Charlie Kirk, Epstein, and the Zionist CabalCharlie Kirk, Epstein, and the Zionist Cabal

0
670

by Donald Jeffries, ”I Protest”:

Thomas Paine began his classic revolutionary pamphlet Common Sense with “These are the times that try men’s souls.” Imagine what old Tom would think of these times. Our souls are literally on trial; the satanic forces that thoroughly run this world vying against a faith in all that’s good and right, which some of us cling to fiercely.

TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

The Charlie Kirk assassination, or whatever it was, is not going quietly into Dylan Thomas’s good night. Candace Owens alone is seeing to that. Candace has released what certainly look to be authentic texts from Charlie Kirk, written on September 8, two days before he was shot. In one, Charlie declares, “Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this. Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause.” Now that kind of sentiment simply won’t do. Not in a land like ours, completely subservient to Zionism. So they simply rewrote the history. They do this all the time. Even someone from Turning Point USA, who had been in the private chat and personally saw the damning texts, said publicly that Charlie had “stood with Israel to his last breath.” Then Charlie’s unredacted seven page letter to Netanyahu was released. In it, he expresses the kind of adoration that today’s Right invariably feels for the “chosen.” Except that it was written on May 2.

The trumpeting of Charlie’s predictable genuflecting to Netanyahu was rendered irrelevant by the release of those final texts. This reminded me of how a desperate state controlled media produced a supposed deathbed audio confession from Jack Ruby, in which he swore that he had acted alone. The better evidence, which was captured on clear video, revealed Ruby confessing that “The world will never know the true facts of what occurred, my motives. The people who had so much to gain, and had such an ulterior motive for putting me in the position I’m in will never let the true facts come aboveboard to the world.” When a reporter then asked him, “Are these people in very high positions Jack?” Ruby replied, “Yes.” Ruby’s brother Earl was on hand to verify that the mob connected nightclub owner had acted alone. Oswald’s brother Robert toed the official line, too. They can’t find a disloyal brother in this case, because Charlie Kirk was an only child. Maybe an ambitious cousin?

Now they have found video of Charlie’s Chief of Staff pretty much scurrying away from the area as soon as the shot was fired. Seems like strange behavior to me, but then again I am an incorrigible Thought Criminal. It’s important to look at Charlie Kirk himself. As I’ve said before, it’s pretty hard for an eighteen year old to convince billionaires to back his pet project. Most of us don’t know a single billionaire. How did young Charlie draw the attention of more than one? Then there are the usual contradictory bits of information found via internet searches. For instance, it is claimed that there aren’t clear results for a Charles or Charlie James Kirk, aged 31, born in either Illinois or Arizona. Then there was the book on the Kirk assassination, which was posted with a publication date of September 9, one day before the shooting. Amazon blamed it on “technical issues.” We have seen these same kinds of “technical issues” in the Sandy Hook case, Boston Bombing, and other widely reported events.

Our intrepid FBI director, Kash Patel, lashed out at those who are questioning the ridiculous official narrative of Charlie Kirk’s shooting. Naturally, he dismissed them as “conspiracy theorists,” as those running our intelligence agencies have done since that infamous April 1, 1967 CIA memo on “Countering Criticism of the Warren Report.” But then he called them “anarchists.” That’s an interesting adjective to use. Sure, maybe some who see through the absurd official explanation are anarchists, but I think many more aren’t. It’s no wonder that Kash always has that terrified, deer-in-the-headlights look. He’s being asked to defend lots of indefensible things. To declare, with a straight face, that there was no Epstein List. And now, to go even further and claim that actually Epstein didn’t traffic any females, underage or otherwise. But on X, he does a good job of bragging about alleged arrests being made. Alleged criminals being brought to justice. Just none of the Deep State villains we know and love.

Read More @ donaldjeffries.substack.com