by Kenneth Schortgen, The Daily Economist:
Last week a Federal judge threw out a case against the Democratic National Convention (DNC) citing that because the institution is a corporate entity, they have the legal right to rig or fix their primary election processes as they see fit.
In fact during the trial, DNC lawyers did not even dispute this assertion but validated it as the primary selection process could be rigged in any fashion they saw fit to result in the candidate they felt was best equipped to win the general election.
Amazingly, the DNC’s attorneys never bothered refuting the lawsuit’s claim that the primary process was biased against Clinton’s rival, Bernie Sanders.
Instead, they argued that the DNC has a right to conduct primaries however it chooses, and, furthermore, that Sanders supporters knew the primaries were rigged, therefore relieving the DNC of any responsibility it might’ve had.
Here’s more from the New York Observer:
“DNC attorneys claim Article V, Section 4 of the DNC Charter—stipulating that the DNC chair and their staff must ensure neutrality in the Democratic presidential primaries—is “a discretionary rule that it didn’t need to adopt to begin with.” Based on this assumption, DNC attorneys assert that the court cannot interpret, claim, or rule on anything associated with whether the DNC remains neutral in their presidential primaries.” - Zerohedge
And now you know why corporations control the government (Fascism), and voters have little if any say in the selection of candidates outside of the general election. It is also why the High Court has ruled that corporations have the same rights as individuals, and corporate PACS can spend as much money as they want on candidates where the common person is limited in how much they can donate.
Read More @ TheDailyEconomist.com