BREAKING: WHO Helping FDA to Skip Further COVID Vaccine Clinical Trials


    by Sayer Ji, Green Med Info:

    The “Future Framework” is coming from the World Health Organization, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the biggest voluntary contributor to the WHO, so Gates is likely directing the play

    Introduction: The FDA always rigs the game on behalf of Pharma

    Late Friday afternoon, the FDA released its agenda for the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meeting that will vote on the Orwellian “Future Framework” on Tuesday, June 28.

    TRUTH LIVES on at

    Then on Saturday morning, the FDA released a briefing document in connection with this scheme to end science as we know it in connection with future COVID-19 shots. (Much appreciation to the brilliant James Roguski for alerting me to these documents.)

    In this article, I will explain what is in the briefing document, what is likely to happen at the meeting and what can be done about it.

    The FDA’s ‘Future Framework’ briefing document

    The briefing document is 18 pages of text, 1.5 line spacing, with just 19 references — 9 of which are pre-prints or from the CDC’s in-house newsletter Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) which means they are not peer-reviewed.

    Any true believer in The Narrative(TM) could have written this in a few hours. To base the entire future of COVID-19 shots on this glorified undergrad term paper is madness.

    As I predicted, even though the April 6 meeting was presented as an exploratory initial conversation that reached no conclusions whatsoever, the “Future Framework” is now being presented by the FDA as a done deal, fait accompli, you’d have to be crazy to insist on proper safety studies.

    The core argument of the briefing document is hilarious (or rather, it would be hilarious if it was not a plan to permanently institutionalize genocide and hide the evidence). In several places the FDA argues (colloquialisms mine):

    1. These COVID-19 shots work great, miracles really, incredibly effective, boy howdy do they work well! Boosters too, total home run, the Israelis even have 10-weeks of data showing that they might help old people. What more evidence could you want?

    2. Okay, well, it depends on what you mean by “work.” These shots do not stop infection, transmission, hospitalization, or death, even though that’s why we licensed them. Any protection wears off fairly quickly, but It’s Not Our Fault(TM) because This Wily Virus(TM) mutates too fast and no one told us that it would ever mutate.

    3. So these shots must be reformulated but we cannot possibly ask Lord Pharma to do proper clinical trials ever again because we already know that these shots work great (see point #1)!

    The briefing document literally states:

    “The evaluation of modified vaccines for the purpose of vaccine strain composition decisions will need to rely mainly on comparative immunogenicity data due to the time constraints involved in vaccine manufacturing and clinical efficacy evaluation.”

    Did you catch that? The evaluation “will need to rely on” (no decision to be made here) measures other than actual health outcomes because of “time constraints.”

    Ah, $cience!

    Moderna, Pfizer and Novavax are all developing reformulated COVID-19 shots. But they know that the FDA is not going to look at health outcomes so they are going to great lengths to jack up the antibody response.

    Pfizer tested a double-strength dose (60 mcg of mRNA instead of 30 mcg) even though they had previously ruled out a higher dose because of safety concerns. So the antibody levels are through the roof.

    But the VRBPAC admitted on April 6 that there are no known correlates of protection (meaning: antibody levels do not tell you who will be immune) so these antibody measures are medically meaningless.

    Sane people realize that if you turbo charge the immune response, you may also turbo charge adverse events. But the “Future Framework” allows pharmaceutical companies to skip clinical trials altogether.

    Furthermore, all of these companies are developing shots to target the original Omicron strain (BA.1) even though it has already been supplanted by other variants (BA.4 and BA.5).

    The FDA and these companies claim that shots targeting BA.1 will be effective against later variants but I do not know how they can possibly argue that given the total absence of actual health data.

    Words that you will NOT find in the FDA “Future Framework” briefing document:

    • original antigenic sin,
    • antibody-dependent enhancement,
    • prion disease,
    • myocarditis,
    • VAERS
    • adverse events, or
    • side effects.

    So the FDA is literally not looking out for any of the worst-case scenario possibilities.

    The “Future Framework” is a plan to base the entire COVID-19 vaccine program on magical thinking rather than science.

    What’s likely to happen at the VRBPAC meeting on Tuesday, June 28

    The cartel is predictable because they follow a playbook and they use the same cast of characters over and over again.

    The first presentation will be by CDC staffer Heather Scobie. She will likely take her slides from the June 7 VRBPAC meeting, change the date on the first slide and update them a bit to show that Omicron has become the predominant SARS-CoV-2 variant in the U.S.

    The gist will be that there is no point in vaccinating against the “prototype” Wuhan lab leak variant, nor Alpha, Beta, Delta or Gamma, because it’s all Omicron right now.

    What she will NOT tell you is that Moderna and Pfizer are designing shots to target the BA.1 version of Omicron and now that variant is waning and being replaced by BA.4 and BA.5. Furthermore, she will not mention the fact that these shots are fueling the evolution of variants that evade any protection from vaccines.

    Dr. Scobie will be followed by another CDC staffer, Ruth Link-Gelles who will likely dust off one of her slide decks from the four VRBPAC and four ACIP meetings that have already happened this month and discuss COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in adults. RLG cracks me up because she absolutely does not give a damn.

    She shows slide after slide of negative efficacy from these worthless shots and she does not care because she knows that the VRBPAC will approve anything that has the word vaccine on the vial. RLG’s presentations are a token attempt to play it straight with the data but then all of her data is instantly memory-holed and never spoken of again.

    Then, I’ve got to hand it to the cartel for choosing their next speaker — Justin Lessler, from the University of North Carolina. Dr. Lessler has gotten 10 grants from the Bill &  Melinda Gates Foundation in recent years (see pages 26 to 30 of his CV here).

    Then he’s gotten another 10 grants from NIH and/or Tony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

    Read More @