Monday, August 19, 2019



The great flu vaccine hoax: new evidence

by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News:

Apparently, the powers-that-be want everyone to take the seasonal flu vaccine out of loyalty and blind faith. Because actual science reveals the hoax.

A new study, published in the PLOS Journal on 10/23, by contributing authors from the Scripps Institute and the University of Pennsylvania, is titled: “A structural explanation for the low effectiveness of the seasonal influenza H3N2 vaccine.”

Oops. Low effectiveness? The public has been taught to believe the vaccine is quite effective.

Here is a key quote from the study: “It is common to use chicken eggs for culturing clinical isolates and for large-scale production of vaccines. However, influenza virus often mutates to adapt to being grown in chicken eggs, which can influence antigenicity and hence vaccine effectiveness.”

Translation: The virus in the vaccine mutates, in the chicken eggs, and therefore the patient’s immune system responds to the wrong version of the flu virus.

Here is another quote: “Our study describes a mechanism [that explains]…the low influenza vaccine effectiveness and reaffirms the urgency for replacing the egg-based production of influenza vaccines.”

It gets worse, far worse.

Here is evidence I have cited for several years now. It comes from a 2013 review:

Dr. Peter Doshi, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals a monstrosity.

As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.

This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.

So they don’t have the flu.

Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly prevent all those “flu cases” that aren’t flu cases.

The vaccine couldn’t possibly work.

The vaccine isn’t designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.

Here’s the exact quote from Peter Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):

“…even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} are found to be influenza positive.

“…It’s no wonder so many people feel that ‘flu shots’ don’t work: for most flus, they can’t.”

Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren’t the flu.

Read More @

CME institutes next step in controlling Bitcoin price by initiating circuit breakers in futures market


by Kenneth Schortgen, The Daily Economist:

At the beginning of November the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) announced they were ready to implement new paper futures contracts for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies by the end of the year, thus bringing the ‘de-centralized’ asset under Wall Street financialization.  Now on Nov. 8 this same exchange has announced they are ready to engage circuit breakers to control the amount gains or losses Bitcoin can incur in a given market day.

Having taken a gamble on bitcoin futures, which are set to begin trading by the end of the year, the CME is now seeking to avoid the consequences of what has emerged as both the cryptocurrency’s best and worst selling point: its unprecedented volatility. To do that, the Chicago-based exchange will do what it does to virtually every other asset class traded under its roof, and impose limits on how much prices of bitcoin futures can fluctuate within a day. 

While the CME already uses daily vol limits on most other markets, including crude, gold and market futures, to temporarily halt trading when price swings get out of
control, the CME has never before dealt with something like bitcoin, which in addition to being the world’s best performing asset classes in recent years, is also its most volatile. And, as the WSJ adds, it is also unclear how much impact CME’s limits will have on bitcoin, since its futures market has yet to emerge and most trading in the digital currency is on exchanges outside of CME’s control. 

Read More @



by Geoffrey Grider, Now The End Begins:

“I’ll be the first to admit that we have to earn the trust of everybody,” Perez told Hartmann. “And I’ll be the first to admit that the DNC didn’t put its best foot forward in 2016 and because of that we have trust gaps.” Perez then explained how he asked Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) to serve as DNC Vice Chair to ensure a unified party.


EDITOR’S NOTE: The results of a year-long investigation into collusion between Trump and Russia continues to bring dirty deeds to light, but it’s the dirty deeds of of the Democratic Party that are bubbling up to the surface. The Uranium One Scandal, the Tony Podesta scandal, just wait for the proof on Pizzagate to come out! Ever since Donna Brazile’s book came out, there has not been one word or appearance from Hillary Clinton. It’s very funny watching Democrats struggle to put a happy face on it all, I have not seen spinning like this since my old Camaro got stuck in the snow back when I was a kid. 

Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Tom Perez admitted that the DNC fell short on ensuring that the Democrats’ presidential primary in 2016 was fair for everybody who ran during an interview on Tuesday.

Perez appeared on “The Thom Hartmann Program” to discuss accusations that the DNC rigged the primary process in favor of Hillary Clinton. Thom Hartmann asked Perez about these accusations and how he is working to resolve them.

“I’ll be the first to admit that we have to earn the trust of everybody,” Perez told Hartmann. “And I’ll be the first to admit that the DNC didn’t put its best foot forward in 2016 and because of that we have trust gaps.”

What Brazile showed was that money rules all else in the Democratic Party—the DNC was bankrupted, and Clinton’s campaign was the highest bidder to hoard as much special interest money into the DNC’s starving coffers. As a result, a progressive, anti-establishment candidate like Sanders had to fight more than a lack of name recognition, party leaders’ endorsements, financial and staffing disadvantages in 2016: he basically was up against a DNC strangled by Clinton’s money-soaked grip.

Read More @

Real Motive Behind Saudi Purge Emerges: $800 Billion In Confiscated Assets


from ZeroHedge:

From the very beginning, there was something off about Sunday’s unprecedented countercoup purge unleashed by Mohammad bin Salman on alleged political enemies, including some of Saudi Arabia’s richest and most powerful royals and government officials: it was just too brazen to be a simple “power consolidation” move; in fact most commentators were shocked by the sheer audacity, with one question outstanding: why take such a huge gamble? After all, there was little chatter of an imminent coup threat against either the senile Saudi King or the crown prince, MbS, and a crackdown of such proportions would only boost animosity against the current ruling royals further.

Things gradually started to make sense when it emerged that some $33 billion in oligarch net worth was “at risk” among just the 4 wealthiest arrested Saudis, which included the media-friendly prince Alwaleed.

One day later, a Reuters source reported that in a just as dramatic expansion of the original crackdown, bank accounts of over 1,200 individuals had been frozen, a number which was growing by the minute. Commenting on this land cashgrab, we rhetorically asked “So when could the confiscatory process end? As we jokingly suggested yesterday, the ruling Saudi royal family has realized that not only can it crush any potential dissent by arresting dozens of potential coup-plotters, it can also replenish the country’s foreign reserves, which in the past 3 years have declined by over $250 billion, by confiscating some or all of their generous wealth, which is in the tens if not hundreds of billions. If MbS continues going down the list, he just may recoup a substantial enough amount to what it makes a difference on the sovereign account.”

Then an article overnight from the WSJ confirmed that fundamentally, the purge may be nothing more than a forced extortion scheme, as the Saudi government – already suffering from soaring budget deficits, sliding oil revenues and plunging reserves – was “aiming to confiscate cash and other assets worth as much as $800 billion in its broadening crackdown on alleged corruption among the kingdom’s elite.

As we reported yesterday, the WSJ writes that the country’s central bank, the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority, said late Tuesday that it has frozen the bank accounts of “persons of interest” and said the move is “in response to the Attorney General’s request pending the legal cases against them.” But what is more notable, is that while we first suggested – jokingly – on Monday that the ulterior Saudi motive would be to simply “nationalize” the net worth of some of Saudi Arabia’s wealthiest individuals, now the WSJ confirms that this is precisely the case, and what’s more notably is that the amount in question is absolutely staggering: nearly 2x Saudi Arabia’s total foreign reserves!

As the WSJ alleges, “the crackdown could also help replenish state coffers. The government has said that assets accumulated through corruption will become state property, and people familiar with the matter say the government estimates the value of assets it can reclaim at up to 3 trillion Saudi riyal, or $800 billion.”

While much of that money remains abroad – and invested in various assets from bonds to stocks to precious metals and real estate – which will complicate efforts to reclaim it, even a portion of that amount would help shore up Saudi Arabia’s finances.

A prolonged period of low oil prices forced the government to borrow money on the international bond market and to draw extensively from the country’s foreign reserves, which dropped from $730 billion at their peak in 2014 to $487.6 billion in August, the latest available government data.

Read More @

Healthcare Spending Now Accounts For Almost One-Fifth Of The Entire U.S. Economy


by Michael Snyder, End Of The American Dream:

Everybody agrees that healthcare costs are way too high.  Back in 1960, healthcare spending accounted for approximately 5 percent of GDP, and by 2020 it is being projected that healthcare spending will account for 20 percent of GDP.  And when you break those numbers down into actual dollars, they become even more staggering.  Back in 1960, an average of $146 was spent on healthcare per person for the entire year, but today that number has skyrocketed to $9,990.  On a per capita basis, we spend far more than anyone else in the world on healthcare.  In fact, we spend almost twice as much as most other industrialized nations on a per capita basis.  Something has gone terribly wrong, and we desperately need to get this fixed.

Just between the years of 1996 and 2013, our spending on healthcare rose by a whopping 900 billion dollars, and it is estimated that healthcare spending now accounts for nearly one-fifth of the entire U.S. economy.  The following comes from the Daily Mail

US healthcare spending rocketed $900 billion between 1996 and 2013, staggering new data reveal.

Americans spend more money on healthcare than any other population, and increasingly so.

By 2013, total healthcare spending hit $2.1 trillion, according to the study published today in the Journal of the American Medical Association. The researchers say that figure has now likely soared to more than $3.2 trillion, which equates to 18 percent of the country’s economy.

So why is healthcare spending going up so much?

Well, the truth is that our population is aging, obesity is certainly on the rise, and medical care has become much more expensive.  In addition, we should acknowledge there are a couple of other major factors that we should acknowledge as well

First, the United States relies on company-sponsored private health insurance. The government created programs like Medicare and Medicaid to help those without insurance. These programs spurred demand for health care services. That gave providers the ability to raise prices. Other efforts to reform health care and cut costs raised them instead.

Second, chronic illnesses, such as diabetes and heart disease, have increased. They are responsible for 85 percent of health care costs. Almost half of all Americans have at least one of them. They are expensive and difficult to treat.

As a result, the sickest 5 percent of the population consume 50 percent of total health care costs. The healthiest 50 percent only consume 3 percent of the nation’s health care costs.

Healthcare costs are only expected to rise even more in the years ahead, and so we desperately need to reform our system.

Because as it is, health insurance premiums are becoming completely unaffordable.  According to CNBC, health insurance premiums for plans purchased through an employer will be higher than ever next year…

Next year, employers expect to spend $8,527 per enrolled employee, according to data form the National Business Group on Health. Meanwhile, workers themselves will contribute an average of $2,752 toward their premiums.

And for those that have to purchase their own health insurance, things are even worse.  In fact, it is being projected that the average rate increase for Obamacare plans will be 37 percent in 2018.

Read More @

The Bloodlines Of ‘The Billionaires Club’ Run Deep – Starting With Antifa’s ‘Puppet Master’ George Soros, This Look At Some Of The World’s Richest People Is Revealing, With A HUGE Surprise!


by William B Stoecker, All News Pipeline:

Leftists, who believe whatever they are told to believe (because they are “intellectual free thinkers”), like to imagine that the super-rich are mostly “right wing extremists,” meaning anyone to the right of Karl Marx. But, in reality, many of the richest people support leftist causes, and the few who do not mostly support RINO Republicans or the equivalent. 

There don’t seem to be any at all who openly tell the truth about the New World Order (NWO) conspiracy or oppose it in any way. But how can “capitalists” support Marxism? How can communists ally themselves with billionaires? The answer is simple. Most of the super-rich do not believe in true free market competitive capitalism, but in crony capitalism, a system of monopolies in bed with the government. 

As for the leading communists, none of them, not even Marx himself, have ever truly believed in the “classless society,” the “withering away of the state,” or “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” This is meaningless claptrap designed to fool the UIs (useful idiots) at the bottom of the Marxist pyramid. Communism, not religion, is the true “opiate of the masses.” Communism is, quite simply, fascism, and it was never intended to be anything else. 

So it should not surprise us that some of the richest people, like John D. Rockefeller and his descendants, have proudly supported one world government and set up tax free foundations to support every leftist cause. Consider the various Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie foundations which have gained control of modern medicine and education. John D. said “competition is sin,” and David Rockefeller openly admitted his support for a one world government. 

Most patriots are aware that George Sauron (Soros) is behind ACORN and La Raza, the Tides Foundation, the “Open Society” Foundation, Media Matters,, and the Center for American “Progress,” and supports Planned “Parenthood” and the Southern Poverty Law Center. Born Gyorgy Schwartz in Hungary on 8/12/30, Sauron has a net worth of some $25 billion dollars, mostly acquired via currency speculation. 

Anyone familiar with the effects of fiat money and its manipulation by the central banks can see how easy it is for people with the right connections to know in advance what the money supply and interests rates will be and become fabulously wealthy with little effort or risk…and it requires no great intelligence to do it. Sauron, during WWII, helped Nazi officials confiscate the wealth of his fellow Jews and considers that period to be a happy one for him. 

Fewer are aware of Peter Sutherland, a grotesque creature who was an executive at Goldman Sachs, a.k.a. bankster central, and then British Petroleum (the nice people who gave us the Gulf oil spill). Peter supports “free” trade, open borders, and unlimited immigration of Muslims and Africans into what is left of Europe. He is a Bilderberger, and has been on the European Commission and was for a time Honorary Chairman of the Trilateral Commission. 

Read More @

When Donna Brazile begged Hillary Clinton to find Seth Rich’s killer, Hillary “blew her off”

by Alex Christoforou, The Duran:

Hillary Clinton ended a call with Donna Brazile after plea to find Seth Rich’s killer.

Yesterday The Duran reported the stunning revelation that DNC cheater turned DNC turncoat, Donna Brazile went ABC’s This Week on Sunday to proclaim that,  “They Don’t Know What It’s Like to Bury a Child. I did – Seth Rich.”

During her interview with George Stephanopoulos, Donna Brazile said this about murdered staffer Seth Rich

“Why am I supposed to be the only person who unable to tell my story? I’ve heard a lot of people tell me various things as well. But here’s what they don’t know. They don’t know what it was like to be over the DNC during this hacking. They don’t know what it’s like to bury a child. I did, Seth Rich.“

The Gateway Pundit reports that in her new book, “Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns that Put Donald Trump in the White House,” Democrat political operative Donna Brazile recounts Hillary Clinton’s reaction to Seth Rich’s murder.

Hillary blew her off after asking the failed presidential candidate to help to find DNC staffer Seth Rich’s killer.

Read More @

James Woods is on a Roll! Destroys Fauxcahontas Over NRA-Bashing Tweet


by Cristina Laila, The Gateway Pundit:

Patriotic actor James Woods is on a roll defending the 2nd Amendment against the lunatics on the left.

Democrats immediately called for more gun control and condemned the NRA following the mass shooting in Texas on Sunday.

The NRA had nothing to do with Sunday’s massacre, yet the Democrats are out in full force condemning the gun rights advocacy group.

In fact, Sunday’s mass shooting debunked every Democrat talking point on gun control. The government failed to enter Kelley’s name into a criminal database after he was dishonorably discharged from the Air Force for assaulting his wife and child. Law abiding citizens with guns pursued the shooter, ultimately stopping him from killing more people.

The brilliant Senator from Massachusetts just couldn’t help herself and sent out an absurd tweet about America’s gun policies.

James Woods set her straight…

“The @NRA doesn’t control this country’s gun policies. They are controlled by the Constitution of the United States.”

Read More @

Germany Blazing New Trail: First in Europe to Officially Recognize ‘Third Sex’


from Sputnik News:

Germany has joined the ranks of countries that now officially recognize a so-called “third sex.”

Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court has ruled that a term covering those people who do not correlate themselves with either the male or female sex or those that eschew traditional gender identities must be created. Thus, the new term should be used in all official documents, including birth certificates.

The decision was made after an intersex person, who doesn’t belong to either of the genders, according to chromosomal analysis brought about a legal challenge after attempting to change the registered sex to “inter” or “divers.”

Before the ruling was made, German civil law stipulated that a child must be listed as male or female, or that particular section in the certificate be left blank.

According to judges such requirements violate the constitution’s provisions on privacy and discrimination.

“Courts and administrative authorities are no longer allowed to apply the relevant standards, insofar as they amount to an obligation to indicate the sex of persons whose sex development has variations in relation to female or male sexual development and who therefore do not permanently assign themselves to male or female sex,” the ruling said.

Read More @