Don’t Let Schools Propagandize Your Kids!


from Humans Are Free:

The following is a letter I wrote to my child’s school upon finding out some of the ideas they were trying to force upon her and her classmates as it relates to vaccines:

With the school year nearing its end my daughter recently brought home quite a sizeable pile of papers which have accumulated over the course of the year.

Reading through them I became extremely dismayed when I came across a printout of a Washington Post article titled, ‘Measles Spreading Across U.S. to Record High.’

Public Schools Are Brainwashing Factories For Children

The packet was essentially a propaganda sheet that could’ve been written by the pharmaceutical lobby itself. What made it so offensive was that it wasn’t just an article but in fact a sales pitch which attempted to sell our children on the ‘pressing need’ for receiving the MMR vaccine.

In my opinion, it is entirely irresponsible for a school to attempt to propagandize the minds of our children through scare tactics and fear-mongering promoted by a billion dollar industry.

The companies which create and promote these vaccines are literally criminal corporations with appalling records of human rights violations. It is unfortunate that this needs to be explained to those who are ostensibly tasked with teaching our children, but apparently it does.

The overall theme of the article was that the safety of vaccines, specifically the controversial MMR shot, has been settled. Nothing is further from the truth.

If this were the case the FDA would not have ordered the placement of over 100 dangerous ‘side effects’ to be listed on the insert to the vaccine, ranging in severity from rashes, vomiting, fever and diabetes to Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), febrile convulsions, seizures and death.

These are all listed on the vaccine manufacturers websites as well. They are not hard to find.

If the science were truly settled then why did Harvard Medical School MD John Abramson, author of the book Overdosed America: The Broken Promise of American Medicine say in response to a question he was asked about mandatory vaccination “the bottom line is that I think, what the science is, is incomplete. There is no question about it. And the politics of it, as the way it’s done, as a legal matter, and the inability of people who are injured by vaccines to sue for compensation, preventing plaintiffs’ lawyers from getting to the scientific data, it’s big problems.”

Does this sound like a procedure that is uniquely benevolent to all children posing zero risk to anybody?

Shouldn’t even the possibility of just one child suffering just one of these ‘side-effects’ make you think twice before attempting to impress upon young minds with corporate propaganda?

One is left to wonder whether measles (really more of an infection than a disease) is even enough of an issue to roll the dice and risk such damaging side-effects.

Once-upon-a-time all that was needed to cure the measles was a week off from school and some nutritious food, and the immune system was better off because of it.

Health decisions such as these should be of little business to the school. However, if education were truly the objective here then why was no counterweight offered?

Why were the children not furnished with work done by such notable people as Robert Kennedy Jr., CDC whistleblower Bill Thompson, Dr. Andrew Wakefield or the Harvard immunologist and Rockefeller University graduate Tetyana Obukhanych to see if their side of the story sounds more or less credible to them?

This is the fundamental difference between education and indoctrination; education allows all sides to be heard and allows people to draw their own conclusions.

As I have already stated the 4 main companies responsible for the creation and promotion of childhood vaccines are convicted criminals.

Since 2009 these four companies (Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer and Sanofi) have collectively paid 35 billion dollars in criminal penalties, damages and fines for defrauding regulators, falsifying science, bribing doctors and lying to the public.

But because of a little piece of legislation known as the ‘Vaccine Protection Act’, alluded to earlier by Dr. John Abramson, parents are unable to sue the manufacturers in the event that their child suffers from one of the ‘side effects’ that are listed on the insert to the vaccine itself!

To add further insult to quite literal injury, these companies are entirely exempt from performing safety tests on their products. This is unprecedented for ‘health products’ and has already proven to be disastrous.

For example:

It is now a known fact that the drug Vioxx which was created by Merck (the foremost company behind the MMR vaccine) killed at least 120,000 people before it was finally taken off the shelf. It is also known that Merck knew the drug caused heart attacks but prevented that information from being made public.

These are the very same people dictating to us what we should be injecting our children with, and it is their nonobjective propaganda you are poisoning our children’s minds with.

Perhaps the students could have been given a printout of a CBS News article titled, ‘Merck Created Hit List to ”Destroy” “Neutralize” or “Discredit” Dissenting Doctors’ to help them form an opinion of the companies that are behind the campaign for compulsory vaccination; a campaign that is entirely at variance with the Nuremberg Code.

A little bit of critical thinking is required here, something that is in short supply in the unyielding fields of public education.

It can easily be proven that the pharmaceutical cartel holds massive sway over our media. These unscrupulous companies pay billions of dollars a year in advertising revenue to the television stations.

It is for this reason that we are constantly bombarded with drug ads of all make and model, all of which spend the duration of the commercial listing off the plethora of serious ‘side effects’ while images of vibrant smiling faces pass by on the screen.

Recently I saw a big measles scare piece put out by Lester Holt on NBC. The general tone of it was not one of unbiased investigation but rather one of fear-mongering and over-the-top sensationalism.

Read More @