by Daisy Luther, The Organic Prepper:
Is Tucker Carlson a traitor for his interview with Putin? Or is he just a journalist doing journalism?
Tucker aired his two-hour-long interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin on February 8. It received over 200 million views within the first week.
Why would he do an interview with Putin?
Tucker did a short video before the interview explaining his reasons for conducting it. He insists that he is not trying to tell anyone what to think, just exposing people to information not available from mainstream sources.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
If Americans are sending huge sums of money to Ukraine, we should understand what’s going on. He also notes that while the war has been a humanitarian disaster for Ukraine, it is also reshaping global alliances in ways Americans just don’t understand. And that has to change.
What did Putin say?
Many Americans have not heard Putin’s side of the story. According to Putin, the current war began in 2014 with the U.S.-backed Maidan coup in Ukraine. Other sources agree. In 2019, Brookings published an article describing the “low intensity but nevertheless real war with Russia”
In 2010, Ukraine elected a Russian-friendly leader, Victor Yanukovych, who was undoubtedly a Russian-backed crook. In 2014, a series of protests began over Yanukovych scuttling a trade deal with the EU at the behest of the Russians, as well as general levels of corruption. Putin insists that the CIA was involved in these protests. While mainstream sources insist that Ukraine’s riots were organic, evidence has since emerged that the CIA was involved.
After these protests, another leader, Petro Poroshenko, was installed. Low-level fighting took place off and on for years. Ethnic Russians living in Ukraine were killed during this fighting, and Putin gives this as his reason for ramping up his “special operation” in 2022.
Putin also brought up his desire to “de-Nazify” the region. Tucker asked him a variety of questions about this, about how a ruler bans opposition parties in other countries. Putin did not have a particularly clear answer.
However, his statements regarding NATO were more straightforward. Putin said that, after the breakup of the USSR, Russian leaders were given assurances that there would be no further eastward expansion of NATO. NATO’s continuous eastward expansion, particularly under President Bush Jr., has alarmed him. Putin brought up multiple instances, under both Bush and Clinton, where he thought he could work with American presidents, only to have those personal agreements later undercut by unelected officials within the federal government.
Tucker asked Putin about his Russian Orthodox faith and how it aligned with his political action in Ukraine because, as Tucker noted, Christianity is supposed to be nonviolent. Putin immediately deflected, saying that Eastern Christianity is far less concerned with one’s actions than Western Christianity and concerns itself with the state of one’s soul.
The last ten minutes or so were spent with Tucker pressing Putin about the release of Evan Gershkovich, the 32-year-old Wall Street Journal reporter who has been imprisoned in Russia for about a year.
The legacy media did not like this interview with Putin.
While many media outlets (CNN, The Independent, Irish Times) referred to it as a “softball interview,” Tucker attempted to redirect Putin multiple times during his initial half-hour-long history lesson, asking him to get to the point. Putin, each time, insisted he was getting there. His questions about Putin’s Christianity and Evan Gershkovich were polite but pointed.
I would never take Putin’s statements at face value. He’s a politician and former KGB. Of course, he’s going to exaggerate some things and omit others. We should all know this. But listening to interviews such as these should encourage us to ask questions and find answers on our own.
Are there really Nazis in Ukraine?
Did American leaders promise not to extend NATO eastward and then do it anyway?
Do average Russians think their life has gotten better or worse under Putin? What about Ukrainians and Zelensky?
Has the US been willing to discuss paths toward peace with Putin, or has Biden continually rejected the notion?
Did Ukraine and Russia come to a tentative agreement in April 2022, only to have Boris Johnson convince the Ukrainians not to back down?
The truth matters. These are all relevant questions.
Americans wanted to see this interview.
Tucker had a fine line to walk.
It’s not that easy to get interviews with heads of state. While Putin has rejected interview requests from mainstream American outlets, he was willing to grant one to Tucker because, as explained by Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov, “His position is different from the others. It is in no way pro-Russian, it is not pro-Ukrainian, it is pro-American, but at least it contrasts with the position of the traditional Anglo-Saxon media.”
Well, as we’ve discussed here before, Tucker does contrast with the rest of the media.
This interview got 200 million views in less than a week. For some measure of comparison, MSNBC’s most popular news host, Rachel Maddow, typically gets between 2 and 2.5 million views per show. Her interview with Liz Cheney got over 3 million, and that was a big bump. Tucker was the big conservative cable news show host. Rachel remains the biggest liberal one. And Tucker’s interviews sometimes score a hundred times as many views as Rachel’s.
Read More @ TheOrganicPrepper.ca
