Oh Look, Maths Showed Up @mayorwaters and @GovBillLee

0
260

by Karl Denninger, Market Ticker:

Isn’t it interesting that math showed up?

In their ruling, judges Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Paramés referred to several scientific studies. Most notably this study by Jaafar et al., which found that – when running PCR tests with 35 cycles or more – the accuracy dropped to 3%, meaning up to 97% of positive results could be false positives.

The ruling goes on to conclude that, based on the science they read, any PCR test using over 25 cycles is totally unreliable.

Of course it is.

TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

Why is it that none of these so-called “betters”, you know, elected leaders, ever took a single physics class?  Did none of them ever pass Algebra?

Oh, they did?

Well then what we’ve all had run on us by those people is a scam, not an accident.

Let me explain.

We rely on math and physics every single day.  They make flight possible, for example.  They explain why combustion of fuel works to move your car and heat your house.

And they both explain why “homeopathy” is quack-filled nonsense and, by the same principle, why nuclear decay eventually renders waste safe and such naturally-occurring elements do not kill us all as we walk around our homes, businesses and the great outdoors.

It is a fundamental principle of the latter, for example, that after ten half-lives there is an effective none of what you started with left.  What is a half-life?  It is the amount of time that a radioactive material requires for half of itself to decay.  So if you start with 10,000 atoms of some radioactive material after one half-life you have 5,000 of them remaining.

10,000
5,000
2,500
1,250
625
312
156
78
39
19
9
4
2
1

ZERO

Now is there truly zero waste left after 10 half-lives?  No, but the level of remaining waste is indistinguishable from background radiation that is naturally occurring no matter how much you started with which means you can now treat that substance as ordinary waste since it is not particularly dangerous compared to, say, a handful of dirt.  There is no such thing as “zero radiation” in the natural world.  Hold an alpha-reading geiger counter up to a banana and you will find it is radioactive; it has a small amount of radioactive potassium in it!  Not enough to be dangerous, but it’s there, as I showed in a video a few days ago explaining why masks in the general public are stupid since they both concentrate and transport things from one place to another, and by doing so are likely to increase risk.

So how does this work the other way?

Well, powers of two work both directions.  PCR “works” by duplicating whatever it tagged in each CT “turn”.  So if you start with “1” of something that you tag and run it 25 times you need only look at a power of 2 table (or use your “y^x” function on a calculator) to get the multiplication factor and thus how much you wind up with.

This is known to anyone who is even minimally competent as a programmer since computers operate on Base 2 and every one of those who program computers is extraordinarily familiar with that.  Well, they used to be before “learn to code” turned into “learn Java”, which is complete trash in that it doesn’t require you understand how a computer actually works!  So 1 “byte”, which has 8 bits, can represent 256 values.  A 16 bit “word” can represent 65,536 values.  And a 32-bit “long” or “word” can represent 4 billion values.

Thus, 16-bit computers had 65 kilobytes (65,536, to be exact) of memory addressable in one linear form; ala the Altair 8080 and the Zilog Z-80, ala TRS-80 because they had 16 address lines, each of which could be a “1” or a “0”.

So if I take something and multiply it through 32 turns of said crank I have four billion times whatever I started with.

But this presumes that “whatever I had” is in fact a sample from where I think I got it, not from somewhere else, and which arose only from what I believe the source was and was not collected by random chance from something floating around in the air or in the person in question.  In other words if the original “thing” I multiplied that 32 times was garbage then what I get out the other end is a steaming pile of garbage!  I cannot make something that doesn’t actually exist happen by multiplying it; I can only amplify an actual signal.  If the signal is indistinguishable from chance then what I have done is produce junk.

Likewise if I chemically analyzed that banana and by chance got the radioactive K-40 atom in my sample and then multiplied that atom by four billion times I’d be inclined to tell everyone that eating bananas will kill you!  But I’d be completely full of crap as K-40 is only 0.012% of the total of naturally-occurring Potassium and in that small amount it’s harmless.

Folks, this is not open to question.  The man who invented PCR said it was utterly unusable as a diagnostic tool for this reason.  The original purpose of PCR was to take a relatively small amount of some DNA and multiply it for research purposes because growing DNA in cells the “hard way”, then extracting and purifying it from that culture takes a long time and preventing contamination during the culture process is difficult while doing it in a lab with a chemical process is, by comparison, much faster.  It’s a very interesting technology and when used to “grow” things quite valuable.  But it cannot be used as a diagnostic, especially not when cycled 30 or more times, because it will pick up whatever happens to match its tag pattern and amplify it without regard to whether that item was actually produced by a current, live infection in the person sampled.

In other words you could be completely immune to Covid19, someone who had Covid but has recovered and has no live virus in their body coughs in your vicinity, they expel a small number of non-infectious pieces of virus from when they were infected, one of those pieces of RNA gets sucked into your nose when you inhale and then, before you sneeze or otherwise snot it out you get swabbed.  That piece of RNA which is not infectious and did not come from you as a result of your harboring and shedding infectious virus in the first place is then amplified four billion times and as a result you are given a “positive” test result.

But you’re not sick and you never will become sick because you were never exposed to live, infectious virus.

That it took this long for a court to rule that 2 + 2 = 4 is an outrage.

Read More @ Market-Ticker.org