Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Ultra-Wealthy Elitists Are Having Their Brains Frozen So That They Can “Come Back To Life” 100s Of Years In The Future

by Michael Snyder, End Of The American Dream:

If you could live forever, would you do it? Throughout history, money has allowed the elite to buy just about anything they want – except an escape from death. Many super-rich individuals are deeply haunted by the knowledge that they have spent their lives working incredibly hard to accumulate vast amounts of wealth but they only have a very limited amount of time in which to enjoy it. As a result, many of them are absolutely obsessed with finding a way to cheat death. The quest for eternal life is very much alive today – especially in tech hotbeds such as Silicon Valley. As technology continues to increase at an exponential rate, many among the elite are absolutely convinced that eternal life will be possible someday, and they are determined to stick around long enough to be a part of that revolution.

Why is the Queen Funding The Clinton Crime Syndicate? Wet Works… Eugenics… Or Both?

Update/Correction: The original sources that reported the entire $241.5 million was going to the Clinton Foundation have amended that figure to $20 million to TCF. It’s still $20 million too much.
by SGT, SGT Report:

Enemies of the Clintons are mysteriously dying at a faster rate than ever before. And as far as the decades long Clinton body count goes, that’s saying a LOT.

Meanwhile, since Hilary had her corrupt NWO ass handed to her by the American people in the election, the pay-for-play donations to the Clinton Foundation which financial researcher Charles Ortel has called “the most corrupt foundation in the world”, have dried up.

So who’s going to pay for all of the wet works as the bodies keep piling up? Enter Queen Elizabeth, who via her puppet Justin Trudeau, just approved a $241.5 MILLION $20 MILLION donation to the Clinton crime syndicate (the remaining $221.5 MILLION is earmarked various global eugenics programs).

Miley Cyrus in “Black Mirror” as a Mind-Controlled Pop Star: It’s Not Fiction

from Vigilant Citizen:

In the Black Mirror episode “Rachel, Jack and Ashley Too”, Miley Cyrus plays the role of a mind-controlled pop star with a fake persona, who is tightly controlled and medicated by ruthless handlers. None of this is “science fiction”.

Warning: Massive spoilers ahead!

Since 2011, the Netflix series Black Mirror has been creeping out millions of viewers about the perverse effects of technology. While the series is considered to be “science fiction”, its episodes are nevertheless based on real-life trends and products that are already part of society today. The Black Mirror secret: To vividly demonstrate how we’re one misstep away from an Orwellian nightmare.

THE PEDO AGENDA: New Studies Promote Child-Adult Sex, Establishment is SILENT

The “powers-that-be no longer seem interested in drawing the boundary between ‘right’ and ‘perverse’ sex.” 

by Mark Regnerus, The Public Discourse:

Two new studies use a small amount of old data to try to undermine the idea that it is abusive or damaging for adults to have sex with minors. Disturbingly, no one seems to be challenging this conclusion.

The Archives of Sexual Behavior, a journal I respect and have recently published in and reviewed for, has printed a pair of studies by Bruce Rind in the past year. The recent publication of his work marks a significant, unnoticed, and unnerving turn in the dissemination and consumption of research on sex and sexuality.

Almost twenty years ago, both houses of Congress and the American Psychological Association condemned Rind’s claims, published in the August 1998 issue of Psychological Bulletinthat the long-term damages caused by child sexual abuse are overestimated. I would have thought that nearly twenty years, a concurrent resolution of Congress, and a fair bit of social trauma would have convinced him to shift topics.

But I was wrong. His new studies are on the same theme: sex between adults and minors as young as thirteen. Rind is banking on a more amenable political and scholarly atmosphere in which to conclude comparable things. And from the sound of it—or rather, the utter lack of sound—he has gotten his wish. There has been no congressional concern, no APA scrutiny, just silence.

So what do the studies say?

Old Data and Small Sample Sizes

The first study concerns adolescent girls’ first same-sex sexual experience, and mirrors an earlier one on boys. The data Rind uses, curiously enough, are the Kinsey data, collected by the famous early student of American sexual behavior Alfred Kinsey. These are old data—most of the participants were born before 1930—but that does not mean they have no value. Rind praises Kinsey because his was not a clinical sample, studying people who are seeking help of some sort. Agreed. But Kinsey is hardly representative. I don’t believe Kinsey’s data are a good guide to understanding what behavior was normative in its time, or in ours, given his nonrandom approach to locating participants. But neither do I believe that Kinsey’s interviewees were lying.

The second study is on the “long-term adjustment and functioning” of boys who experienced their first same-sex sexual experience with adult men, using data from the 1992 National Health and Social Life Survey (NHSLS). These data have a comparative advantage over Kinsey’s by being far more recent and population-based. Both articles seek to “test,” and purport to undermine, the child sexual abuse (CSA) framework in which “all minor-adult sexual interactions are considered abusive, traumatic, and psychologically injurious by nature.”

On average, girls in the Kinsey data set were fifteen years old at the time of their first same-sex sexual event with a woman (who was, on average, twenty-six years old). For men in the NHSLS, their mean age was fifteen and their partner was twenty-eight. In each study, fewer than half of the respondents describing such early same-sex experience currently identified as homosexual. Most of the women’s first experiences were what Rind termed “outercourse,” involving no oral sex or penetration (i.e., less invasive). The opposite was the case with boys, where oral sex was reported by 67 percent, and anal sex by 29 percent. In other words, these encounters were invasive and “severe,” Rind admits. “Despite this,” he argues, their “adjustment was not inferior to that in the comparison groups.” He makes this claim while admitting that only 19 percent of such male respondents said the sex was “wanted at the time,” well below the 54 percent who experienced first sex with age-similar peers. Sixty-seven percent “went along” and 14 percent report being forced, well above the 3 to 4 percent among other scenarios.

However, both Kinsey and the NHSLS suffer from very small sample sizes in Rind’s population of interest. We are talking about only twenty-six cases of girl-woman sexual events from a study that sought participants wherever it could find them, and twenty-one cases of boy-man sex from a population-based study. But since we are talking about very small samples, Rind is able to conclude that there is no difference among groups in having been forced into first sex. That is not how scientific literatures ought to be built, nor legal cases won. (But it is.)

Does Sex with Adults Have Negative Consequences for Minors?

The central claim of Rind’s studies, however, is that minor-adult sex tends not to be reported as a bad experience, as unwanted, or as one with longstanding negative consequences. Eighty-five percent of women who said their first same-sex sexual experience was as a minor with an adult told Kinsey interviewers they “much” enjoyed the experience. Sixty-three percent of comparable men reported “positive” reasons for participating in the act (an estimate far below that of those respondents who first had sex with a similar-age peer). Fewer than 10 percent said they knew their first (male) partner well.

Nevertheless, Rind believes the evidence vindicates him: “Men whose first postpubertal same-sex sexual experience was as a minor with an adult were as well adjusted as controls.” Such men reported to be “just as healthy, happy, sexually well adjusted, and successful in educational and career achievement.” It’s a tough conclusion to swallow. Recall, for example, the furor over atheist Richard Dawkins’s assertion about his boarding school sexual abuser, claiming that “I don’t think he did any of us lasting harm.” Rind concludes similarly about teen girls’ first same-sex experience. This result, he holds, “is sharply at odds with the pathology perspectives” (that is, the sexual abuse narrative). In fact, the results “showed that same-sex attracted adolescent minors were especially receptive to these relations.”

As a social scientist of sexual behavior who is surprised by very little, I’m willing to admit that it is possible for this to be the case, while holding firmly to the assertion that such events remain diabolical and an unequivocal abuse of power. Moreover, the emotional consequences of teen sex with adults are something that may never be readily accessible to “discursive consciousness,” those experiences and emotions to which humans have conscious access, can understand, and verbally express and evaluate.

Pleasure, Power, and Sexual Exploitation

I ran Rind’s studies past a friend of mine who had experienced it all—childhood molestation by an opposite-sex older relative and then a sustained relationship of same-sex “outercourse” initiated by a counselor who was eighteen years her senior. Like many in Rind’s study, she “went along” due to the counselor’s manipulation. She spoke of willingness, well short of enthusiasm, in order not to threaten the relationship. The sexual activity became mutual. And yet it was all exploitative, and deeply damaging.

At twenty years old, she was legally of age. Yet she sees obvious parallels between minor-adult relationships and therapist-client relationships: there are inherent power imbalances in both that make sexual contact of any kind wrong. Even mutual desire or initiation by the youth or the client cannot erase these power differences, as all professional and legal establishments used to understand.

Read More @ ThePublicDiscourse.com

Tech Times: Florida startup harvests young blood to sell to the wealthy for $8k a liter

by Erin Elizabeth, Health Nut News:

The Florida-based startup Ambrosia, founded in 2016 by Stanford Medical School graduate Jesse Karmazin, offer new, young plasma to help combat against the aging process for patients 30 years and older. They have six locations around the country (Phoenix, AZ, Los Angeles, CA, San Francisco, CA, Tampa, FL, Omaha, NE and Houston, TX) and the price starts at $8,000 for one liter. The plasma is from carefully screened donors between 16 and 25 years old.

Meet the Elite: Father of Mainstream Media, Skull and Bones Member Henry Luce

0

by Markab Algedi, Activist Post:

Henry Luce could be titled the “father of mainstream media.” He was referred to as “the most influential private citizen in America of his day.”

The person behind LifeFortune, and Time magazines, his cooperation with the powers of his day perfectly demonstrate what “the elite” is, and how power works today. His influence, connection to American industrialists, and membership in the secret society Skull and Bones at Yale University make him a relevant character to learn about.

Luce’s Time magazine was founded in the mid-1920s with the help of money from J.P. Morgan figures, Rockefeller’s Standard Oil associates, and other influential individuals and entities. It seems his career was seeded by the “robber barons.”

Henry Luce married with two separate ceremonies: one regular wedding, and one “Skull and Bones wedding.” He married Lila Ross Hotz, who belonged to a wealthy Chicago family similar to the McCormick family that connected Luce to power.

Henry was born in Tengchow, China, the son of a Presbyterian missionary named Henry Winters Luce on April 3rd, 1898. In 1905 he was sent to the United States. In Chicago, his family met Nancy Fowler McCormick, the wealthy widow of Cyrus McCormick: a powerful man from the McCormick family.

The story goes that Nancy was “so impressed with the seven year old Henry that she asked for permission to raise him in America.”

That line reads like a page out of the robber baron descendant David Rockefeller biography, in which David just happens upon some of the most prominent positions a man could find.

Nancy McCormick’s husband Cyrus was a member of one of America’s robber baron families. According to Wikipedia:

Cyrus Hall McCormick (February 15, 1809 – May 13, 1884) was an American inventor and businessperson, the founder of the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company, which later became part of the International Harvester Company in 1902. From the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia, he and many members of his family became prominent residents of Chicago.

He was born to inventor Robert McCormick who was essentially the patriarch of the family, having invented a version of the reaper. Robert’s father Robert McCormick Sr. was an American Revolutionary War veteran: power is passed on.

The well-connected Nancy McCormick introduced him to opportunities, and another member of that family, Robert R. McCormick, was the owner of the Chicago Tribune.

Read More @ ActivistPost.com

DISNEY’S DESCENDANTS 2: SATANIC INDOCTRINATION FOR KIDS

0

from Beginning and End:

As  Hollywood continues to push Satanic rebellion into the hearts and minds of children, the Disney’s Descendants movie series has taken the indoctrination to an entirely new level. The series has been a massive success for the Disney franchise as millions of children and pre-teens have tuned in. The movie series – a spinoff of prior Disney stories and the movie Maleficent – casts evil villains as heroes and celebrates wickedness, sinful rebellion and the occult. All the while it subtly and deceptively reinvents the story of the fall of Lucifer and his fallen angels.

DESCENDANTS VILLAINS: TRULY ROTTEN TO THE CORE

 The temptation of the forbidden fruit is constantly promoted in the Descendants films.
The temptation of the forbidden fruit is constantly promoted in the Descendants films.

The Descendants film is about the children of some of the more famous  Disney villains (Maleficent, the Evil Snow Queen, Cruella De Vil, Captain Hook, etc.), who along with their parents have been banished to the “Isle of the Lost.”  They are given a chance to infiltrate a peaceful kingdom and bring their wicked ways there.  The film makes no secret in its symbolism of a bitten apple logo with a serpent-like vine wrapped around it. It is a not-so-subtle allusion to Adam and Eve eating the forbidden fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil in the Bible:

“Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?  And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:  But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.  And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:

“For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.  And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.”  – Genesis 3:1-6.

Satan deceived Eve by distorting God’s words (The Lord did not forbid “every tree.” Only one), calling God a liar (telling her she would not die if she ate the forbidden fruit) and slandering God (telling her that the fruit would make her god-like, implying that God wanted to keep this knowledge and ability from her).

And just like that, what was once evil and dangerous to Eve became exciting and alluring. This is the precise deception of Descendants as it repeatedly portrays sinful rebellion, wickedness and witchcraft as fun and cool.

Continuing the theme of eating the forbidden apple, the original Descendants movie opens up with the song “Rotten To the Core”:

The first image of the video is Mal (the daughter of Maleficent from Sleeping Beauty), spray painting “Long Live Evil” on a wall.

 The main character Mal spray paints the film’s mantra: Long Live Evil.
The main character Mal spray paints the film’s mantra: Long Live Evil.

You are here: Home / Entertainment / Disney’s Descendants 2: Satanic Indoctrination For Kids

DISNEY’S DESCENDANTS 2: SATANIC INDOCTRINATION FOR KIDS

August 1, 2017 By Beginning and End

The Descendants 2 movie calls evil good and good evil.

As  Hollywood continues to push Satanic rebellion into the hearts and minds of children, the Disney’s Descendants movie series has taken the indoctrination to an entirely new level. The series has been a massive success for the Disney franchise as millions of children and pre-teens have tuned in. The movie series – a spinoff of prior Disney stories and the movie Maleficent – casts evil villains as heroes and celebrates wickedness, sinful rebellion and the occult. All the while it subtly and deceptively reinvents the story of the fall of Lucifer and his fallen angels.

DESCENDANTS VILLAINS: TRULY ROTTEN TO THE CORE

The temptation of the forbidden fruit is constantly promoted in the Descendants films.

The Descendants film is about the children of some of the more famous  Disney villains (Maleficent, the Evil Snow Queen, Cruella De Vil, Captain Hook, etc.), who along with their parents have been banished to the “Isle of the Lost.”  They are given a chance to infiltrate a peaceful kingdom and bring their wicked ways there.  The film makes no secret in its symbolism of a bitten apple logo with a serpent-like vine wrapped around it. It is a not-so-subtle allusion to Adam and Eve eating the forbidden fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil in the Bible:

“Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?  And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:  But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.  And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:

“For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.  And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.”  – Genesis 3:1-6.

Satan deceived Eve by distorting God’s words (The Lord did not forbid “every tree.” Only one), calling God a liar (telling her she would not die if she ate the forbidden fruit) and slandering God (telling her that the fruit would make her god-like, implying that God wanted to keep this knowledge and ability from her).

And just like that, what was once evil and dangerous to Eve became exciting and alluring. This is the precise deception of Descendants as it repeatedly portrays sinful rebellion, wickedness and witchcraft as fun and cool.

Continuing the theme of eating the forbidden apple, the original Descendants movie opens up with the song “Rotten To the Core”:

The first image of the video is Mal (the daughter of Maleficent from Sleeping Beauty), spray painting “Long Live Evil” on a wall.

The main character Mal spray paints the film’s mantra: Long Live Evil.

While of course the basic message is her rebellion and vandalism, her writing of “Evil” with the letters backwards is a part of the Occult Law of Reversal. This concept, strongly endorsed by satanist Aleister Crowley, teaches that occult powers can be enhanced when words or writings are done backwards:

Those who want fame, power, spell-casting abilities, demons at their beck and call, and to recognize the godhead within, as well as to know the past, present, and future, he extolled to his apt students, must consistently, with intensity, practice talking (reverse speech), walking, thinking, and playing phonograph records, backwards. This is a form of divination, and we are warned against this in the Holy Bible.” (source). 

Reverse writing is found all over the video.

Read More @ BeginningandEnd.com