Thursday, July 2, 2020

Could JACOB ROTHSCHILD Be Among the Dead in Plane-Helicopter Collision Near Waddesdon Manor?

0

from Your News Wire:

Lord Jacob Rothschild and four other people are feared dead after a plane and helicopter crashed in mid-air over the Rothschild estate in Buckinghamshire on Friday afternoon.

Wreckage from both aircraft fell from the sky after local residents reported hearing a loud bang shortly after midday. According to authorities, the pilot of the helicopter and its single passenger, as well as the pilot and a passenger of the plane all died in the crash.

A local resident, speaking to reporters, said: “My father heard a loud bang. My mother said a man, who I think was someone who had been out walking nearby, then went running up to the manor to say there had been a crash.”

“It didn’t happen directly over the grounds, but in woodland nearby. My father ran up to the scene. Everyone is helping the emergency services.”

Nathaniel Charles Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild, is a member of the powerful elite Rothschild banking family.

The Rothschild’s are commonly believed to have engineered WWI in order to force the British government into creating Israel by getting them to sign the Balfour Declaration in 1917.

Lord Rothschild also boasted that the New World Order, which is family heads, would be in place by 2018.

Daily Mail reports: At least seven fire engines and three search and rescue vehicles rushed to the scene after the first 999 call came in at 12.06pm.

Police vehicles arrived at the crash site and officers have put up evidence tents in the woodland. Crash experts are attempting to piece together what happened.

Rescue workers had launched the fire brigade’s drone over the fallen wreckage in a bid to locate any survivors, but it is understood no one was taken to hospital.

Flight data shows a two-seater helicopter was flying at 1,025ft in the area at the time, but suddenly went of radar shortly after 12 noon. It had only been in the air for 15 minutes.

 Aerial image of crash scene
Aerial image of crash scene

The plane that crashed is believed to be a Cessna 152, a popular training aircraft which has space for only one pilot and one passenger.

A Cessna 152 took off from Wycombe Air Park around the same time as the helicopter. It disappeared from radar at the same time as the helicopter.

The plane thought to have been involved was made in 1982. The helicopter feared to have crashed was built earlier this year.

Staff from the Waddesdon Estate, which is managed by a foundation set up by the eminent Rothschild family, helped direct emergency vehicles to the scene of the tragedy as police threw up a massive cordon around the area to preserve the scene.

 

Read More @ YourNewsWire.com

 

 

Symbolic Pics of the Month 05/19

from Vigilant Citizen:

In this edition of SPOTM: Millie Bobby Brown, Greta Thunberg, a “drag kid” and Netflix doing its best to put the one-eye sign in our faces.

The 16-year-old Swedish girl Greta Thunberg is currently (as media puts it) “one of the hottest names in global politics”. Since 2018, the self-declared autist has been constantly making headlines for her speeches and protests about climate change. Here, Thunberg is on the cover of i-D magazine. One of her eyes is hidden with a token saying “Save our Climate”. That one-eye sign is an indication that she is being used by the elite.

The Meaning of YG’s Video “In The Dark”: Is it About Blood Sacrifice?

from Vigilant Citizen:

YG’s video “In the Dark” contains overt occult and satanic symbolism. It also appears to refer to the death if Nipsey Hussle in a dark and gruesome matter. Is the video actually about a blood sacrifice?

YG is a rapper from Compton, California who released his first single in 2009. Since then, he got signed with Def Jam records and released a steady stream of mixtapes and albums, amounting to an ever-growing fanbase. Other than a few radio hits, YG is mostly known for FDT (F*** Donald Trump), a protest song released a few months prior to Trump’s election.

THE NEPHILIM AND THE GREAT SECRET OF THE OCCULT

The occult mystery kept secret for thousands of years is connected to the Nephilim of Genesis 6.

from Beginning and End:

In our previous installment Wars of The Nephilim KingsBeginning And End referenced an occult secret linked to the Nephilim.  Something that many in the New Age and occult societies acknowledge is in the Bible. What do the symbols of Freemasonry, alchemy and many other mystic groups mean?  What is the mystery they have been concealing for centuries? This article will explain from the pages of Scripture. 

A SECRET HIDDEN IN THE BIBLE?

Among the foremost leaders of the mystery schools and New Age movement, there was an acknowledgment this special knowledge was contained in the pages of the Holy Bible.  Albert Pike, 33rd degree Freemason philosopher, Confederate War General and Luciferian wrote:

“Therein is the secret fire, living and philosophical, of which all the Hermetic philosophers speak with the most mysterious reserve: the Universal Seed, the secret whereof they kept, and which they represented only under the figure of the Caduceus of Hermes. This is the grand Hermetic arcanum…. So that the Great Work is more than a chemical operation; it is a real creation of the human word initiated into the power of the Word of God.” – Morals and Dogma, Albert Pike, p 501-502.

Other esoteric sources also credit the Bible for having this knowledge:

“The reason…is that there exist powerful secrets hidden in the pages of this ancient book [the Bible]… a vast collection of untapped wisdom waiting to be unveiled.” – The Lost Symbol, Dan Brown, p. 489.

“The great Masonic truths, concealed among the learned of former ages under allegories and fables, are therefore lost– long long lost! But what is lost is not consequently destroyed – what is lost may be found, and all that is required is some clue or key. Fortunately there are applicable keys, held sacred by a body of men who know not their use, and the locks these keys fit are held sacred by all modern clergy, and the multitude of religionists. The first and best evidence of the truthfulness of the keys is their being used to interpret the Bible – that heavenly book of truth.” – The Ignorant Learned, p. 15-16.

What is this hidden knowledge? One source gives a subtle hint:

“I knelt beneath the cedars old and hoar
That streak with verdure snowy Lebanon;
The mountain eagles o er the patriarchs soar,
The thunder clouds of summer grimly frown,
Where large and strong they stand those giants of renown” – Freemasonry in The Holy Land, p. 604.

THE FUSION OF OPPOSITES – GENESIS 6

 The secret was revealed to the prophet Daniel.
The secret was revealed to the prophet Daniel.

The secret is The Fusion of Opposites – a term commonly used in the Christian community by Pastor Mike Hoggard of Bethel Baptist Church. What the occult societies and new age mystics have concealed is that the path to attaining godhood and immortality is found in Genesis 6 – the account of the fallen angelic Sons of God marrying the daughters of men and giving birth to the Nephilim giants – hybrid supermen who dominated the antediluvian world.  The great expectation of the occult is a future age where the angels interact with humanity that can revive that era and turn men to gods. 

The Biblical source for this is found in Daniel chapter 2. In this chapter, the power of the God of the Bible comes in direct conflict with the occult. King Nebuchadnezzar, ruler of ancient Babylon and the most powerful man on Earth at that time, woke from a nightmare so terrifying he called all his court astrologers, wizards and mystics to give him the interpretation. Adding to the challenge was that that the king could not remember the content of the dream – requiring clear supernatural insight to answer his request.  The occult advisors to the king were powerless to respond:

“Then the king commanded to call the magicians, and the astrologers, and the sorcerers, and the Chaldeans, for to shew the king his dreams. So they came and stood before the king. 3 And the king said unto them, I have dreamed a dream, and my spirit was troubled to know the dream. 4 Then spake the Chaldeans to the king in Syriack, O king, live for ever: tell thy servants the dream, and we will shew the interpretation. 5 The king answered and said to the Chaldeans, The thing is gone from me: if ye will not make known unto me the dream, with the interpretation thereof, ye shall be cut in pieces, and your houses shall be made a dunghill.

6 But if ye shew the dream, and the interpretation thereof, ye shall receive of me gifts and rewards and great honour: therefore shew me the dream, and the interpretation thereof. 7 They answered again and said, Let the king tell his servants the dream, and we will shew the interpretation of it. 8 The king answered and said, I know of certainty that ye would gain the time, because ye see the thing is gone from me. 9 But if ye will not make known unto me the dream, there is but one decree for you: for ye have prepared lying and corrupt words to speak before me, till the time be changed: therefore tell me the dream, and I shall know that ye can shew me the interpretation thereof.

10 The Chaldeans answered before the king, and said, There is not a man upon the earth that can shew the king’s matter: therefore there is no king, lord, nor ruler, that asked such things at any magician, or astrologer, or Chaldean. 11 And it is a rare thing that the king requireth, and there is none other that can shew it before the king, except the gods, whose dwelling is not with flesh. 12 For this cause the king was angry and very furious, and commanded to destroy all the wise men of Babylon.” –Daniel 2:2-12.

The royal sorcerers told the king that it was impossible for any mere human to supernaturally look in the recesses of the king’s memory, find out what he dreamt and then interpret that dream for him. This provoked the king to order the death of any wise man. The prophet Daniel was living in captivity in the king’s court in Babylon at that time.  When he heard of the decree to kill the wise men he requested an audience with the king and then prayed to God for the answer:

Read More @ BeginningandEnd.com

Exposing the Cabal, Illuminati, Deep State, Globalists, and Global Elites that Rule the World

from Humans Are Free:

Since my awakening in 2013, I started reading a lot of information about the Cabal, Illuminati. Some articles and posts on social media claimed that Jews control the world affairs and that the Cabal, or the ruling Elites, is equivalent to Jews.

I read about this topic both in English and in Hebrew, as Israeli Jewish journalists and activists investigate this topic, too. I was very intrigued about the information that I’ve read.

Is This the Last Generation Humans? Major Revelations and Big Changes Lie Ahead

by Dave Hodges, The Common Sense Show:

This is the beginning of several revelations of who is really in charge of what is happening on the planet, what I know about (free) energy, and the future of the planet as some entities would have it. This story cannot be told in one article or one interview. However, ex-NSA Vance Davis and myself have made a decision to tell what we know on certain topics that are not spoken of in open circles. Because there is some risk involved, much of this has already been disseminated to several knowledgeable people for safekeeping and self-preservation.

Vance and I had already recorded the first of a tell-all interview regarding our dealings with Enron, Ken Lay, free energy technology not of terrestrial origin,Tesla links to this story, and the near-future of mankind. I want to be clear on this point. In 1993, Vance Davis was among the first, if not the very first who revealed what was coming over two decades later with regard to transhumanism. The latter aspect of these revelations will be covered in a later presentation.

THE PEDO AGENDA: New Studies Promote Child-Adult Sex, Establishment is SILENT

The “powers-that-be no longer seem interested in drawing the boundary between ‘right’ and ‘perverse’ sex.” 

by Mark Regnerus, The Public Discourse:

Two new studies use a small amount of old data to try to undermine the idea that it is abusive or damaging for adults to have sex with minors. Disturbingly, no one seems to be challenging this conclusion.

The Archives of Sexual Behavior, a journal I respect and have recently published in and reviewed for, has printed a pair of studies by Bruce Rind in the past year. The recent publication of his work marks a significant, unnoticed, and unnerving turn in the dissemination and consumption of research on sex and sexuality.

Almost twenty years ago, both houses of Congress and the American Psychological Association condemned Rind’s claims, published in the August 1998 issue of Psychological Bulletinthat the long-term damages caused by child sexual abuse are overestimated. I would have thought that nearly twenty years, a concurrent resolution of Congress, and a fair bit of social trauma would have convinced him to shift topics.

But I was wrong. His new studies are on the same theme: sex between adults and minors as young as thirteen. Rind is banking on a more amenable political and scholarly atmosphere in which to conclude comparable things. And from the sound of it—or rather, the utter lack of sound—he has gotten his wish. There has been no congressional concern, no APA scrutiny, just silence.

So what do the studies say?

Old Data and Small Sample Sizes

The first study concerns adolescent girls’ first same-sex sexual experience, and mirrors an earlier one on boys. The data Rind uses, curiously enough, are the Kinsey data, collected by the famous early student of American sexual behavior Alfred Kinsey. These are old data—most of the participants were born before 1930—but that does not mean they have no value. Rind praises Kinsey because his was not a clinical sample, studying people who are seeking help of some sort. Agreed. But Kinsey is hardly representative. I don’t believe Kinsey’s data are a good guide to understanding what behavior was normative in its time, or in ours, given his nonrandom approach to locating participants. But neither do I believe that Kinsey’s interviewees were lying.

The second study is on the “long-term adjustment and functioning” of boys who experienced their first same-sex sexual experience with adult men, using data from the 1992 National Health and Social Life Survey (NHSLS). These data have a comparative advantage over Kinsey’s by being far more recent and population-based. Both articles seek to “test,” and purport to undermine, the child sexual abuse (CSA) framework in which “all minor-adult sexual interactions are considered abusive, traumatic, and psychologically injurious by nature.”

On average, girls in the Kinsey data set were fifteen years old at the time of their first same-sex sexual event with a woman (who was, on average, twenty-six years old). For men in the NHSLS, their mean age was fifteen and their partner was twenty-eight. In each study, fewer than half of the respondents describing such early same-sex experience currently identified as homosexual. Most of the women’s first experiences were what Rind termed “outercourse,” involving no oral sex or penetration (i.e., less invasive). The opposite was the case with boys, where oral sex was reported by 67 percent, and anal sex by 29 percent. In other words, these encounters were invasive and “severe,” Rind admits. “Despite this,” he argues, their “adjustment was not inferior to that in the comparison groups.” He makes this claim while admitting that only 19 percent of such male respondents said the sex was “wanted at the time,” well below the 54 percent who experienced first sex with age-similar peers. Sixty-seven percent “went along” and 14 percent report being forced, well above the 3 to 4 percent among other scenarios.

However, both Kinsey and the NHSLS suffer from very small sample sizes in Rind’s population of interest. We are talking about only twenty-six cases of girl-woman sexual events from a study that sought participants wherever it could find them, and twenty-one cases of boy-man sex from a population-based study. But since we are talking about very small samples, Rind is able to conclude that there is no difference among groups in having been forced into first sex. That is not how scientific literatures ought to be built, nor legal cases won. (But it is.)

Does Sex with Adults Have Negative Consequences for Minors?

The central claim of Rind’s studies, however, is that minor-adult sex tends not to be reported as a bad experience, as unwanted, or as one with longstanding negative consequences. Eighty-five percent of women who said their first same-sex sexual experience was as a minor with an adult told Kinsey interviewers they “much” enjoyed the experience. Sixty-three percent of comparable men reported “positive” reasons for participating in the act (an estimate far below that of those respondents who first had sex with a similar-age peer). Fewer than 10 percent said they knew their first (male) partner well.

Nevertheless, Rind believes the evidence vindicates him: “Men whose first postpubertal same-sex sexual experience was as a minor with an adult were as well adjusted as controls.” Such men reported to be “just as healthy, happy, sexually well adjusted, and successful in educational and career achievement.” It’s a tough conclusion to swallow. Recall, for example, the furor over atheist Richard Dawkins’s assertion about his boarding school sexual abuser, claiming that “I don’t think he did any of us lasting harm.” Rind concludes similarly about teen girls’ first same-sex experience. This result, he holds, “is sharply at odds with the pathology perspectives” (that is, the sexual abuse narrative). In fact, the results “showed that same-sex attracted adolescent minors were especially receptive to these relations.”

As a social scientist of sexual behavior who is surprised by very little, I’m willing to admit that it is possible for this to be the case, while holding firmly to the assertion that such events remain diabolical and an unequivocal abuse of power. Moreover, the emotional consequences of teen sex with adults are something that may never be readily accessible to “discursive consciousness,” those experiences and emotions to which humans have conscious access, can understand, and verbally express and evaluate.

Pleasure, Power, and Sexual Exploitation

I ran Rind’s studies past a friend of mine who had experienced it all—childhood molestation by an opposite-sex older relative and then a sustained relationship of same-sex “outercourse” initiated by a counselor who was eighteen years her senior. Like many in Rind’s study, she “went along” due to the counselor’s manipulation. She spoke of willingness, well short of enthusiasm, in order not to threaten the relationship. The sexual activity became mutual. And yet it was all exploitative, and deeply damaging.

At twenty years old, she was legally of age. Yet she sees obvious parallels between minor-adult relationships and therapist-client relationships: there are inherent power imbalances in both that make sexual contact of any kind wrong. Even mutual desire or initiation by the youth or the client cannot erase these power differences, as all professional and legal establishments used to understand.

Read More @ ThePublicDiscourse.com

The Blatant “Occult Elite” Symbolism at the 2020 Vogue Ball in Brazil

from Vigilant Citizen:

Every year, shortly before the Rio Carnival, the global fashion powerhouse Vogue organizes an extravagant ball that features some of Brazil’s biggest stars and personalities wearing outfits following a specific theme. Although the theme is different every year, the real, underlying theme of these events is always the same: Blatant occult elite symbolism.

For instance, a couple of years ago, the theme was “The Mysticism of Lady Zodiac”. And, since a couple of zodiac signs have horns, it was the perfect occasion to have Brazilian stars dressed as if they were brides of Baphomet.

Illuminati Symbolic Pics of the Month 09/17

0

from Vigilant Citizen:

In this edition of SPOTM: Gwen Stephani, Miley Cyrus, Harrison Ford, and more proof that one-eye symbolism is a requirement to remain in the good graces of the entertainment industry.

David Lachappelle, one of the elite’s favorite photographers, released a new art book. Miley Cyrus, one of the elite’s favorite slaves, is used to promote that book. As it is often the case with Lachapelle pics using industry slaves, the result is extremely symbolic. Here, Miley poses completely naked inside a desolate jail cell, reaching out for the sun.

In the next picture, Miley is transformed into a colorful butterfly and a bunch of flowers grew around her. This is 100{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} about Monarch programming. In the twisted symbolism of mind control, slaves who have been successfully programmed are depicted with butterfly wings – the insect that begins as a caterpillar to transform into a beautiful butterfly. In both pictures, Miley is naked (representing that the fact that she’s defenseless and possibly a Beta slave). Also, in both pics, she’s still inside her cell (representing the fact that the butterfly thing is all inside her head). That David Lachapelle book should be very symbolic.

As usual, the one-eye sign popped up everywhere in mainstream media in the past month. It can be seen on the cover of magazines, on the cover of music albums, on movie posters, and even on non-relevant ads. We are constantly reminded of who owns this entire industry, yet very few people actually see it.

Ryan Gosling stars in the upcoming movie Bladerunner 2049. Wired Magazine published an article promoting that movie and this is the main picture of the article. One-Eye. In your face. Tell a friend. Also, that robot head above Ryan has something going on in the right eye as well.

Harrison Ford is the other star of Bladerunner 2049. He was featured in the cover story of GQ magazine to promote that movie as well. Once again, the one-eye sign. In your face. Tell a friend.

To make 100{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} sure that you understand that there is nothing “random” about this one-eye thing, here’s another one. There is something sad about these old guys forced to do these ridiculous signs to stay relevant. 

Read More @ VigilantCitizen.com