by Susan Duclos, All News Pipeline:
We at ANP have documented the antics going on at college campuses across the nation for years, where social justice warrior activismis not only out of control on the part of the students, but where educators and university administrations have allowed, and in many cases encouraged and joined student-led protests…… activism at the expense of basic education.
Examples include colleges now offering “social justice” courses, giving credits for political activism, allowing students to dictate institutional policy, and in many cases, professors that actively participate in planning and organizing protests and social justice warrior activism.
One prime example of the college professors and educators being as bad or even worse than the triggered student social justice warriors is the case of Eric Clanton, former Diablo Valley College philosophy professor joining an Antifa protest and smashed a bike lock over the heads of multiple Trump supporters.
As with the world of politics these days, any individual thought that does not fit the liberal mindset of the majority of professors and school officials, is received with howls of RACISM, and off and running the students, and some school faculty go to destroy anyone they have a problem with by any means necessary and suffering no consequences for the damage to those innocent of the charge, that were defamed, slandered and ridiculed.
OBERLIN COLLEGE JUST LEARNED A $44 MILLION LESSON
Recently a jury awarded Gibson’s Bakery $11 million in damages for being defamed as racist by Oberlin college students and officials, followed up by a whopping $33 million as a punitive reward, in a very expensive lesson about what happens when colleges shift from academics to activism.
Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University, Jonathan Turley, explains the case against Oberlin succinctly:
The latest controversy began with a shoplifting case. In 2016, an African American student named Jonathan Aladin was caught trying to steal a bottle of wine from Gibson’s Bakery, which was established in 1885 and has been closely tied to the college for over a century. When the grandson of the owner tried to stop Aladin, a fight ensued and police were called. Aladin and two other students, Cecilia Whettstone and Endia Lawrence, were arrested. Students, professors, and administrators held protests, charging that the bakery was racist and profiled the three students.
Oberlin maintains in court filings that the son and grandson of the owners of Gibson’s Bakery “violently and unreasonably attacked” an unarmed student, but that is not how the police viewed it. Aladin was charged with robbery, which is a second degree felony, and Whettstone and Lawrence were charged with first degree misdemeanor assault. Police rejected claims of a racial motive and noted that, over a period of five years, 40 adults were arrested for shoplifting at Gibson’s Bakery, but only six were African American. It also is not how the court viewed it. When prosecutors cut a plea deal to reduce the charge to attempted theft, a local judge refused. He said the plea deal appeared to be the result of a permanent “economic sanction” by the college in which the victim had little choice but to relent. Ultimately, all three students pleaded guilty.
The trial lasted for days, so it is impossible to explain all the ins and outs, but the school was held legally accountable for the student protest because of internal communications exposed during the trial as one school official even said at one point she would “unleash the students,” and multiple faculty and officials actively participated in the protest.
More from Turley on the context of that comment:
Not all Oberlin faculty members were silent in opposition to the boycott and protests. Theater professor Roger Copeland spoke publicly against the treatment of the bakery, but a livid vice president for communications Ben Jones responded to colleagues in a text message with an expletive against Copeland. Raimondo replied saying she would “unleash the students” if she was not convinced “this needs to be put behind us.
Legal Insurrection followed the case closely and in a long series of tweets (unrolled and on one page here) presented key portions of testimony with specifics that the jury heard, which obviously contributed to an unprecedented judgement against Oberlin College.
While the college continued to claim their officials were only present to keep an eye on the protest and students for safety purposes, that was directly contradicted by the fact that faculty members were seen handing out flyers for the protest that stated “[Gibson’s] is a RACIST establishment with a LONG ACCOUNT of RACIAL PROFILING and DISCRIMINATION,” along with other evidence from the trial presented.