What the ‘Godfather of Vaccines’ Said Under Oath — and Why It Matters Even More Today

0
623

by Matt Agorist, The Free Thought Project:

(Children’s Health Defense) I recently purchased Aaron Siri’s new book “Vaccines, Amen.” As I flipped through the pages, I noticed a section devoted to his now-famous deposition of Dr. Stanley Plotkin, the “godfather” of vaccines.

I’d seen viral clips circulating on social media, but I had never taken the time to read the full transcript — until now.

Siri’s interrogation was methodical and unflinching … a masterclass in extracting uncomfortable truths.

A legal showdown

In January 2018, Plotkin, a towering figure in immunology and co-developer of the rubella vaccine, was deposed under oath in Pennsylvania by attorney Aaron Siri.

TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

The case stemmed from a custody dispute in Michigan, where divorced parents disagreed over whether their daughter should be vaccinated. Plotkin had agreed to testify in support of vaccination on behalf of the father.

What followed over the next nine hours, captured in a 400-page transcript, was extraordinary.

Plotkin’s testimony revealed ethical blind spots, scientific hubris and a troubling indifference to vaccine safety data.

He mocked religious objectors, defended experiments on mentally disabled children and dismissed glaring weaknesses in vaccine surveillance systems.

A system built on conflicts

From the outset, Plotkin admitted to a web of industry entanglements.

He confirmed receiving payments from Merck, Sanofi, GSK, Pfizer and several biotech firms. These were not occasional consultancies but long-standing financial relationships with the very manufacturers of the vaccines he promoted.

Plotkin appeared taken aback when Siri questioned his financial windfall from royalties on products like RotaTeq, and expressed surprise at the “tone” of the deposition.

Siri pressed on: “You didn’t anticipate that your financial dealings with those companies would be relevant?”

Plotkin replied: “I guess, no, I did not perceive that that was relevant to my opinion as to whether a child should receive vaccines.”

The man entrusted with shaping national vaccine policy had a direct financial stake in its expansion, yet he brushed it aside as irrelevant.

Contempt for religious dissent

Siri questioned Plotkin on his past statements, including one in which he described vaccine critics as “religious zealots who believe that the will of God includes death and disease.”

Read More @ TheFreeThoughtProject.com