by Matt Margolis, PJ Media:
The COVID chapter never closed the way many expected; it didn’t end with a clean summary or a shared understanding of what worked and what didn’t. It ended with questions pushed aside and timelines that never fully lined up.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Now those questions keep coming back.
The New York Post’s Miranda Devine laid out a case that revisits the vaccine rollout, the messaging that followed, and the consequences that came with both. The focus lands on decisions made during the Biden administration and the gap between what people were told and what later surfaced.
But when the FDA’s senior medical officer, Dr. Ana Szarfman, whose job was to monitor the vaccine data for warning signs, repeatedly raised the alarm throughout 2021, she was ignored, and emails show her colleagues tried to stop her from using a newer, more accurate statistical methodology to investigate the data.
Finally, in September 2021, the same month that President Joe Biden announced vaccine mandates for all federal workers and large companies, she was told to “cease and desist” her analysis.
The original push carried certainty. Officials spoke with confidence about effectiveness, long-term protection, and the broader goal of stopping transmission.
President Joe Biden and public health leaders delivered a message that left little room for doubt. People heard that message everywhere, from press briefings to workplace mandates.
Over time, the message shifted.
Breakthrough cases increased, and booster recommendations followed. Public statements changed tone, but many earlier claims stayed in circulation long after they stopped matching reality, a disconnect that didn’t need in-depth analysis. People watched it play out in real time.
