by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star:
As soon as I opened last week’s emails and began to sort through them to schedule this week’s blogs and honourable mentions, I spotted this story and article shared by T. M., and knew that I’d have to blog about it. In fact, on this one there was no “internal debate” at all; it went right to the top of the heap and became this week’s “lead blog.”
NASA (or as we like to refer to it here, Never A Straight Answer, and Not A Space Agency) released a picture of a :”something” in September of last year (2023). Frankly, when I saw this, and saw the date on the article, it raised many questions, not the least was why no one seemed to have spotted it before, nor talked about it. Indeed, a quick search on Richard C. Hoagland’s radio show website, and his enterprisemission.com, did not yield any results. Curioser and curioser, though I don’t for a moment assume Mr. Hoagland missed this. More probable is that I simply missed his discussion of it somehow! In my case, part of the problem may be that the story was carried by The Economic Times, hardly a source for the latest in “space anomaly news”.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
But sure enough, a quick search on NASA’s own website confirmed the “dumpling,” or “ravioli”, “perogi”, or whatever it is, is indeed there, and was indeed photographed by NASA’s Cassini mission.
The “dumpling”, as some are calling it, is the moon of Saturn named “Pan”, that planet’s inmost moon, and what it shows is something as stunning as the famous pictures that probe took of the saturnian moon Iapetus:
Cassini Reveals Strange Shape of Saturn’s Moon Pan
The NASA article was, incidentally posted on 2017, which gives us 6 years before anyone at The Economic Times noticed it and posted their story. Cassini itself was launched in 1997, and entered orbit around Saturn in 2004. There’s no date indicated – at least as far as my very quick searches revealed – when the images of Pan (or for that matter, Iapetus), were taken. In any case, here’s the little moonlet Pan:
Now before we go any further toward the end of the twig of high octane speculation, let me just state that as far as I am concerned, this moonlet looks artificial. You may disagree, but I think it’s fairly safe to say that, regardless of one’s interpretation, it is mighty strange. Then we read a little further in The Economic Times‘ version of the story, and there’s this “disclosure”:
Elaborating on Pan, the US space agency said that it was discovered by M.R Showalter in 1990 using images taken by the Voyager 2 spacecraft nine years earlier.
You don’t say, and we’re just now really hearing about it? And what, pray tell, were the good folks at Never A Straight Answer doing all that time as they were pouring over their photographs? What were the conclusions? Who were the analysts looking at the pictures? &c.
On its dumpling shape, NASA said, “The ridge around Pan’s equator is similar to Saturn’s moon Atlas, and gives the moon its distinctive dumpling shape. (Emphasis added)
What a minute! You mean, there’s another saturnian moon with a little ridge running around it? There’s another “dumpling” in orbit around Saturn called Atlas? So we have not one, but two “dumplings” each with the telltale “ridge”? When one adds the three parallel ridges running along the equator of the saturnian moon Iapetus, that makes three saturnian moons, all with the telltale ridges. I need hardly remind the regular readers here of the old aphorism, “one is an anomaly, two is a coincidence, and three is a pattern.”
