by Ann Coulter, Townhall:
No matter how much I try to ignore the Democrats’ latest “The Walls Are Closing In” spectacle, it has come to my attention that liberals are hopping mad about our military killing two Venezuelan drug traffickers.
Cocaine has killed 100,000 Americans in the last 20 years. Venezuela is a major player in the supply chain that brings it here. But Democrats are concerned with the safety and well-being of the narco-terrorists. Of course, Democrats also root for cop-killers, serial rapists, wife-beaters, drug kingpins, cold-blooded killers and Ana Navarro.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Liberals are OK with killing people unless it’s good for America. They want our military sticking its nose into every bar fight around the globe, while leaving the bad guys in our hemisphere alone.
That’s how we remain a “great power” that is “engaged in the world,” and, at the same time, create opportunities for Council on Foreign Relations types to go on TV and explain the differences between Sunni and Shia Muslims (no one cares), the strategic importance of the Donbas (no one cares), and the history of ethnic hatreds in the Balkans (no one cares).
Democrats have presented a scrolling series of defenses for the narco banditos that will surely be abandoned for all-new idiotic arguments next week, but these are the current favorites:
1. The two (briefly) surviving narco-terrorists should have been “rescued” as soon as they were “unable to continue their mission.”
Their boat was hit. How’re you going to traffic drugs when your boat has a hole in it? As put by the Former JAGs Working Group (JAGs who were summarily fired by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth back in February), the Venezuelans “were rendered unable to continue their mission” after the first strike, and therefore it was a “war crime” for our troops not to rescue them. (Killing them, I gather, was absolutely off the table.)
