Tuesday, October 6, 2026

Testing: How to Create a Pandemic of Fake Disease

0
660

by Kit Knightly, Off Guardian:

Last week, I was reading the latest module of the UK’s Covid Inquiry while working on our most recent Covid Factcheck, and I came across this paragraph…

From 24 June 2020, hospitals in England were required to undertake testing of asymptomatic patients upon admission and subsequently TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

During the “pandemic”, hospitals were testing all patients for Covid – symptoms or no – multiple times.

I found myself wondering if people really see how directives like this one were used to build a pandemic from nothing at all.

With reports of a “new variant” tearing across the United States, I thought now would be a good time to remind people how exactly “Covid” tests worked and what they were for.

Not in the biochemical way. We’re not talking RNA here, we’re talking about psycho-social manipulation: How test protocols can be used to create the impression of a pandemic that doesn’t actually exist.

So, to help people understand – and help those who already understand explain it to others – I wanted to remove all talk of PCR tests and lateral flows and viruses and Covid itself.

Because we’re talking about general mechanics rather than specifics, practical steps which exist outside of nomenclature and, indeed, can be camouflaged by same.

So…

Let’s imagine you’re trying to convince people of the existence of a deadly new disease.

Your major obstacle is that this disease does not exist. And, as such, you know it’s not going to make anybody ill and it’s not going to kill anyone.

But the good news is that every year tens of millions of people do get ill, and millions of those people do die.

Death and disease already exist, so to create the impression your fictional disease also exists all you need is a mechanism that links it to these pre-existing realities.

This mechanism is a “test”.

Your test needs to a follow a simple principle: it needs to reliably return results that can be interpreted as “positive” and “negative”.

Read More @ Off-Guardian.org