by Ethan Huff, Natural News:
Things are heating up on the war front as Adm. Rob Bauer, the head of NATO’s military committee, has revealed that as it concerns Russia and the war in Ukraine, the West is now shifting from defense to offense mode.
In a recent speech – watch below – Bauer explained how NATO will conduct “precision strikes” on Russia as necessary to protect its interests, regardless of what Vladimir Putin says against such actions.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Bauer says it is also smart for NATO to start attacking Russia’s military systems in order to stop them from being used to make any further advances in and through Ukraine.
“If Russia attacks us, you need to have a combination of the precision strike with which you can take out the weapon systems that are used to attack us,” Bauer said. “And, of course, because we’re a defensive alliance, we will have to take the first blow.”
“So, if Russia will start the conflict – because we are not going to attack Russia out of nothing – we will need more air defense. That’s one of the lessons from Ukraine. And at the same time, we are going to invest in the deep precision strike.”
Admiral #RobBauer, head of #NATO‘s Military Committee, says NATO may consider preemptive “precision strikes” on #Russian territory in case of conflict. He notes that the alliance is shifting from a defensive to a proactive approach, targeting Russian launchers if attacked. pic.twitter.com/BHiP1rElIi
— Ivan Kircanski (@KircanskiIvan) November 25, 2024
A whole new NATO based on offensive aggression
These are big words that some say will only further enrage Putin since as Bauer explained, NATO is supposed to be a defensive operation, not an offensive one.
“Pretty stupid to openly talk about preemptively striking your enemy on the world’s largest social media,” wrote someone on X / Twitter about Bauer’s public admissions. “What a bunch of globalist boneheads.”
The user who shared the above video, Ivan Kircanski (@KircanskiIvan), agreed, emphasizing the fact that NATO by its very existence is simply supposed to defend, not offend.
“Broadcasting preemptive strike plans on such a platform is reckless. Not only does it escalate tensions unnecessarily, but it also undermines NATO’s claims of being a defensive alliance. Strategic ambiguity seems like a smarter play, no?”
