by Lawyer Lisa, LawyerLisa’s Substack:
On August 24, 2025 I reported that a story was being covered in the UK that showed Britain just ordered mobile morgues.
“ When the UK Home Office quietly signed contracts for mass death tents, hard mobile morgues and refrigerated buildings that could hold up to 700 bodies, it barely made the news. Some regional media picked up on it. But beyond that? Silence. Jim Ferguson responds, saying that both the scope of the contracts and the intentions behind them should have been…
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
I went through my spam today where I found some interesting messages.
“As an Aussie with little trust in our Govts am very interested to read your words today about a Govt scenario which is similar to what took place in Tasmania at Port Arthur in about April 1966. During the preceding 3-4 yrs a couple of politicians had publically said “It will take a gun massacre in Tasmania before there is any restriction on firearms”. Or words to that effect. Around 18 months prior to the mass slaying of about 35 at Port Arthur the Tassie Govt bought a mobile morgue vehicle which carried about 20 corpses. About 1.5 yrs after the Massacre it was sold to a wrecker in Rockhampton QLD and effectively disappeared.”
The Tasmania massacre was the IMPETUS FOR GUN SUPPRESSION LAWS IN AUSTRALIA.
HERE is the Official Narrative of the Tasmania Massacre
Official narrative OF THE TASMANIA MASSACRE – LONE NUT
“The Port Arthur massacre of 28-29 April 1996 was a killing spree which claimed the lives of 35 people and wounded 37 others mainly at the historic Port Arthur prison colony, a popular tourist site in south-eastern Tasmania, Australia.[4] The attack was perpetrated by “lone nut” Martin Bryant, a 28-year-old from New Town, a suburb of Hobart, who (in spite of having an IQ of only 66) displayed considerable shooting skills, killing 12 people in 15 seconds.[5][6] After initially denying responsibility, Bryant pleaded guilty to the crimes and was given 35 life sentences without possibility of parole.”
THE RESULT OF THE MASSACRE? GUN SUPPRESSION LAWS. PRIME MINISTER JOHN HOWARD:
“We need to achieve a total prohibition on the ownership, possession, sale and importation of all automatic and semi-automatic weapons. That will be the essence of the proposal that will be put by the Commonwealth government at the meeting on Friday…”
John Howard [16]
WATCH POLITICIAN DESCRIBE NEEDING A GUN MASSACRE AT TASMANIA IN ORDER TO GET …GUN CONTROL LEGISLATION
Alternative culpability
“It will take a massacre in Tasmania before we get gun law reform in Australia.”
Barry Unsworth (29 April 1996) [7]
Right after the event and ever since concerns about the official narrative have been raised.
Tavistock Institute
Allen Douglas and Michael J. Sharp wrote in EIR that the British security services through the Tavistock Institute connected psychiatrist that were evaluating Bryant.[8]
The Mossad
Joe Vialls claimed early on that the Mossad did it, but that it was covered up by the Australian government.[9][10] While this theory was the most popular originally, following the introduction of gun control, the gun control narrative became the most popular narrative, especially amongst US viewers of this event, who note the same gun control theories about various events in USA.
Australian “domestic terrorists”
Some[Who?] have claimed that this may have been done by “domestic terrorists” aiming to control tourist traffic to Australia, and in particular trying to prevent foreign tour guides (especially Japanese) from taking jobs away from Australians. Unlike the above two theories, this is in line with previous government policies, and is supported by the gunman’s statement, immediately prior to the attack :”There are a lot of WASPS, not a lot of Japs”.[11][12]
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation
Gun lobbyists including the NRA had blamed the Australian government of organising it, through the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, in order to push forward the gun control that won the John Howard Government the election a couple of years later. The massacre was followed by “a nationwide overhaul of gun regulation, as well as the buyback of more than 650,000 firearms.”[5]
Read More @ lawyerlisa.substack.com
