by Jack Montgomery, The National Pulse:
WHAT HAPPENED: The Guardian newspaper falsely reported that the National Security Agency (NSA) detected a call involving foreign intelligence and “a person close to Trump.” In fact, the call was between two people associated with foreign intelligence who merely “discussed” a third party close to Trump.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Guardian reporter Cate Brown, Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard, Gabbard’s deputy chief of staff Alexa Henning, and lawyer Andrew P. Bakaj.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
📍WHEN & WHERE: February 2026, the false report by The Guardian was rebutted on X (formerly Twitter).
💬KEY QUOTE: “Your story is false… Your leaker lied to you.” – Alexa Henning
🎯IMPACT: The Guardian issued a correction, undermining the credibility of the newspaper and the related accusations against the Trump administration peddled by lawyer Andrew P. Bakaj, who helped orchestrate the first impeachment effort against President Donald J. Trump in 2019.
A false report by Guardian U.S. political enterprise reporter Cate Brown has been amended after Alexa Henning, chief of staff to Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard, publicly challenged it on social media. Brown had inaccurately reported that “The NSA detected a phone call between foreign intelligence and a person close to Trump last spring,” based on the claims of a lawyer involved in 2019 impeachment efforts against President Donald J. Trump.
Responding to this allegation, Henning stated on X that the story was false, telling Brown, “Your leaker lied to you. And you ignored our requests to give us time to get you accurate information and published your story before we could respond.” She went on to describe Brown as “a total loser” being manipulated by her sources, likely in Congress, “to leak highly classified information.”
A subsequent amendment to The Guardian‘s report vindicated Henning, clarifying that “the phone call was between two people associated with foreign intelligence who discussed someone close to Donald Trump, not between someone and a person close to Trump.” The newspaper shifted blame for its initial false report by claiming it was “based on multiple phone calls with a source who later said he misspoke and clarified the actual details of the call”—but declined to apologize for rushing to publication without giving Gabbard’s office time to respond.
Notably, the “person close to Trump” is reportedly not even an administration official or special government employee.
Read More @ TheNationalPulse.com
