by Paul A. Philips, Activist Post:
It’s an inconvenient truth for the medical establishment knowing that their claims to vaccine safety and efficacy are riddled with obvious contradictions, irreconcilable errors and inconsistencies.
However, in spite of the fact that vaccines can maim or kill, care of their owned and controlled mainstream media, crooked health institutions, payed-off lawyers, bribed politicians, biased pseudo scientists, other corrupt self-interests…, the “safe and effective” fairytale still manages to pull the wool over the eyes of so many.
Many of these people don’t want to believe that vaccines not only cause so much harm, but are also ineffective. They willfully look the other way, averting any lines of rational enquiry. -A classic state of cognitive dissonance and denial even though nothing adds up when it comes to justifying vaccines.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Fanaticism in the vaccine religion
As someone who has done their due diligent research, have you ever found that when trying to point out the flaws to these ill-informed vaccine advocates, they just don’t get you. You just as well talk to the brick-wall behind them because these people are so fanatical, it’s as if they are blinded by their vaccine religion. -To them, you have just spoken out in blasphemy. Their “faith” in vaccines will not be shaken…
The propaganda that they have bought into in spite of the accompanying obvious contradictions, irreconcilable errors and inconsistencies is held together by the belief that vaccines are “safe and effective.”
-This unacceptable absurdity with all the related misconceptions, generating dysfunctionality, potential harm from vaccine damage through blind ignorance, needs be pointed out. It can be done at least by exposing the inconvenient truth. From this, insights or can be gained, realizations made, subsequent actions taken.
Inconvenient truths the obvious contradictions, irreconcilable errors and inconsistencies
In spite of the flaws, why does the medical establishment continue to hold on so tightly to vaccine ideology with its paradigm approaches?
Consider the following 3 reasons.
