Tuesday, February 7, 2023

Five Reasons To Be Absolutely Certain That The Establishment Is Lying About Syria

0

by Caitlin Johnstone, Medium:

Whenever you see UN Ambassador Nikki Haley on video she’s trying to start World War Three. At today’s UN Security Council Haley gave remarks about why the UN should “take action” against two of the US power establishment’s favorite targets, Russia and the Syrian government, due to allegations that Bashar al-Assad has been using chemical weapons.

That’s right, just three weeks after the Trump administration unveiled its planto keep thousands of US troops in Syria in order to force regime change, the tired old chemical weapons allegations have been unearthed and recirculated to trusting western mainstream media audiences.

I am not a Syria expert by any stretch of the imagination. If you want detailed information about what’s really going on in that nation I recommend getting in touch with real Syrians online and following the work of independent investigative journalists who regularly go there like Vanessa Beeley. Nevertheless, despite my lack of boots-on-the-ground expertise and intimate knowledge of every detail of what’s going on in that country, I am absolutely certain that the western power establishment is lying very extensively about what is going on in Syria.

One hundred percent certain, zero margin for error. I’d bet my life on it.

How can I be so sure? I’ll show you.

There are many, many, many piles of evidence substantiating the fact that the Syrian government has become the target of what is surely one of the largest and most sophisticated propaganda campaigns in human history, but most people don’t have time to comb through all the tiny details and sort through the complexities of what’s what. For this reason I thought it would be useful to compile a short list for people who, like me, don’t have time to dedicate themselves intimately to the in-depth study of Syria. This list makes it abundantly clear that there is an organized disinformation campaign saturating mainstream narratives about what is happening in Syria, making it therefore impossible to place any faith in the reports that are coming out about that nation’s government today. All you need is a little information and critical thinking.

Without further ado, here are five reasons why you can be as absolutely certain of the mass media’s deception in this area as I am.

1. The Bana Alabed CNN interview

I point to this one a lot. If you haven’t yet figured out that mainstream media outlets are tools of outrageous war propaganda, and you watch this interviewwith your eyes wide open, your jaw will drop to the floor and you will never see the world the same again.

After the highly suspicious and hotly disputed accusations of sarin gas use by the Syrian government in the Idlib province back in April of last year, a little girl was paraded before the CNN audience to condemn Assad and plead for western intervention. Anyone watching the interview can see that it is very obviously scripted, and the little girl is sounding out pre-written syllables in a way that children simply do not speak, using words and concepts that no seven year-old could possibly understand. This is self-evident to anyone who doesn’t have a vested interest in not seeing it.

Additionally, other video footage from around the same time showed that the girl did not speak English enough to even understand basic questions about what kind of food she likes to eat, instead regurgitating the pre-scripted line “Save the children of Syria” in response.

More disturbingly, because this interview was scripted, it means that CNN’s Alisyn Camerota necessarily had the other half of the script the girl was reading from. A prominent newscaster from a top US mainstream media outlet knowingly participated in a fake, scripted interview designed to manufacture support for western military interventionism, and sold it to CNN’s audience as a real interview.

Read More @ Medium.com

China To Change Constitution, Allowing Xi To Stay In Power Forever

0

from ZeroHedge:

In an announcement that was already expected by the general public and largely a forgone conclusion, China’s Communist Party has officially cleared the way for President Xi Jinping to rule as emperor for life by announcing on Sunday that it intends to abolish a two-term constitutional limit on the presidency.

The change to the country’s constitution follows the decision during last October’s National People’s Congress to enshrine Xi’s name in the country’s constitution (see “Xi Could Rule For “Decades” As China’s New Leadership Team Unveiled“), making him the first living leader to be granted such an honor.

In addition, the Party’s appointments to the Politburo lacked a clear successor to Xi, another sign that he intends to seek a third term after the conclusion of his second term, which has only just begun.

As the NYT reports, citing local media, the Central Committee approved the amendments to the Constitution at a meeting last month. But the vague official announcement released at that time did not hint at the momentous expansion of Mr. Xi’s presidential power, which was kept secret until Sunday.

In another victory for Mr. Xi, the draft amendments to the Constitution would also add his trademark expression for his main ideas – “Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era” – into the preamble of the Constitution, as well as adding a nod to the ideological contributions of his predecessor, Mr. Hu.

The amendments are almost certain to be passed into law by the party-controlled legislature, the National People’s Congress, which holds its annual full session from March 5. The congress has never voted down a proposal from party leaders.

“Sunday’s move will make Mr. Xi much more powerful than he already was, and will dampen any remnants of resistance to his rule”, said Zhang Baohui, professor of international affairs at Lingnan University in Hong Kong.

“Once people know he will serve for who knows how long, it will strengthen his power and motivate everybody to bandwagon with him,” said Mr. Zhang. “Any rival will think he will be almighty.”

In other words, “Dear Leader” has returned.

* * *

This historic shift was predicted by many since last fall, when Xi refused to appoint a successor as his power would begin to wane in a year or two as he entered what would’ve been a lame duck period for his presidency – the second half of his second term.

At the same party congress, Mr. Xi conspicuously broke with precedent by choosing not to name a pair of much younger officials to the Politburo’s ruling inner circle, the seven-member standing committee, to serve as his heirs-in-waiting. Instead, Mr. Xi chose men — no women — who were closer to his own age or older.

Mr. Xi’s strongman style has been compared to that of the Russian president, Vladimir V. Putin. But even Mr. Putin, who has amassed considerable personal power, did not try to erase his country’s constitutional limit on serving more than two consecutive terms as president as he approached that limit in 2008.

Instead, he arranged for a close adviser with limited personal influence, Dmitri A. Medvedev, to serve as president for a single term while Mr. Putin held the post of prime minister. Mr. Putin then returned to the presidency in 2012, and is running this year for re-election to another term.

Mr. Xi may now have even greater power, and the question will be how he chooses to use it.

“Xi Jinping is susceptible to making big mistakes because there are now almost no checks or balances,” said Willy Lam, an adjunct professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong who is the author of a biography of Mr. Xi in 2015. “Essentially, he has become emperor for life.”

In another Xi-approved break with tradition, Wang Qishan, a close ally of the president’s who helped carry out Xi’s campaign against corruption and disloyalty in the party, appears set to return to power as vice president. Wang, 69, stepped down from a party position last year because of his age.

Read More @ ZeroHedge.com

7 Deceptions Inside Democrats’ Rebuttal of GOP FISA Memo

0

by Aaron Klein, Breitbart:

NEW YORK — Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee on Saturday released a purported rebuttal to a four-page House Republican memo from earlier this month that alleges abuse of surveillance authority on the part of Obama-era federal agencies.

The Democratic rebuttal contains misleading claims, omits key details, and, perhaps unintentionally, actually proves the FBI and Department of Justice utilized the infamous, largely discredited 35-page anti-Trump dossier to obtain a FISA court warrant to monitor an individual formerly associated with Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Here are seven key problems with the claims made inside the Democrats’ rebuttal memo.

1 – The House Democratic rebuttal opens with a seemingly deceptive statement that Steele’s dossier “did not inform” the FBI’s decision to start its investigation into Trump’s campaign in late July.

This is the first contention in the rebuttal, which relates it is trying to “correct the record.” However, the Republican memo did not assert that the dossier informed the FBI’s decision to launch its investigation in late July or anytime. Instead, the GOP memo documented that Steele’s dossier formed an “essential part” of the FISA court applications submitted by Obama-era federal agencies to monitor the communications of Carter Page, who briefly served as a volunteer foreign policy adviser to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.

Meanwhile, even though House Democrats seem to be rebutting a contention that was not made in the Republican memo, there are possible issues with the rebuttal’s claim that the FBI’s investigative team only received Steele’s “reporting” in mid-September, ostensibly referring to the written dossier.  The Democrats entirely ignore that last July, Steele reportedly traveled to Rome, where he met with an FBI contact to supply the agency with alleged information he found during the course of his anti-Trump work.  The Washington Post reported that Steele met with the FBI on July 5, 2016.  The Democratic memo reveals that the DOJ “accurately informed the court that that the FBI initiated its counterintelligence investigation on July 31, 2016.”  That is 26 days after Steele met with the FBI in Rome.

2 – While perhaps not intending to, the Democratic memo actually confirms that the Obama Justice Department did use Steele’s largely discredited dossier for FISA court applications to monitor Page.

The memo contains a sentence stating that “as DOJ informed the court in subsequent renewals”; but the rest of that sentence is redacted. The next sentence states that “Steele’s reporting about Page’s Moscow meeting,” with the remainder of that sentence also redacted. The next sentence states that “DOJ’s applications did not otherwise rely on Steele’s reporting, including any ‘salacious’ allegations about Trump…” The word “otherwise” indicates that, according to the Democratic memo, DOJ did indeed rely on Steele’s dossier for something.

As a side note, interestingly, the Democrats only use the term “salacious” regarding the dossier, not fully quoting from former FBI Director James Comey’s famous remarks in which he testified that the anti-Trump dossier contained “salacious and unverified” material.

Meanwhile, the Democratic rebuttal goes on to cite specific instances of the FISA applications utilizing Steele’s dossier, with the applications citing Steele’s alleged sources reporting that Page took meetings in Russia.

In a clear attempt to minimize the importance of the dossier, the Democratic memo refers to a 2013 case in which Russian agents allegedly targeted Page for recruitment. In that case, Page was identified in court documents made public as “Male-1” in reference to a case involving three Russian men identified as Russian intelligence agents. The spy ring was accused of seeking information on U.S. sanctions as well as methods of developing alternate sources of energy. The FBI court filings describe “the attempted use of Male-1 as an intelligence source for Russia,” but Page was not accused of having been successfully recruited or spying. The court documents cite no evidence that “Male-1” knew he was talking with alleged Russian agents. That the Obama-era federal agencies needed to still use the dossier in light of that 2013 case may show that the 2013 episode was not enough to obtain a FISA warrant on Page. Steele’s dossier contains claims of updated meetings between Page and Russians that went into the year 2016.

Read More @ Breitbart.com

“Loaded For Guccifer” Aims For A Romanian Guccifer 2.0

0

by Adam Carter, Disobedient Media:

Introducing “Loaded For Guccifer”

During the past 2 weeks a wordpress blog titled “Loaded For Guccifer” appeared, attributing the infamous “Guccifer 2.0” persona (that claimed to hack the Democratic National Committee in 2016) to the owner of the company “THC Servers” (one of the service providers for DCLeaks, a web site that featured leaks briefly in the Summer 2016).

So far, the analysis has been mixed, by which I mean there has been some good detailed analysis that expands on what we know about Guccifer 2.0’s first batch of documents released but there have been a few apparent missteps made in several other parts of the analysis. This article documents an effort to scrutinize each article published so far and attempts to validate the information provided by this new site.

It’s important to point out that much of this review was written within a week of the Loaded For Guccifer blog going live, that it’s probably fair to say it’s a work in progress and that the author of the site has already responded to feedback and made adjustments, etc. (You’ll find some parts covered below are only available via the archived links now), so some disagreement and criticism here will have effectively become redundant since I started writing this.

Also, the author of the blog made some significant discoveries, finding things that were never mentioned by any cyber security firms or experts that investigated Guccifer 2.0 over the past 20 months. So, please don’t let any criticism (of initial misinterpretations) discourage you from checking out the latest analysis/discoveries there.

 

The All Important Timeline

Link | Archived

This page contains a lot of factual information covering several topics. While this presents a lot of information that is verifiable, it also covers a broader array (covering topics of a conspiratorial nature) than what is needed for investigating Guccifer 2.0.

While there is little to criticize here it should be noted that::

  • CrowdStrike were at the DNC much earlier than implied as they carried out an investigation into the NGP-VAN breach carried out by Josh Uretsky, they were still working with the DNC in April (it’s assumed this was in relation to the NGP-VAN breach but that investigation was only supposed to last 5 weeks and was agreed upon back in December) and they were then called in again immediately (while only having just been working with the DNC) in order to investigate a breach. – It’s almost as if some incident had required CrowdStrike to extend their working relationship with the DNC’s leadership resulting in them still being involved 16 weeks after their 5-week investigation was first agreed upon)
  • Guccifer 2.0’s blatantly anomalous Russian/French follower (one his first few followers and one that seems to have an odd conflict of identity matching the 2 different pieces of infrastructure Guccifer 2.0 used when he first appeared, a Russian VPN company with a server in France) was created in April, 2016, so, early planning for the Guccifer 2.0 persona could have occurred in April or sooner, it may even have initially been intended in anticipation of Podesta’s emails being leaked (and would explain why Guccifer 2.0’s first batch of files consisted of deliberately altered versions of files that were attachments to Podesta’s emails).
  • While many seeing the timeline graphic will notice that the WikiLeaks emails (or at least spike in daily frequency) starts at the same time as the registration for DCLeaks (April 19, 2016), it’s important to note that this isn’t a causative correlation, it’s purely coincidental. The reason for the overlap on that date is actually caused by the DNC’s 30-day email retention policy (as confirmed by Debbie Wasserman-Shultz’s chief of staff Tracie Pough) and when the emails first started being acquired in May.

As the timeline article is generally all factual and the information can be verified and sources confirmed, we’ll move on to some of the assertions regarding Guccifer 2.0, Catalin Florica & THCServers…

Say “Hi” To Guccifer 2.0

Link | Archived

At the start of the article, we have some bullet points, these are:

The article doesn’t show that Catalin Florica, specifically, registered those domains any more than other domains registered through THC Servers. A copy of numerous historical WhoIs records relating to DCLeaks shows it had the registrar’s privacy protected in 2015 and in 2016 (after the domain registration had been allowed to expire) it was registered again with privacy protected through a different provider and different privacy service.

Florica’s company, involved in providing services to those seeking to retain their anonymity, certainly has been tied to provision of service to some nefarious sites, however, these have nothing to do with Guccifer 2.0 and Florica’s culpability beyond being that of a service provider isn’t demonstrated in the article.

Endurance Group International, the partner company referenced, is one of the biggest Internet hosting service providers, it’s based in the US and has many subsidiaries due to all the businesses they’ve acquired. While it’s possible to see that Endurance group provided service to the site 4-5 years prior to THC Servers, there’s nothing showing how this was registered by Florica/THC Servers originally (at least from the WhoIs data linked to above and available through various WhoIs history providers linked to later in this article).

Read More @ DisobedientMedia.com

The FBI Lied And 17 People Died

0

by Karl Denninger, Market Ticker:

Want to direct anger at guns and the NRA?

Go **** yourself.

Start by dismantling the lying FBI.

On September 15, 2017, FBI received and investigated a tip about a threatening comment posted to a YouTube video.

  • Prior to the shooting, the FBI did not seek information from Google, Inc., YouTube’s parent company, to ascertain the identity of the individual behind the comment or his location.

  • The FBI opened a counterterrorism lead as a result of the September 2017 tip.

  • The FBI closed the lead on October 11, 2017, because it didn’t positively identify the individual behind the post.

  • After the shooting, the FBI requested further information from Google and confirmed that the comment was posted by Nikolas Cruz.

The FBI said they couldn’t figure out who posted the comment.

That was a lie.

They never asked Google (Youtube’s parent company) for the information and, as I pointed out immediately after the event, if they had they would have immediately learned where the post came from and, since Cruz posted it using his own name, trivially identified him.

Now we have proof from Senator Grassley that they lied to the American Public — again.

As a direct result of their failure to do their job 17 people are dead.

Further, they attempted to obstruct determining their culpability by lying about being “unable” to find the person responsible.  In fact they never tried to do so; that’s not inability, it’s a choice.

To those in Broward Couny and elsewhere who are still worshiping cops and claiming the NRA and gun owners are villains and to be shunned: I’m done with all of you and every thinking American needs to be done with you.

Done forever.

You want boycotts, I got boycotts.

No more business done with any firm in Broward County.

No more hiring or consideration for hiring, nor existing employment, within or by anyone who resides or works in Broward County.

No more tourism dollars of mine will be spent in Broward County.

Any firm that takes action to void deals with the NRA or any other organization or person as a consequence of the pressure brought predicated upon these deaths that occurred as a direct result of the willful and intentional misconduct of these agencies will be permanently added to that list.  Today that includes Wyndham, Symantec, Hertz, Enterprise Rent-a-Car, Chubb, Metlife, North American Van Lines, Delta and United Airlines.  I am happy to add liberally to this list.

I happen to disagree strongly with many of the NRA’s views (they spam me anyway) but I will not do business with firms that act against another organization when the underlying event was had no proximate attachment to the attacked organization but did have attachment to multiple federal, state and local agencies, all of whom did not do their jobs.  I consider such an attack to be proof of intent to act in a dishonest manner in the conduct of their business and thus must fully expect any such firm to screw me.

All of this will continue until I die.

Read More @ Market-Ticket.org

What The Democrats Left Out Of Their Memo

0

by Peter Hasson, Daily Caller:

Democrats on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence omitted several key facts from their memo on the FBI and Justice Department’s use of the Trump-Russia dossier in applying for a spy warrant on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page in 2016.

The Democrats’ memo, released on Saturday, claimed to refute a similar memo released on Feb. 2 by committee Republicans who alleged that the FBI and DOJ had abused the FISA system in obtaining the warrant. The Democratic memo omitted several key points.

The Democratic memo ignored Republicans’ contention that former FBI Deputy Director Andy McCabe testified in December that the FISA warrant would never have been granted without the infamous dossier, which was commissioned by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). McCabe’s testimony was a key point in the Republican memo.

Democratic California Rep. Eric Swalwell claimed earlier this month that Republicans had mischaracterized McCabe’s testimony. However, Democrats declined to directly refute that claim in their own memo.

Republicans noted several other omissions in their rebuttal to the Democratic memo.

“The Democrat memo ignores the fact that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton campaign paid for the Steele dossier, which— as confirmed by the Graham-Grassley referral —formed “a significant portion of the Carter Page FISA application,” the Republican rebuttal states.

“Amazingly, the Democrat memo does not contain a single reference to the DNC or Clinton campaign, or acknowledge that they funded the dossier, or admit that this information was not provided to the FISA Court.”

“The Democrat memo confirms that a September 2016 Yahoo News article by Michael Isikoff was part of the FISA application. However, the memo ignores the fact that the FBI failed to subsequently inform the Court that Steele provided information to Yahoo News,” the GOP rebuttal adds. “Isikoff has publicly confirmed Steele was a source for his article about Page.”

Republicans claim the Democratic memo also “paints an incomplete picture of Page’s past activities, and omits that, in a secretly-taped statement reproduced in a 2015 federal court filing, a Russian intelligence officer called Page “an idiot.”

Read More @ DailyCaller.com

Nicole Kidman: ‘Stanley Kubrick Said Pedophiles Run The World’

0

from Top Buzz:

Stanley Kubrick claimed that “the world is run by pedophiles”, according to Nicole Kidman, who says the reclusive director taught her “how the world works and who is really in control behind the scenes” while filming Eyes Wide Shut.

“Stanley told me the world is run by pedophiles,” Nicole Kidman said while promoting HBO’s Big Little Lies, in Los Angeles. “He studied secret societies his whole life, he was fascinated by them, and he said the elite, the top secret societies, they are full of men with a certain predilection. They are tied together, sort of bonded, by pedophilia.

“They all know each other’s dark secrets. There is no way out for any of them. It’s a lifetime bond. Even if one of them wanted to go straight, repent, so to speak, he can’t. His peers will bring him down. They are in it until death, driving the world to ruin. That’s kind of how Stanley explained it but it was all very complex. I’m probably not doing it justice.”

The 1999 film, starring Kidman and her then husband Tom Cruise, was Stanley Kubrick’s last outing as director before his death the same year. Many people believe Kubrick gave away too many secrets in the film about secret societies and the global elite, and it may have cost him his life.

Asked if Kubrick’s knowledge of secret societies and their darkest secrets had anything to do with his death, Kidman raised an eyebrow and said “That’s not a question I can answer here.”

“Though maybe I could. None of you in the media would be allowed to print it, would you? The men who own your companies wouldn’t allow it to get out,” Kidman said.

A brave speaker of truth, Nicole Kidman had contracts cancelled by two Hollywood studios earlier this year after she dared go against the current Hollywood agenda by saying “we need to support whoever is the president”.

By daring to speak about the possible reasons for Stanley Kubrick’s death she is now running the risk of further attacks.

While she was not willing to comment on the cause of Kubrick’s death, Kidman was willing to say that the reclusive director was not expecting death to come so soon.

“Stanley’s next film was going to be about psychopathic pedophiles. He said he was going deeper down the rabbit hole.”

“He always had four of five projects ready to go. He was a meticulous researcher. He believed the most powerful films always have a hard grounding in truth.”

Read More @ TopBuzz.com

Lawyers For The DNC Argue That Primary Rigging Is Protected By The First Amendment

0

by Elizabeth Vos, Disobedient Media:

The ongoing litigation of the DNC Fraud Lawsuit and the appeal regarding its dismissal took a stunning turn yesterday. The defendants in the case, including the DNC and former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, filed a response brief that left many observers of the case at a loss for words.

The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

The Defense counsel also argued that because of Jared Beck’s outspoken twitter posts, the plaintiffs were using the litigation process for political purposes: “For example, Plaintiffs’ counsel Jared Beck repeatedly refers to the DNC as “shi*bags” on Twitter and uses other degrading language in reference to Defendants.” Fascinatingly, no mention is made regarding the importance of First Amendment at this point in the document.

The defense counsel also took issue with Jared Beck for what they termed as: “…Repeatedly promoted patently false and deeply offensive conspiracy theories about the deaths of a former DNC staffer and Plaintiffs’ process server in an attempt to bolster attention for this lawsuit.”

This author was shocked to find that despite the characterization of the Becks as peddlers of conspiracy theory, the defense counsel failed to mention the motion for protection filed by the Becks earlier in the litigation process. They also failed to note the voice-modulated phone calls received by the law offices of the Becks which contained a caller-ID corresponding to the law offices of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a defendant in the case. In light of this context, the Becks hardly appear to be peddlers of conspiracy theory.

The DNC defense lawyers then argued that: There is no legitimate basis for this litigation, which is, at its most basic, an improper attempt to forge the federal courts into a political weapon to be used by individuals who are unhappy with how a political party selected its candidate in a presidential campaign.”

The brief continued: “…To recognize any of the causes of action that Plaintiffs allege based on their animating theory would run directly contrary to long-standing Supreme Court precedent recognizing the central and critical First Amendment rights enjoyed by political parties, especially when it comes to selecting the party’s nominee for public office.

It appears that the defendants in the DNC Fraud Lawsuit are attempting to argue that cheating a candidate in the primary process is protected under the first amendment.

If all that weren’t enough, DNC representatives argued that the Democratic National Committee had no established fiduciary duty “to the Plaintiffs or the classes of donors and registered voters they seek to represent.”

Read More @ DisobedientMedia.com

CHRISTIANITY AND THE TRUTH MOVEMENT: HOW MUCH DO THEY COINCIDE?

by James Perloff, James Perloff.com:

Note: By the “Truth Movement,” I refer to those proactive people who do not reflexively accept what is reported by mainstream media, more than 90 percent of which is owned today by just six corporations. “Truthers” seek to “live outside the Matrix” and logically determine the realities that so often hide behind headlines. To achieve this, they have established their own presence as “alternative media,” using platforms such as blogs, independent radio, YouTube channels, Twitter accounts, etc. The Truth Movement has long existed (I myself began writing for alt media in 1985), but it experienced explosive growth after the government’s official explanation for 9/11 (as well as for the Middle East wars which followed) began to unravel. Truthers don’t always agree with each other, and make mistakes, but most of their errors are honest ones—which are bound to occur in the course of investigations—rather than deliberate lies prompted by corporate salaries or political agendas. Although the Truth Movement has been infiltrated by intelligence services, and the word “Truther” carries negative connotations for some, I am using it here in its most ideal sense: a person seeking only the truth.

Sometimes I’m asked questions along these lines:

“I noticed you were on X’s podcast. How come X isn’t a Christian and, for that matter, doesn’t even express any kind of spirituality? How can X see all the evils of the New World Order and not get depressed, when X doesn’t even seem to have the hope that comes from a relationship with God?”

I know many Truthers, and while I would say that a majority are Christians (of various denominations), there are also some Muslims, some agnostics, some New Agers, and within the mix a few people who are outright hostile to Christianity.

When I was hippie (about 1970), there was a general awareness among hippies and socialists that a wealthy elite pretty much ran America. We called it “the Establishment” or “the Man,” but we were far behind on the learning curve. We had never heard of the Council on Foreign Relations or Bilderbergers, knew nothing of how the Federal Reserve operated, the role that Zionism played—or, for that matter, that the CIA was behind LSD and our own counter-culture movement.

In our narrow understanding, only one thing motivated the Establishment: lust for money. We viewed geopolitics through the materialist Marxist lens: wealthy capitalists were exploiting the poor and working classes in order to increase their own riches. There is, of course, a substantial measure of truth to this. The New World Order’s oligarchs offer the perks of fiat-generated wealth as incentives for the human cogs who run their system, and today we correctly speak of the “one percent” and ever-widening gap between rich and poor.

But it never dawned on us hippies that ultimately there was a Luciferian component. And why would it? Most of us were God-rejecting agnostics. (Who ever heard of a God-fearing hippie or Marxist?) After all, wasn’t religion “the opiate of the masses”? If there was no God, there was obviously no Lucifer either. Fancying ourselves scientific, we had tossed God and Lucifer into the “myth” corral where Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy reside.

However, with the Internet’s acceleration of information, it has become progressively clearer that the “New World Order” (NWO) is not simply materialistic; it is Luciferian. We can see it in the ceremonies at Bohemian Grove in Northern California, where America’s elite have long gathered annually. The rituals there include dressing en masse in gothic, hooded robes and sacrificing a human being in effigy (or is it for real?) before a forty-foot tall concrete owl representing the Canaanite god Moloch. Alex Jones broke through the Grove’s tight security to videotape the bizarre nighttime ceremony. Bohemian Grove participants have included the Bushes, Bill Clinton, Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, Henry Kissinger, top Bechtel executives, and many other “notables.”

For those with time to watch it (40 minutes), this landmark interview with Dutch whistleblower Ronald Bernard, a former currency manipulator, mentions the lethal satanic rituals the global elite engage in (it is best watched in full-screen mode to read the subtitles; some may prefer a version with an English voice-over:

Read More @ JamesPerloff.com

GOLD DOWN $1.15 TO $1328.80/SILVER DOWN 10 CENTS TO $16.52

by Harvey Organ, Harvey Organ Blog:

GOLD EFP ISSUANCE: 2746 CONTRACTS/SILVER EFP ISSUANCE 1755 CONTRACTS/GOLD HAS NOW STARTED TO MOVE BACK INTO GLD: TODAY WITH GOLD DOWN $1.15 WE HAD AN ADDITION OF 1.47 TONNES/IN THE SLV: WITH SILVER DOWN 10 CENTS, WE HAD 1.315 MILLION OZ ADDED/ IN CHINA, ONE OF THE BIGGEST CONGLOMERATES HAS BEEN TAKEN OVER BY THE GOVERNMENT AS THERE ARE SYSTEMIC RISKS DUE TO ITS HIGH DEBT/TURKEY THREATENS A CYPRIOT OIL TANKER IN CYPRIOT WATERS AS TENSIONS RIS

GOLD: $1328.80 down $1.15

Silver: $16.52 DOWN 10 cents

Closing access prices:

Gold $1329.10

silver: $16.53

SHANGHAI GOLD FIX: FIRST FIX 10 15 PM EST (2:15 SHANGHAI LOCAL TIME)

SECOND FIX: 2:15 AM EST (6:15 SHANGHAI LOCAL TIME)

SHANGHAI FIRST GOLD FIX: $1335.15 DOLLARS PER OZ

NY PRICE OF GOLD AT EXACT SAME TIME: $1328.80

PREMIUM FIRST FIX: $6.35

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

SECOND SHANGHAI GOLD FIX: $1337.63

NY GOLD PRICE AT THE EXACT SAME TIME: $1326.90

discount of Shanghai 2nd fix/NY:$10.73

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

LONDON FIRST GOLD FIX: 5:30 am est $1328.90

NY PRICING AT THE EXACT SAME TIME: $1329.10

LONDON SECOND GOLD FIX 10 AM: $1328.90

NY PRICING AT THE EXACT SAME TIME. $1328.10

For comex gold:

FEBRUARY/

NUMBER OF NOTICES FILED TODAY FOR FEBRUARY CONTRACT: 16 NOTICE(S) FOR 1600 OZ.

TOTAL NOTICES SO FAR:1800 FOR 180,000 OZ (5.5980 TONNES),

For silver:

FEBRUARY

1 NOTICE(S) FILED TODAY FOR

5000 OZ/

Total number of notices filed so far this month: 387 for 1,935,000 oz

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Bitcoin: BID $10,162/OFFER $10,233: UP $362(morning)

Bitcoin: BID/ $9,932/offer $10,002: DOWN $132  (CLOSING/5 PM)

 

end

Let us have a look at the data for today\

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In silver, the total open interest FELL BY A CONSIDERABLE SIZED 3176 contracts from 201,946  FALLING TO 198,429 DESPITE  YESTERDAY’S TINY 1 CENT LOSS IN SILVER PRICING.  WE HAD CONSIDERABLE COMEX LIQUIDATION. HOWEVER, WE WERE AGAIN NOTIFIED THAT WE HAD ANOTHER FAIR SIZED NUMBER OF COMEX LONGS TRANSFERRING THEIR CONTRACTS TO LONDON THROUGH THE EFP ROUTE:  1255 EFP’S FOR MARCH AND AND 500 EFP’S FOR MAY AND ZERO FOR ALL  OTHER MONTHS  AND THUS TOTAL ISSUANCE OF 1199 CONTRACTS.  WITH THE TRANSFER OF 1755 CONTRACTS, WHAT THE CME IS STATING IS THAT THERE IS NO SILVER (OR GOLD) TO BE DELIVERED UPON AT THE COMEX AS THEY MUST EXPORT THEIR OBLIGATION TO LONDON. ALSO KEEP IN MIND THAT THERE CAN BE A DELAY OF 24 HRS IN THE ISSUING OF EFP’S. THE 1755 CONTRACTS TRANSLATES INTO 8.755 MILLION OZ DESPITE  WITH THE CONTINUAL DROP IN OPEN INTEREST IN SILVER AT THE COMEX.

ACCUMULATION FOR EFP’S/SILVER/J.P.MORGAN’S HOUSE OF BRIBES, / STARTING FROM FIRST DAY NOTICE/FOR MONTH OF FEBRUARY:

43,223 CONTRACTS (FOR 17 TRADING DAYS TOTAL 43,223 CONTRACTS OR 216.115 MILLION OZ: AVERAGE PER DAY: 2543 CONTRACTS OR 12.712 MILLION OZ/DAY

TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA AS TO THE HUGE SUPPLY THIS MONTH IN SILVER:  SO FAR THIS MONTH:  216.115 MILLION PAPER OZ HAVE MORPHED OVER TO LONDON. THIS REPRESENTS AROUND 30.85% OF ANNUAL GLOBAL PRODUCTION

ACCUMULATION IN YEAR 2018 TO DATE SILVER EFP’S:  464.65 MILLION OZ.

ACCUMULATION FOR JAN 2018: 236.879 MILLION OZ

RESULT: A CONSIDERABLE SIZED LOSS IN OI SILVER COMEX DESPITE THE TINY 1 CENT LOSS IN SILVER PRICE.  WE ALSO HAD A GOOD SIZED EFP ISSUANCE OF 1755 CONTRACTS WHICH EXITED OUT OF THE SILVER COMEX AND TRANSFERRED THEIR OI TO LONDON AS FORWARDS. SPECULATORS CONTINUED THEIR INTEREST IN ATTACKING THE SILVER COMEX FOR PHYSICAL SILVER . FROM THE CME DATA 1755 EFP’S  FOR  MONTHS MARCH AND MAY WERE ISSUED FOR TODAY  FOR A DELIVERABLE FORWARD CONTRACT OVER IN LONDON WITH A FIAT BONUS.   WE LOST  1421 OICONTRACTS i.e. 1755 open interest contracts headed for London (EFP’s) TOGETHER WITH A DECREASE OF 3176  OI COMEX CONTRACTS. AND ALL OF THIS HAPPENED WITH THE FALL IN PRICE OF SILVER OF 1 CENT AND A CLOSING PRICE OF $16.62 WITH RESPECT TO YESTERDAY’S TRADING. YET WE STILL HAVE A FAIR AMOUNT OF SILVER STANDING AT THE COMEX.

In ounces AT THE COMEX, the OI is still represented by just UNDER 1 BILLION oz i.e. 0.992 BILLION TO BE EXACT or 142% of annual global silver production (ex Russia & ex China).

FOR THE NEW FRONT FEBRUARY MONTH/ THEY FILED: 0 NOTICE(S) FOR NIL OZ OF SILVER

In gold, the open interest  ROSE BY 0 CONTRACTS REMAINING AT 524,449 DESPITE THE TINY RISE IN PRICE OF GOLD WITH YESTERDAY’S TRADING ($0.90). HOWEVER, IN ANOTHER DEVELOPMENT, WE RECEIVED THE TOTAL NUMBER OF GOLD EFP’S ISSUED FOR FRIDAY AND IT TOTALED AN SMALL SIZED  2746 CONTRACTS OF WHICH  APRIL SAW THE ISSUANCE OF 2746 CONTRACTS AND  JUNE SAW THE ISSUANCE OF 0 CONTRACTS AND THEN ALL OTHER MONTHS ZERO.    The new OI for the gold complex rests at 524,449. ALSO REMEMBER THAT THERE WILL BE A DELAY IN THE ISSUANCE OF EFP’S.  THE BANKERS REMOVE LONG POSITIONS OF COMEX GOLD IMMEDIATELY.  THEN THEY ORCHESTRATE THEIR PRIVATE EFP DEAL WITH THE LONGS AND THAT COULD TAKE AN ADDITIONAL 48 HRS SO WE GENERALLY DO NOT GET A MATCH WITH RESPECT TO DEPARTING COMEX LONGS AND NEW EFP LONG TRANSFERS. DEMAND FOR GOLD INTENSIFIES GREATLY AS WE CONTINUE TO WITNESS A HUGE NUMBER OF EFP TRANSFERS TOGETHER WITH THE MASSIVE INCREASE IN GOLD COMEX OI  TOGETHER WITH  THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF GOLD OUNCES STANDING FOR FEBRUARY COMEX. EVEN THOUGH THE BANKERS ISSUED THESE MONSTROUS EFPS, THE OBLIGATION STILL RESTS WITH THE BANKERS TO SUPPLY METAL BUT IT TRANSFERS THE RISK TO A LONDON BANKER OBLIGATION AND NOT A NEW YORK COMEX OBLIGATION. LONGS RECEIVE A FIAT BONUS TOGETHER WITH A LONG LONDON FORWARD. THUS, BY THESE ACTIONS, THE BANKERS AT THE COMEX HAVE JUST STATED THAT THEY HAVE NO APPRECIABLE METAL!! THIS IS A MASSIVE FRAUD: THEY CANNOT SUPPLY ANY METAL TO OUR COMEX LONGS BUT THEY ARE QUITE WILLING TO SUPPLY MASSIVE NON BACKED GOLD (AND SILVER) PAPER KNOWING THAT THEY HAVE NO METAL TO SATISFY OUR LONGS. LONDON IS NOW SEVERELY BACKWARD IN BOTH GOLD AND SILVER (BIG RISE IN BOTH GOFO AND SIFO) AND WE ARE WITNESSING DELAYS IN ACTUAL DELIVERIES. IN ESSENCE TODAY DESPITE YESTERDAY’S TRADING IN GOLD,  WE HAVE A GAIN OF 2746  CONTRACTS: 0 OI CONTRACTS INCREASED AT THE COMEX AND A SMALL SIZED  2746 OI CONTRACTS WHICH NAVIGATED OVER TO LONDON.(2746 oi gain in CONTRACTS EQUATES TO 8.541TONNES)

YESTERDAY, WE HAD 9751 EFP’S ISSUED.

ACCUMULATION OF EFP’S GOLD AT J.P. MORGAN’S HOUSE OF BRIBES: (EXCHANGE FOR PHYSICAL) FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY STARTING WITH FIRST DAY NOTICE: 184,719 CONTRACTS OR 18,471,900  OZ OR 574.52 TONNES (17 TRADING DAYS AND THUS AVERAGING: 10,865EFP CONTRACTS PER TRADING DAY OR 1,086,500 OZ/ TRADING DAY)

TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA AS TO THE HUGE SIZE OF THESE EFP TRANSFERS :   SO FAR THIS MONTH IN 17 TRADING DAYS: IN  TONNES: 574.52 TONNES

TOTAL ANNUAL GOLD PRODUCTION, 2017, THROUGHOUT THE WORLD EX CHINA EX RUSSIA: 2200 TONNES

THUS EFP TRANSFERS REPRESENTS 574.52/2200 x 100% TONNES =  26.11% OF GLOBAL ANNUAL PRODUCTION SO FAR IN FEBRUARY ALONE.

ACCUMULATION OF GOLD EFP’S YEAR 2018 TO DATE:  1207.94 TONNES

ACCUMULATION OF GOLD EFP’S FOR JANUARY 2018: 653.22  TONNES

Result: A  ZERO SIZED INCREASE IN OI AT THE COMEX DESPITE THE TINY RISE IN PRICE IN GOLD TRADING YESTERDAY ($0.90).  HOWEVER, WE HAD ANOTHER TINY SIZED NUMBER OF COMEX LONG TRANSFERRING TO LONDON THROUGH THE EFP ROUTE: 2746 CONTRACTS AS THESE HAVE ALREADY BEEN NEGOTIATED AND CONFIRMED.   THERE OBVIOUSLY DOES NOT SEEM TO BE MUCH PHYSICAL GOLD AT THE COMEX AND YET WE ALSO OBSERVED A HUGE DELIVERY MONTH FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER. I GUESS IT EXPLAINS THE HUGE ISSUANCE OF EFP’S…THERE IS HARDLY ANY GOLD PRESENT AT THE GOLD COMEX FOR DELIVERY PURPOSES. IF YOU TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE 2746 EFPCONTRACTS ISSUED, WE HAD A NET GAIN IN OPEN INTEREST OF 2746 contracts ON THE TWO EXCHANGES:

2746 CONTRACTS MOVE TO LONDON AND  0 CONTRACTS INCREASED AT THE COMEX. (in tonnes, the GAIN in total oi equates to 8.54 TONNES).

we had: 16 notice(s) filed upon for 1600 oz of gold.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

With respect to our two criminal funds, the GLD and the SLV:

GLD

WITH GOLD DOWN $1.15 : A BIG CHANGE IN GOLD INVENTORY AT THE GLD/ANOTHER DEPOSIT OF 1.47 TONNES OF GOLD INTO THE GLD

Inventory rests tonight: 829.26 tonnes.

SLV/

WITH SILVER DOWN 10 CENTs TODAY: 

ANOTHER BIG CHANGES IN SILVER INVENTORY AT THE SLV/A DEPOSIT OF 1.315 MILLION OZ

/INVENTORY RESTS AT 316.590 MILLION OZ/

end

First, here is an outline of what will be discussed tonight:

1. Today, we had the open interest in silver FELL BY 3176  contracts from 201,946 DOWN TO 198,429 (AND now A LITTLE FURTHER FROM THE NEW COMEX RECORD SET ON FRIDAY/APRIL 21/2017 AT 234,787) DESPITE  THE TINY SIZED FALL  IN PRICE OF SILVER  (1 CENT WITH RESPECT TO  YESTERDAY’S TRADING).   OUR BANKERS USED THEIR EMERGENCY PROCEDURE TO ISSUE ANOTHER GOOD 1255 PRIVATE EFP’S FOR MARCH AND 500 EFP CONTRACTS OR MAY  (WE DO NOT GET A LOOK AT THESE CONTRACTS AS IT IS PRIVATE BUT THE CFTC DOES AUDIT THEM) AND 0 EFP’S FOR ALL OTHER MONTHS .  EFP’S GIVE OUR COMEX LONGS A FIAT BONUS PLUS A DELIVERABLE PRODUCT OVER IN LONDON. WE HAD CONSIDERABLE COMEX SILVER COMEX LIQUIDATION. IF WE TAKE THE  OI LOSS AT THE COMEX OF  3176 CONTRACTS TO THE 1755 OI TRANSFERRED TO LONDON THROUGH EFP’S, WE OBTAIN A SMALL LOSS OF 1421  OPEN INTEREST CONTRACTS .  WE STILL HAVE A GOOD AMOUNT OF SILVER OUNCES THAT ARE STANDING FOR METAL IN FEBRUARY (SEE BELOW). THE NET LOSS TODAY IN OZ ON THE TWO EXCHANGES:  7.105 MILLION OZ!!!

RESULT: A CONSIDERABLE SIZED DECREASE IN SILVER OI AT THE COMEX DESPITE THE TINY  FALL OF 1 CENT IN PRICE (WITH RESPECT TO YESTERDAY’S TRADING ). BUT WE ALSO HAD ANOTHER GOOD 1755 EFP’S ISSUED TRANSFERRING COMEX LONGS OVER TO LONDON. TOGETHER WITH THE GOOD  SIZED AMOUNT OF SILVER OUNCES STANDING FOR FEBRUARY, DEMAND FOR PHYSICAL SILVER INTENSIFIES AS WE WITNESS MAJOR BANK SHORT COVERING ACCOMPANIED BY INCREASES IN GOFO AND SIFO RATES INDICATING SCARCITY.

(report Harvey)

.

2.a) The Shanghai and London gold fix report

(Harvey)

2 b) Gold/silver trading overnight Europe, Goldcore

(Mark O’Byrne/zerohedge

and in NY: Bloomberg

3. ASIAN AFFAIRS

i)Late THURSDAY night/FRIDAY morning: Shanghai closed UP 20.46 POINTS OR 0.63% /Hang Sang CLOSED UP 311.49 POINTS OR 0.97% / The Nikkei closed UP 156.37 POINTS OR 0.72%/Australia’s all ordinaires CLOSED UP 0.78%/Chinese yuan (ONSHORE) closed UP at 6.3350/Oil UP to 62.60 dollars per barrel for WTI and 66.28 for Brent. Stocks in Europe OPENED DEEPLY IN THE RED EXCEPT GERMAN DAX  .   ONSHORE YUAN CLOSED 6.3350 AGAINST THE DOLLAR. OFFSHORE YUAN CLOSED AT 6.3310 AGAINST  THE DOLLAR/ONSHORE YUAN TRADING WEAKER AGAINST OFFSHORE YUAN/ONSHORE YUAN TRADING STRONGER AGAINST USA DOLLAR/ONSHORE YUAN TRADING MUCH STRONGER AGAINST THE DOLLAR AND ALL CURRENCIES. CHINA IS NOT SO HAPPY TODAY 

Read More @ HarveyOrganBlog.com

WikiLeaks Private Messages About ‘Sadistic Sociopath’ Hillary Leaked

0

by James Barret, Daily Wire:

Leading up to the 2016 election, Julian Assange made no bones publicly about his opposition to Hillary Clinton, so to find out in private messages just leaked to The Intercept that he believed her presidency would be far worse than a Republican presidency is unsurprising. That said, some of the leaked “low securitychannel” messages between Assange and various WikiLeaks’ key online boosters contain some juicy quotes about Clinton, as well as an unfiltered insight into Assange’s approach to the 2016 election.

Leading up to the 2016 election, Julian Assange made no bones publicly about his opposition to Hillary Clinton, so to find out in private messages just leaked to The Intercept that he believed her presidency would be far worse than a Republican presidency is unsurprising. That said, some of the leaked “low security channel” messages between Assange and various WikiLeaks’ key online boosters contain some juicy quotes about Clinton, as well as an unfiltered insight into Assange’s approach to the 2016 election.

Assange’s WikiLeaks played a significant role in the 2016 election by leaking politically-damaging internal emails from the Democratic Party and Clinton allies. In the WikiLeaks chats shared with The Intercept, some of Assange’s motives for his campaign against Clinton are spelled out in black and white.

“We believe it would be much better for GOP to win,” he wrote on November 19, 2015, in a private Twitter direct message with the group of high-level supporters. “Dems+Media+liberals woudl then form a block to reign in their worst qualities. With Hillary in charge, GOP will be pushing for her worst qualities., dems+media+neoliberals will be mute.”

Two minutes later, he added his most scathing criticism of Clinton: “She’s a bright, well connected, sadistic sociopath.”

Assange made clear that rather than supporting Republicans, he stood in opposition to a Democratic stranglehold on the government, the power of which the media would fail to adequately check. That unchecked power, particularly in the hands of a “hawkish” Clinton, he suggested, is more likely to lead to “start[ing] wars.”

Read More @ DailyWire.com

With America’s help, Saudi Arabia is moving to become a nuclear power

by Alex Christoforou, The Duran:

US may open path for Saudi Arabia to acquire nuclear weapons.

Saudi Arabia may very well the next Middle East country with nuclear power.

The Kingdom is set to strike a deal with the United States for the purchase of nuclear reactors, despite concerns over Saudi refusal to accept restrictions against the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Via The Middle East Monitor

Crown Prince Mohamed Bin Salman, who is the de facto ruler of the country, has ambitious plans to diversify the country’s energy source and is in the market to purchase nuclear power reactors. The potential for lucrative deals is too good to be missed and the Trump administration is thought to be mulling over loosening US law to win Saudi contracts, worth billions. The Kingdom has refused to be bound by stringent US regulations that restrict reprocessing and enriching uranium for the production of nuclear weapons.

With competitors like Russia and China waiting in the wings, Trump is keen to strike a deal with the Saudi’s and breathe new life into the American nuclear industry.

Finalists to build nuclear power stations along the Kingdom’s desolate Arabian Gulf strip will be announced in the coming months, but it’s not certain if the US will be the one to strike the deal. Israel, despite having its own nuclear arsenal, is strongly opposed to any other country in the Middle East acquiring nuclear weapons and with alliances constantly shifting in the region it may try to derail any deal.

US policy also seeks to limit nuclear weapons proliferation especially in the Middle East but Trump may have no option other than to lower restrictions with Saudi Arabia.

Read More @ TheDuran.com

Oxfam GB Suspended From Working In Haiti Amid Sex Scandal Investigation

0

from Disobedient Media:

Haiti has suspended Oxfam Great Britain from operating in the country amid an investigation into the charity’s sex scandal.

The Caribbean nation’s government announced the UK arm of the charity has had its authorisation to work in Haiti revoked for at least two months over “serious failings” between 2010 and 2011.

Earlier this month, the charity was hit by allegations senior staff used prostitutes while part of an international response to Haiti’s devastating earthquake in 2010.

Aviol Fleurant, Haiti’s minister of planning and external cooperation, said the country is investigating whether anyone from Oxfam sexually abused minors.

It comes after a meeting between Oxfam bosses and the Haitian government on Thursday.

The charity had previously said it would hand over its full unredacted internal report into the 2011 scandal to Haitian ministers.

A Haitian government statement said: “These reprehensible acts, alleged crimes, acknowledged by the perpetrators as well as the NGO, are a serious violation of the dignity of the Haitian people.”

A final decision on Oxfam GB’s authorisation to work in Haiti will be made at a later date.

An Oxfam spokeswoman said the charity had vowed to co-operate with Haiti’s investigation and “apologised to the Haitian government and people for abuses by former staff that occurred in 2011”.

She added: “Oxfam is committed to putting in place a number of wide-sweeping initiatives to improve its global safeguarding policies and practices, including the establishment of an independent commission and putting more staff and resources into its safeguarding teams.”

Seven of Oxfam’s workers were sacked or resigned after the charity launched the internal investigation into allegations about the behaviour of staff in Haiti.

The charity’s country director in Haiti at the time of the scandal, who was among those to resign, has since branded much of what was alleged as “absolute nonsense”.

Senior figures at the charity have spoken of their shame over the claims, with Oxfam GB’s deputy chief executive Penny Lawrence resigning in the wake of the scandal.

The UK Government is also deciding whether to end Oxfam’s multi-million pound yearly funding, while the charity has said it will not bid for any new Government contracts at present.

On Monday, Oxfam published their final internal investigation from 2011 into allegations of sexual misconduct and other unacceptable behaviour in Haiti.

It came after the charity denied claims it had covered up the use of prostitutes by senior aid workers at the time, while it has also come under fire for not properly disclosing misconduct of former staff or preventing them being employed by other charities.

International Development Secretary Penny Mordaunt has suggested Oxfam may have “deliberately” misled over the Haiti allegations in order to try and protect their reputation.

The charity is investigating 26 cases of misconduct reported in the wake of the Haiti scandal.

It has also seen thousands of individuals cancel their regular donations.

Read More @ DisobedientMedia.com