by Camus, The Burning Platform:
In the age of instant information, the story of ivermectin stands as one of the strangest psyops in modern medical history. Once hailed as a Nobel Prize-winning breakthrough for parasitic diseases, this profoundly safe drug—used by billions with an unmatched safety profile—was suddenly cast as a “fool’s remedy” during the pandemic. Critics dismissed it as ineffective, even dangerous, while mainstream narratives painted it as conspiracy fodder.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
But here’s the twist: ivermectin’s ability to inhibit viral replication in vitro, especially against single-stranded RNA viruses, is well-documented. The logic is simple—if it works broadly across this class of viruses, why wouldn’t it have some effect on SARS-CoV-2? Yet, despite its low toxicity and global track record, the drug was vilified, ridiculed, and buried beneath layers of institutional skepticism.
Joe Rogan and Bret Weinstein have both highlighted the irony: in an era where anyone can instantly verify facts, the campaign against ivermectin relied on repetition, not evidence. The narrative was clear—“it didn’t work, it’s nonsense”—but the real story is more complex. The drug’s safety, its broad antiviral potential, and the sheer volume of real-world data from countries where it was used widely suggest the truth was far from settled.
Read More @ TheBurningPlatform.com
