by Matt Agorist, The Free Thought Project:
(Children’s Health Defense) “I am all for technology … we just want to fast-track safety,” wireless radiation expert Theodora Scarato told political commentator Kim Iversen.
In an interview on “The Kim Iversen Show,” Scarato said many people are rightly concerned about the health impacts of wireless technologies and infrastructures. “What it comes down to is that the federal government has failed to adequately protect us with up-to-date limits” for wireless radiation exposure, she told Iversen.
Scarato directs the Wireless and EMF (electromagnetic field) Program for Environmental Health Sciences.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) hasn’t updated its wireless radiation safety limits since 1996, Scarato told Iversen. And the agency still has yet to comply with a 2021 court mandate to explain how its limits protect human health.
Children’s Health Defense (CHD) on Tuesday filed a motion with the FCC, urging it to comply with the court mandate.
How can residents or city leaders feel confident that cell towers are safe “when the FCC can’t even explain how those limits are adequate?” Scarato asked.
But Iversen said everyone is “just thinking about convenience.” They’re not thinking, “Are these towers going to cause long-term damage to pregnant women and their babies?”
Many other countries have “much more restrictive” wireless radiation limits, Scarato said. In fact, the U.S. allows 10 to 100 times more radiation from cell towers than several countries, “including China and Russia, which have active research programs on the issue,” she told Iversen.
Belgium, Italy and Switzerland also have far stricter limits.
Read More @ TheFreeThoughtProject.com
