

The racketeering scheme was conducted “with the consent of higher level officials” in Russia who “shared the proceeds” from the kickbacks, one agent declared in an affidavit years later.

And yet — even with the FBI and other federal authorities being aware of this in 2009, the DOJ dragged the investigation out until 2015, allowing a deal to go through that transferred between 20 and 25 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia in the Uranium One deal that fattened the coffers of the Clinton Foundation, strengthened Putin’s Russia, and weakened the United States. For the anti-American element (for whom Clinton was the perfect candidate), that is a win/win/win scenario.

This isn’t all.

In a secret tarmac meeting, Hillary Clinton told the FBI’s Robert Meuller to deliver uranium to the Russians.

In June 2017, we reported:

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton facilitated the transfer a highly enriched uranium (HEU) previously confiscated by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) during a 2006 “nuclear smuggling sting operation involving one Russian national and several Georgian accomplices,” a newly leaked classified cable shows.

So-called “background” information was provided in the cable which gave vague details on a 2006 nuclear smuggling sting operation in which the U.S. government took possession of some HEU previously owned by the Russians.

“Over two years ago Russia requested a ten-gram sample of highly enriched uranium (HEU) seized in early 2006 in Georgia during a nuclear smuggling sting operation involving one Russian national and several Georgian accomplices. The seized HEU was transferred to U.S. custody and is being held at a secure DOE facility.”

The secret “action request,” dated Aug. 17, 2009, was sent out by Secretary of State Clinton and was addressed to the United States Ambassador to Georgia Embassy Tbilisi, the Russian Embassy, and Ambassador John Beyrle.

Read More @ FreedomOutpost.com

Massive criminal conspiracy unravels: Hillary Clinton took $145M from Russians to sell out the U.S. uranium supply to America’s enemies (and the FBI knew all along)

0

by Mike Adams, Natural News:

We have truly reached the point in American history where criminal indictments need to be immediately leveled against James Comey, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Robert Mueller and a dozen other high-ranking officials who are now known to have been complicit in one of the most treasonous criminal cover-ups in American history.

Although the entire left-wing media is running a campaign of complete silence on this story, the rest of the media is now widely reporting that, under President Obama, the FBI had documented an exhaustive trail of corruption, bribery and treason that involved Hillary Clinton, State Department corruption and Russia-linked mining companies that acquired rights to U.S. uranium supplies. This truth was described in great detail in the book Clinton Cash by Peter Schweizer, and now evidence is emerging that further confirms the depth of collusion, corruption, money laundering and treason that Hillary Clinton actively pursued to collect $145 million from Russia-linked sources.

According to The Hill:

Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews.

They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.

Former President Barack Obama oversaw this criminal racketeering scheme, according to multiple sources. “It turns out the Obama administration knew the Russians were engaged in bribery, kickbacks and extortion in order to gain control of US atomic resources — yet still OK’d that 2010 deal to give Moscow control of one-fifth of America’s uranium,” writes the New York Post. “Hillary Clinton, again, sat on a key government body that had to approve the deal — though she now claims she had no role in a deal with profound national security implications, and during the campaign called the payments a coincidence.”

“…[T]he State Department under Clinton and other agencies on the Committee on Foreign Investment approved unanimously the sale of Uranium One, a Canadian mining company, to Russia’s state nuclear company Rosatom, which gave Moscow control over 20 percent of U.S. strategic reserves,” reports NewsTarget.

Robert Mueller ran the FBI as this criminal racket was taking place

What’s even more astonishing about all this is that Robert Mueller, now running a partisan special counsel investigation into the fake conspiracy theory that falsely claims Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election, was the head of the FBI while this Uranium One treason was taking place.

“Until September 2013, the FBI director was Robert Mueller — who’s now the special counsel probing Russian meddling in the 2016 election. It’s hard to see how he can be trusted in that job unless he explains what he knew about this Obama-era cover-up,” writes the NY Post.

“The connections to the current Russia case are many. The Mikerin probe began in 2009 when Robert Mueller, now the special counsel in charge of the Trump case, was still FBI director. And it ended in late 2015 under the direction of then-FBI Director James Comey, whom Trump fired earlier this year,” adds The Hill.

Mueller, who like James Comey appears to be a political lackey for the Clinton crime cartel, is just one of many shadowing players in this rapidly unraveling story of corruption and lies. Bill Clinton, wouldn’t you know it, is also implicated. As The Hill explains:

Peter Schweitzer and The New York Times documented how Bill Clinton collected hundreds of thousands of dollars in Russian speaking fees and his charitable foundation collected millions in donations from parties interested in the deal while Hillary Clinton presided on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.

U.S. Senate investigation launched to uncover the truth about this treason, corruption and collusion

As The Hill writes, this morning the Senate has launched an official probe into this astonishing criminal cartel that was operating right under the nose of Barack Obama:

Read More @ NaturalNews.com

THE US MILITARY’S NEW “CONNECT EVERYTHING TO …

0

by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star:

One activity that is uniquely human is warfare. To be sure, the animal kingdom has its share of fights, but these lack what humanity brings to the table: organization, strategy and tactics, logistics, and always the search for the “technological edge”.  But Mr. H.B. and Ms. K.M found this article, and its sheer audacity make me question whether the US military leadership has taken leave of its senses.  We’ll get back to that in a moment in today’s high octane speculation. First, the article:

The Future the US Military is Constructing: a Giant, Armed Nervous System

The essence of the military’s plan is to “connect everything to everything”:

Leaders of the Air Force, Navy, Army and Marines are converging on a vision of the future military: connecting every asset on the global battlefield.

That means everything from F-35 jets overhead to the destroyers on the sea to the armor of the tanks crawling over the land to the multiplying devices in every troops’ pockets. Every weapon, vehicle, and device connected, sharing data, constantly aware of the presence and state of every other node in a truly global network. The effect: an unimaginably large cephapoloidal nervous system armed with the world’s most sophisticated weaponry.

US Air Force Chief of staff General David Goldfein is referenced in the article, by a recent speech he gave in which he uses Elon Musk’s Tesla cars as an example of such large scale interconnectivity. But this view is orders of magnitude beyond what has been seen thus far:

The idea borrows from the  “network centric warfare” concept that seized the military imagination more than a decade ago. But what leaders are today describing is larger by orders of magnitude. It’s less a strategy for integrating multiple networks into operations more efficiently than a plan to stitch everything, networks within networks, into a single web. The purpose: better coordinated, faster, and more lethal operations in air, land, sea, space, and cyberspace.

The Navy too is on board with this:

Navy leaders, too, are eager to connect every object on the sea, land, air, space and cyberspace. This is no exaggeration. As Adm. John Richardson, Chief of Naval Operations, put it during the Navy’s Future Force Expo in Washington, D.C., in July, “I want to network everything to everything.”

This is necessary to preserve the U.S. Navy’s advantage, even if Richardson gets the larger 355-ship fleet he seeks — hardly a given in today’s industrial and budgetary landscape. Adversaries are building more and better ships and weapons, and even the U.S. superiority in orbital and terrestrial sensing is diminishing. The cost of launching a constellation of spy sats is dropping asthe satellites become smaller and launches become cheaper.

This is curious, since the Navy has recently re-emphasized the need for crews to be less reliant on GPD systems and able to navigate the “old fashioned way”, by celestial navigation, compasses, charts, sextants, and so on. We’ll get back to this point in a moment.

What is intriguing about all this is apparently someone else is doing a bit of high octane speculations about all these developments as well, posing a kind of “Terminator” scenario, where the military – and humanity as a whole – becomes the victim of its own technological fascination:

Certainly, “network everything to everything” sounds a bit like the setup for the Terminator franchise, wherein a fictional defense contractor, Cyberdyne Systems, convinces the Defense Department to link the U.S. arsenal to a single artificially intelligent entity. Skynet, of course, determines that humans are a threat to its existence and uses its ubiquitous command and control powers to launch a war on humankind.

Military leaders hate comparisons between their own tech projects and anything from the Terminator franchise. The reference usually comes up in discussions about individual drones with missiles or “killer robots.” Defense Department watchers are always keen to remind people that official policy is to keep humans at the top of the command-and-control loop, overseeing —or at least retaining veto power — over the decision to take life.

But there’s another danger here, and it’s much more down-to-earth, and I suspect the reader has already seen it: cyber systems are not secure, only look at the history of recent hacking episodes. Everyone has been hacked in recent years it seems, from Sony to the Securities and Exchange Commission to Equifax and Social Security and on and on the list goes. Viruses and malware prowl the internet constantly. I would even go so far as to say that even quantum communications systems will eventually fall tothe human passion to find ways around or through invincible systems. And then there’s the Fitzgerald and McCain incidents, and the two incidents with the USS Donald Cook: while thehigh octane speculative consensus on these incidents appears to be that some kind of jamming occurred, hacking cannot be entirely ruled out.

So now imagine a military universe where everything is connected to everything else: it takes little imagination to see that this could serve to make everything vulnerable.

But the “Terminator” scenario cannot be ruled out either. Consider again the last statement in the above quotation: the military would ensure that humans remain in control “at the top.” I cannot help but think of old field marshal Von Moltke at the very beginning of World War One: then, too, new technological wonders gave commanding generals unique access to the picture of the whole battlefield: the problem was, the reports coming in by telephone, telegraph, and radio were too slow: events moved faster then the ability to report them and for Von Moltke to keep up with them. It might be argued that connecting everything to everything will allow commanders to see the “whole picture” in real time… maybe so, but will they be able to react “fast enough”? Probably not, for the ineluctable logic of reliance on this type of technologies ultimately means that humans are replaced by high frequency reacting algorithms. We’ve already seen it take place in the securities and commodities markets, withthe result that the markets look less and less reflective of real human realities. A similar logic might compel the good intentions of leaving humans in control to abandon those good intentions, in the name of military superiority and national security, of course.

And if the whole system is somehow “taken down” by hacking or other electronic warfare?

Read More @ GizaDeathStar.com

UNSUCCESSFUL RAID ATTEMPT BY THE BANKERS: GOLD DOWN ONLY $3.75 AND SILVER DOWN ONL 2 CENTS

by Harvey Organ, Harvey Organ Blog:

MARK CARNEY REVEALS THAT IT WILL BE THE EU THAT WILL SUFFER ON A HARD BREXIT

GOLD: $1281.20 DOWN $3.75

Silver: $17.00 DOWN 2 cents

Closing access prices:

Gold $1280.50

silver: $17.00

SHANGHAI GOLD FIX:  FIRST FIX  10 15 PM EST  (2:15 SHANGHAI LOCAL TIME)

SECOND FIX:  2:15 AM EST  (6:15 SHANGHAI LOCAL TIME)

SHANGHAI FIRST GOLD FIX: $1296.60 DOLLARS PER OZ

NY PRICE OF GOLD AT EXACT SAME TIME:  $1288.20

PREMIUM FIRST FIX:  $8.42 (premiums getting larger)

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

SECOND SHANGHAI GOLD FIX: $1296;60

NY GOLD PRICE AT THE EXACT SAME TIME: $1288.20

Premium of Shanghai 2nd fix/NY:$8.42(PREMIUMS GETTING LARGER)  

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

LONDON FIRST GOLD FIX:  5:30 am est  $1280.65

NY PRICING AT THE EXACT SAME TIME: $1281.00

LONDON SECOND GOLD FIX  10 AM: $1280.20

NY PRICING AT THE EXACT SAME TIME. 1280.80

For comex gold:

OCTOBER/

NOTICES FILINGS TODAY FOR OCT CONTRACT MONTH: 82 NOTICE(S) FOR  8,200OZ.

TOTAL NOTICES SO FAR: 2436 FOR 243,600 OZ  (7.576TONNES)

For silver:

OCTOBER

 

 48 NOTICES FILED TODAY FOR

 

240,000  OZ/

Total number of notices filed so far this month: 776 for 3,880,000 oz

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Bitcoin:  $5558 bid /$5546 offer DOWN $29.40(MORNING)

BITCOIN CLOSING;$5409.00 BID/$5428.00 DOWN $148.00

end

Let us have a look at the data for today

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In silver, the total open interest SURPRISINGLY FELL BY ONLY 334 contracts from  192,262  UP TO 191,928 WITH RESPECT TO YESTERDAY’S TRADING (DOWN 33 CENTS).  THE CROOKS ARE STILL HAVING AN AWFUL TIME TRYING TO COVER THEIR MASSIVE SILVER SHORTS.  IT IS OBVIOUS THAT WE MUST HAVE HAD MINIMAL BANKER SHORT COVERING AND THUS THE REASON FOR ANOTHER RAID TODAY.

RESULT: A TINY SIZED FALL IN OI COMEXWITH THE  33 CENT PRICE FALL.  OUR BANKERS COULD NOT COVER ANY OF THEIR HUGE SHORTFALL AND THUS ANOTHER CONTINUAL RAID WAS CALLED UPON . 

 In ounces, the OI is still represented by just UNDER 1 BILLION oz i.e.  0.961 BILLION TO BE EXACT or 138{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} of annual global silver production (ex Russia & ex China).

FOR THE NEW FRONT OCT MONTH/ THEY FILED: 48 NOTICE(S) FOR 240,000OZ OF SILVER.

In gold, the open interest FELL BY A FAIR 4334 CONTRACTS DESPITE THE HUGE  FALL IN PRICE OF GOLD ($17.40) .  The new OI for the gold complex rests at 528,800 .OUR BANKER FRIENDS  COVERED ONLY A SMALL AMOUNT OF THEIR GOLD SHORTS SO THEYCOMMENCED ANOTHER  RAID THIS MORNING..

 

Result: A FAIR SIZED DECREASE IN OI WITH THE FALL IN PRICE IN GOLD ($17.40). WE HAD SOME BANKER GOLD SHORT COVERING BY THE BANKERS WHICH WAS NOT ENOUGH FOR OUR CROOKS  SO ANOTHER RAID WAS INITIATED TODAY . 

we had: 82 notice(s) filed upon for 8200 oz of gold.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

With respect to our two criminal funds, the GLD and the SLV:

GLD:   

Tonight , NO CHANGESin gold inventory at the GLD/

Inventory rests tonight: 853.13 tonnes.

SLV

Today:  A HUGE change in inventory: A MONSTROUS WITHDRAWAL OF 3.49 MILLIONOZ

INVENTORY RESTS AT 322.271 MILLION OZ

 

end

.

First, here is an outline of what will be discussed tonight:

1. Today, we had the open interest in silver FELL BY A TINY 334 contracts from 192,262  DOWN TO 191,928(AND now A LITTLE CLOSER TO THE NEW COMEX RECORD SET ON FRIDAY/APRIL 21/2017 AT 234,787) .  OUR BANKERS WERE AGAIN UNSUCCESSFUL IN COVERING THEIR SILVER SHORTS. THE DATA ALSO SUGGESTS THAT THE BANKERS COULD ONLY COVER A SMALL THEIR GOLD SHORTS  . HOWEVER IT IS CLEAR THATSILVERIS BECOMING IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE CROOKS TO COVER.

RESULT:  A TINY SIZED DECREASE IN SILVER OI  AT THE COMEX WITH THE HUGE  FALL IN PRICE OF 33CENTS WITH RESPECT TO YESTERDAY’S TRADING. OUR BANKER FRIENDS WERE UNSUCCESSFUL IN THEIR ATTEMPT TO COVER ANY OF OUR SILVER SHORTS

(report Harvey)

.

2.a) The Shanghai and London gold fix report

(Harvey)

 

2 b) Gold/silver trading overnight Europe, Goldcore

(Mark O’Byrne/zerohedge

and in NY:  Bloomberg

3. ASIAN AFFAIRS

)Late WEDNESDAY night/THURSDAY morning: Shanghai closed UP 9.73 points or .29{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} /Hang Sang CLOSED UP 14.27 pts or .05{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} / The Nikkei closed UP 26.93 POINTS OR .13/Australia’s all ordinaires CLOSED DOWN 0.05{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528}/Chinese yuan (ONSHORE) closed DOWNat 6.6240/Oil UP to 52.09 dollars per barrel for WTI and 58.83 for Brent. Stocks in Europe OPENED IN THE GREEN EXCEPT SPAIN .  ONSHORE YUAN CLOSED DOWN AGAINST THE DOLLAR AT 6.6240. OFFSHORE YUAN CLOSED STRONGER TO THE ONSHORE YUAN AT 6.6231AND //ONSHORE YUANWEAKER AGAINST THE DOLLAR/OFF SHORE WEAKER TO THE DOLLLAR/. THE DOLLAR (INDEX) IS STRONGER AGAINST ALL MAJOR CURRENCIES. CHINA IS NOT PARTICULARLYHAPPY TODAY.

Read More @ HarveyOrganBlog.com

The Power Players Behind Silencing Wall Street Reformers

0

by Pam Martens and Russ Martens, Wall St On Parade:

America has now been through various iterations of “it’s time to stop bashing Wall Street” by writers who seem to easily get air time or plenty of print space to make their case. An OpEd in the New York Times today is the latest in this endless series. We’ll get to that column shortly, but first some necessary background.

Wall Street did not accidentally run a barge aground and leave a small oil slick on the Hudson River. Wall Street did not accidentally release tainted lettuce that sickened a few dozen people. What Wall Street did was intentional and criminal: it financially engineered a toxic subprime house of cards which it knew from its own internal reviews was going to collapse; it then molded the toxic product into inscrutable bundles; it sold the bundles to unsuspecting investors around the globe while making side bets that it would all come crashing down. Then, after causing the greatest financial collapse in the United States since the Great Depression, Wall Street’s unrepentant scoundrels paid themselves billions of dollars in bonuses with taxpayer bailout funds.

One of the largest wrongdoers of this era, Citigroup, received the largest taxpayer bailout in history (over $2.5 trillion in loans, cash infusions and asset guarantees) and while this was occurring, one of its executives, Michael Froman, was staffing up the administration of the next President of the United States, Barack Obama, including an accepted recommendation for the head of the Justice Department.

The 2007-2009 financial crash was more than the product of greed. There was both knowing and criminal wrongdoing, but none of those responsible have gone to jail. None of the regulatory gaps that allowed this to happen have been rectified. The biggest Wall Street banks have grown even bigger and remain too-big-to-fail; Wall Street is still paying the rating agencies for their Triple-A ratings; highly speculative Wall Street firms are still allowed to hold trillions of dollars in taxpayer-backstopped insured deposits in the commercial banks that they are allowed to own under a Byzantine bank-holding company structure with thousands of far-flung subsidiaries around the globe; and a handful of Wall Street banks continue to house trillions of dollars of derivatives inside their insured depository banks – something the public was assured would end under the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation.

Those who are lecturing the public to just get over it are either tone deaf, compromised or both.

In March 2016, the Editor-in-Chief Emeritus of Bloomberg News, Matt Winkler, wrote an opinion piece for Bloomberg News titled “Stop Bashing Wall Street. Times Have Changed.” Winkler absurdly wrote: “Banks also have reined in most of the proprietary trading in derivatives that brought them into conflict with their depositors.”

At the time Winkler made that ridiculous statement, Citigroup was loading up on the very same derivatives, credit default swaps, that blew up the big U.S. insurer, AIG, and added billions of dollars more to Citigroup’s own losses. (See our report: “Bailed Out Citigroup Is Going Full Throttle into Derivatives that Blew Up AIG.”)

In 2014 there was Politico’s Ben White preposterously asserting the following in a column headlined “How Washington beat Wall Street”: “In 2009, Washington went to war against big Wall Street banks hoping to blow up the kind of high-risk, high-reward strategies that helped spark the financial crisis. Five years later, that war is largely over. And Washington won in a blowout.”

The same day that White’s article ran, the Huffington Post published this retort from Dennis M. Kelleher, President and CEO of Better Markets, Inc., a public interest non-profit organization:

“Only in the warped, distorted, Alice-in-Wonderland world of Wall Street would one think ‘Washington went to war against big Wall Street banks’ or that ‘Washington won [the war] in a blowout,’ as said today in a Politico article…It may be counterintuitive, but the article reflects a fairy tale Wall Street loves to push. Not only that they have been picked on and been under/are under enormous pressure (almost all unfair, undeserved and counterproductive) by US and global regulators, politicians and policy makers, but, hey, they’ve lost and Washington won, so, ease up. No need to take any further action against the ginormous global too-big-to-fail banks that are bigger, more interconnected and dangerous than they were before the last crisis that they caused. No. Enough’s been done.

“Indeed, according to the article, the war is over. The American people should move on to other things. Washington should declare victory and return to its past practices of coddling the beaten Wall Street banks and cashing their campaign contribution checks. Nothing to do or see here.”

Before White, there was Maria Bartiromo’s appearance on Meet the Press in 2013 where she asserted that “We need to get beyond the conversation of is Wall Street evil.” Bartiromo spent two decades at CNBC before joining Fox Business Network in January 2014. At CNBC, as we previously reported, there appeared to be a co-branding operation in play between Bartiromo and Citigroup.

Now fast-forward to today’s OpEd in the New York Times, titled “Why Democrats Need Wall Street.” The column was written by Douglas Schoen, whose bio under the opinion piece offers simply this: “Douglas Schoen was a pollster and senior political adviser to President Bill Clinton from 1994 to 2000.” In reality, Schoen’s official bio at his website says he is “a founding partner and principle strategist for Penn, Schoen & Berland,” also known as PSB. In 2001, PSB was acquired by the marketing and communications juggernaut known as WPP, which owns the powerful strategic communications firm, Burson-Marsteller. The Worldwide President and CEO of Burson-Marsteller is serving simultaneously in the role of Chairman of PSB.

In the midst of the financial crisis in 2009, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow revealed that the disgraced insurance firm, AIG, which had backstopped Wall Street’s insane credit default swaps while failing to hold capital to pay them off and required a $185 billion bailout from the taxpayers, had hired Burson-Marsteller to “shine up” its image. (See Youtube video clip below.) Maddow described Burson-Marsteller as follows:

“Who’s Burson-Marsteller? Well, let me put it this way — when Blackwater killed those 17 Iraqi civilians in Baghdad, they called Burson-Marsteller. When there was a nuclear meltdown at Three Mile Island, Bobcock & Wilcox, who built that plant, called Burson-Marsteller. The Bhopal chemical disaster that killed thousands of people in India, Union Carbide called Burson-Marsteller. Romanian dictator, Nicolae Ceausescu — Burson-Marsteller. The government of Saudi Arabia, three days after 9/11 — Burson-Marsteller.

“The military junta that overthrew the government of Argentina in 1976, the generals dialed Burson-Marsteller. The government of Indonesia, accused of genocide in East Timor, Burson-Marsteller.

Read More @ WallStOnParade.com

The Deagel Report: An Eerily Accurate View Of What America Will Look Like In 2025 With Unfolding De-Population Events Underway

from All News Pipeline:

In this new story from Daisy Luther over at the Organic Prepper she asks a great question as her title, “If a North Korean EMP could kill 90{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} of Americans in a year, why did they just defund the Congressional EMP Commission?” 

As we reported on ANP back on October 12th, despite pleas from EMP experts such as Dr. William R. Graham and Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, the intelligence has fallen upon deaf ears and as this story over at The Hill reported, North Korea won the battle against America’s EMP Commission. Sadly, losing that battle could result in 90{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} of Americans dead within the year following such an attack and as was asked by Dr. Pry in this ANP story back on October 10thwill America’s epitaph be ‘died of stupidity’? Yet we need to remember that it WASN’T North Korea that killed the EMP Commission but those within America. 

And because of that, maybe we shouldn’t be surprised that the EMP Commission has been disbanded as their warnings have gone unheeded for nearly 17 years, leaving America’s biggest ‘achilles heal’ totally un-addressed. Despite more and more evidence that North Korea has the capability to launch such an attack upon America, we’re reminded that all they’d need was one successful attack to send America quite literally back to the dark ages. You can see the statement given by Dr. Pry and Dr. Graham to Congress in the Scribd document that we’ve embedded below videos

With America now suffering through one disaster to the next with droughts and fires, massive weather modification taking place across the country, what appears to be an orchestrated psy-op going on in Las Vegas with nothing making any sense with the coroners office there on lockdown and earth changes from the east coast to the west, we take a look within this story at why the website Deagel.com’s forecast for 2025 America likely gives us a very accurate view of what future America will look like. With depopulation events now happening across the nation, many more are likely on the way if the globalists goals are to be met. 

First, from the Organic Prepper story

So, for 17 years, this group has been ringing the warning bell and no one has been listening. Now that the threat is at our doorstep, their funding has been pulled. Something doesn’t add up.
 

Why would the EMP Commission suddenly be disbanded at a time when America may be under the greatest threat that we’ve ever been of an EMP attack with these same experts recently warning that 90{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} of Americans could die after such an attack upon us? If there really are ‘enemies of America within’ who want Americans dead in huge numbers such as those shown over at Deagel.com, there’d be no better way than an EMP attack upon us. 

Likely called either ‘fake news’ or a ‘conspiracy theory’ by the mainstream media and the general US population, the websiteDeagel.com is still forecasting an 85{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} drop in the population of America between now and 2025. With 324 million people living in the US in 2016, their bizarre forecast of only 54 million people living here in 2025 defies explanation. 

While the population density drop of 34 inhabitants per square mile in 2016 to only 6 inhabitants per square mile in 2025 as seen in the screenshot from Deagel above might delight those who find it difficult to live among huge crowds of people, they also put further emphasis upon what America might look like within only 7 years. The huge drops in both gross domestic product and GDP per capita show an America as a 3rd world nation, or an America sent back to the dark ages via an EMP attack that brings down our grid and is just beginning to truly rebuild our infrastructure.  

These numbers seen below also show an America whose military has been ‘neutered’ with a drop from $612 billion in military expenditures in 2016 to a forecast of only $8 billion spent upon the military in 2025. What does Deagel know that we don’t know? With purchase power parity forecast to drop from $57,300 in 2016 to only $11,304 in 2025, they see an America in 2025 looking almost as bad as Venezuela in 2016, which had a PPP of $15,100

Do these numbers show ‘the fall’ of America? It’s long been warned that for the globalists to complete their imposition of a global, totalitarian dictatorship, the strongest country must fall…and that is America
 

Read More @ AllNewsPipeline.com

Tying Harvey Weinstein to the Las vegas Event

from Miles Matthis:

As usual, this is just my opinion, take it or leave it

Yep, you read that right. There is a link between the two events. They didn’t come out almost simultaneously by accident.

This is going to be much shorter than my recent Las Vegas comments, but I do have something to say. Be patient, because I will make it worth your while. I’m sure Weinstein is a big creep, and I don’t like seeming to defend him, but this whole things stinks of yet another project. It reminds us of the recent Bill Cosby story, which is also a lie and a conjob. Just ask yourself this: do you think it is possible to fire a man from his own company for sexual harassment accusations? This is a country of law— allegedly—not a country of hearsay. Legally, you cannot be fired for accusations. You can only be fired for convictions. That is true for little ole you, working at the Five&Dime, but it is also true for CEOs of major companies. The law is supposed to be blind to such distinctions. So even if a company’s board of directors had the power to fire the majority owner and head of the company— which is doubtful—they still don’t have the legal authority to do so based on accusations. Weinstein should be suing for wrongful termination, but mysteriously we don’t see that. More logically, we should see him (and his family) firing his board of directors. So all this is fishy in the extreme.

As I said, Weinstein is no doubt a nasty person, but do you really think all these actresses accusing him of touching their tushies or whatever are any less nasty? Why believe them on a first reading? Shouldn’t they be required to prove these allegations in a court of law? Do you think no woman has ever lied about sexual harassment? Think again. People in the modern world are liars, and the richer they are the better they are at lying. And that includes women as well as men.

To be honest, I don’t really give a rat’s behind whether Weinstein grabbed someone or not. All the planted feminists are shouting that Affleck and Damon and all the Hollywood males are complicit in this, but—given the story we are expected to believe—do you know who else was complicit? The actresses who were grabbed and said nothing for years. Yeah. Why don’t you ask them why they are coming out now? Why not report it when it happened, if it was so awful? We know why: they wanted to get ahead and become famous and rich. Which they did. Which is why they are nasty. They were free to file charges, weren’t they? They were free to work somewhere else, with someone else. But they didn’t do that.  For that reason, I have trouble taking any of this seriously.

But it is even bigger than that, since I don’t believe any of this happened at all. I suspect it is just one more big stageplay. That is what these people do. They lie all day about everything. These are actors, actresses, and other Hollywood people, so—like politicians and media people—they are professional liars. Some play the heroes in these productions and others play the heavies. Also, remember that all these people in Hollywood—male and female—are gay. No guys are grabbing any woman’s naughty bits, since they are too busy grabbing eachothers’. Frankly, I don’t think the top actresses are lying here for money, since many of them already have a lot of that. What it looks like to me is that we have signs of a war between major Jewish families here, with some in Hollywood taking one side and some taking the other. Best guess is some big investment group wants control of The Weinstein Company, and this is the form of the hostile takeover. I showed you that this is how it is done now in my paper on John Lennon. There, after proving Lennon is still alive, I showed you how Blackrock/Blackstone wormed its way into Sony/ATV via the Michael Jackson fake molestation charges and later faked death. We also saw it in my analysis of the Aurora/Batman shooting in the same paper, where I showed you these big investment groups used that hoax to apply pressure to billionaire Philip Anschutz, owner of Cinemark theaters—where the fake shooting took place. They wanted to take over his profitable companies (AEG), which they almost did. In a rare turn of events, Anschutz—after appearing whipped —suddenly gave himself a pep talk, drank a Gatorade, and leapt back into the ring swinging. He fired his Blackrock advisors and is now richer than he was then. But that is not how it usually happens.

In the modern world, hostile takeovers aren’t just achieved with higher bids, shareholder pressure, or stock buyouts, they are achieved via black ops run against the opposing owners. Since some of the biggest billionaires control parts of the Intelligence apparatus, they can use a cadre of agents to run a project against the owner of a big company. I would say that is what is happening here with Weinstein. He is a lesser billionaire whose assets look tasty to the trillionaires.

Which means. . . the timing of this is no accident…

Read the entire PDF @ MilesMatthis.com