by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star:
Do you remember Oumuamua, the strange comet-or-elongated-cigar-rock-or-asteroid-or-whatever-it-was that caused such a stir back in 2017 when it entered the solar system? For a while we were told it was a comet, but then it did a few very-un-comet-like things, like not speeding up as it should have when approaching the Sun, and then speeding up (like it should not have) when it headed away from the Sun. There were other oddities too, for it soon became apparent that Oumuamua was not a ball of space ice that comets usually are, not did it have a typical comet tail. It appeared to be an elongated cigar-shaped rock, or a pancake.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Well, good news folks (or maybe bad news; that will depend on your point of view I suppose), the people who track such things are now supposedly informing us that the area of deep space into which Oumuamua disappeared is showing signs of an object headed towards Earth, which some are assuming to be Oumuamua, which they’re also assuming has “turned back”, perhaps for a closer look, according to this story shared by quite a few of you (with our gratitude):
Oumuamua just turned back and CONFIRMS what WE ALL FEARED
Now, in mid-2025, tracking stations around several nations have spotted uncharacteristic movement from the part of space where ʻOumuamua was last known to be drifting. Based on initial data, the object (or something very much like an object) has apparently reversed direction — and is re-entering the solar system, heading on a path that takes it directly toward Earth’s general area.
Yes, you did read that correctly.
This is not typical behavior for a lump of inert rock. Even comets hurtled about the sun travel in predictable gravitational curves. ʻOumuamua, though, broke those rules previously — and it seems to be doing so once again.
As usual, I will adopt my normal methodology of assuming the story to be true for the sake of developing some high octane speculation. But today, the high octane speculation involves a new twist, namely, assuming that the story might not be true, but merely a narrative being put out there by the Powers That Be for whatever new nefarious purpose they might have in the vacuum space where their brains should be. Thus, we assume two divergent and mutually contradictory premises: (1) the story is true, and the object is Oumuamua, and is returning; and (2) the story is not true, but the narrative of Oumuamua’s return is being put out there anyway.
There appears to be some minor corroboration of the second possibility from the article itself, which I have italicized in its wider context:
What Could It Mean?
There are some possible explanations:
Natural, but not understood physics: Others contend that what we are seeing might be a natural occurrence that we just don’t yet comprehend — maybe some new type of interstellar object with gas-releasing properties or odd reflective surfaces.
Technological origin: The much more radical theory — the one picking up steam in internet forums and rumored among certain astronomers — is that ʻOumuamua is not an asteroid at all. That it could be a man-made structure — perhaps an exploration probe, or worse, a guard.
Intelligent control: The fact that it’s heading back our way? That’s what scares me the most. Gravity doesn’t do it. Rocks don’t do it. Someone — or something — might be flying it.
What Are Officials Saying
Not much — which in itself is suspicious. Though space agencies such as NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) have confirmed monitoring unusual activity, they’ve avoided giving out any theories or conclusions so far. Leaked memos and internal documents, however, indicate close behind-the-scenes action.
One source, who wished to remain anonymous, said:
“We’ve never seen anything like this. If it’s natural, it breaks all our models. If it’s not… we need to start asking harder questions about what’s really out there.” (emphasis added)
So there you have it: the story appears to be founded on the usual less-than-footnote-worthy “sources”, in this case, “leaked memos”, “internal documents”, and a quoted “anonymous source” which – for all we know – might be some artificial intelligence cooking up a private practical joke during its fifteen minute break at a klepto-currency data-mining service.
The article also notes that there are really only two good ways of explaining this odd behavior being alleged for the alleged object (did I mention that this is all alleged?): firstly, it could be an example of some hitherto unknown “new physics” that we simply have not encountered before, which could be due to almost anything (it is, after all, “unknown’); or secondly, the physics is perfectly well-known, and such things just do not happen to your ordinary run-of-the-mill comet or space rock, unless they’re under some sort of control and direction. Control and direction imply, of course, someone doing the controlling and directing, and that in turn implies some sort of motive for doing so. The article itself mentions one motive:
Technological origin: The much more radical theory — the one picking up steam in internet forums and rumored among certain astronomers — is that ʻOumuamua is not an asteroid at all. That it could be a man-made structure — perhaps an exploration probe, or worse, a guard.
Intelligent control: The fact that it’s heading back our way? That’s what scares me the most. Gravity doesn’t do it. Rocks don’t do it. Someone — or something — might be flying it. (Emphasis added)
“Exploration probe”? Possibly even “reconnaissance”? That’s concerning, because it implies someone at “the other end” of Oumuamua that is receiving the “field reports”: “Don’t worry, the little monkeys are no threat; we can proceed with our plans.” The plans might be anything, from invasion to a kind of cosmic “eminent domain” project where the planet is removed to make way for a new “spaceway”, a kind of inter-planetary freeway ala Douglas Adams’ humorous science fiction trilogy, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe. Reconnaissance after all usually precedes some sort of military action. And before such infrastructure projects are ordered, one first has to take the surveys.
