CDC Backtracks on COVID Guidance — Is It a Political Ploy?

    0
    387

    by Dr. Joseph Mercola, Childrens Health Defense:

    Story at a glance:

    • Aug. 11, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reversed its COVID-19 guidelines, thereby vindicating every “misinformation spreader” out there.
    • The CDC is now advocating for taking personal responsibility and for everyone to decide for themselves “which prevention behaviors to use and when (at all times or at specific times), based on their own risk for severe illness and that of members of their household, their risk tolerance, and setting-specific factors.”

    TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

    • The CDC is also giving up on discrimination based on COVID-19 jab status, stating, its “COVID-19 prevention recommendations no longer differentiate based on a person’s vaccination status because breakthrough infections occur.” They also admit natural immunity exists and works.
    • Testing is now reserved for those who “are symptomatic, or have a known or suspected exposure to someone with COVID-19,” isolation is only for those who are symptomatic and have tested positive, and contact tracing is now restricted to health care settings and select “high-risk congregate settings.”
    • The CDC’s about-face appears to be politically motivated, to give the Biden administration a “win” before the midterm elections. Post-election plans include “the biggest vaccination campaign in history,” so tyrannical overreaches may later resume, even as mounting data show the COVID-19 shots are causing depopulation.

    Without fanfare, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Aug. 11, reversed all its COVID-19 guidelines. In fact, many have noted it appears the CDC wanted to bring as little attention to it as possible.

    This is understandable, considering the new guidelines more or less admit the original rules were in error, without actually stating as much.

    The new guidance is listed in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) under the title, “Summary of Guidance for Minimizing the Impact of COVID-19 on Individual Persons, Communities, and Health Care Systems — United States, August 2022.”

    As noted by Jeffrey Tucker, founder and president of the Brownstone Institute:

    “It would have been fascinating to be a fly on the wall in the brainstorming sessions that led to this little treatise. The wording was chosen very carefully, not to say anything false outright, much less admit any errors of the past, but to imply that it was only possible to say these things now.”

    The CDC insists that while COVID-19 infection continues to be a reality around the world, “high levels of vaccine- and infection-induced immunity and the availability of effective treatments and prevention tools have substantially reduced the risk for medically significant COVID-19 illness … and associated hospitalization and death.”

    Consequently, COVID-19 countermeasures that create “barriers to social, educational, and economic activity” can be ditched and everything can go back to normal.

    CDC introduces personal responsibility

    Considering how hard health officials have fought to segregate, bully, demonize and dehumanize people who didn’t agree with their tyrannical and irrational COVID-19 measures over the past 19 months, the new guidelines are refreshing, but they’re still like a slap in the face.

    First and foremost, the CDC is now suddenly advocating for taking personal responsibility — for everything:

    “Persons can use information about the current level of COVID-19 impact on their community to decide which prevention behaviors to use and when (at all times or at specific times), based on their own risk for severe illness and that of members of their household, their risk tolerance, and setting-specific factors. …

    “Education and messaging to help individual persons understand their risk for medically significant illness complements recommendations for prevention strategies based on risk.”

    Individual risk assessment and risk-based countermeasures are both something we “misinformation spreaders” have called for from the beginning. The risk is not identical for all; hence, risk reduction strategies should not be uniformly applied. Finally, 19 months late, the CDC agrees.

    Under the subhead, “Protecting Persons Most at Risk for Severe Illness,” the CDC now takes a page straight out of the Great Barrington Declaration and recommends focused protection, meaning protecting those “at particularly high risk … because of older age, disability, moderate or severe immunocompromise, or other underlying medical conditions.”

    Need anyone be reminded that doctors and scientists have been defamed and dragged through the mud for saying this?

    And Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and his former boss, Dr. Francis Collins, then-director of the National Institutes of Health, were the masterminds behind the effort to discredit and take down the authors of the Barrington declaration.

    Read More @ ChildrensHealthDefense.org